Abstract

Integration of satellite-based data with hydrological modelling was generally conducted via data assimilation or model calibration, and both approaches can enhance streamflow predictions. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of another approach that uses satellite-based soil moisture data to directly estimate the parameter β to represent the degree of the spatial distribution of soil moisture storage capacity in the semi-distributed Hymod model. The impact of using historical root-zone soil moisture data from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission on the prior estimation of the parameter β was explored. Two different ways to incorporate the root-zone soil moisture data to estimate the parameter β are proposed, i.e., one is to derive a priori distribution of β , and the other is to derive a fixed value for β . The simulations of the Hymod models employing the two ways to estimate β are compared with the results produced by the original model, i.e., the one without employing satellite-based data to estimate the parameter β , at three study catchments (the Upper Hanjiang River catchment, the Xiangjiang River catchment, and the Ganjiang River catchment). The results illustrate that the two ways to incorporate the SMAP root-zone soil moisture data in order to predetermine the parameter β of the semi-distributed Hymod model both perform well in simulating streamflow during the calibration period, and a slight improvement was found during the validation period. Notably, deriving a fixed β value from satellite soil moisture data can provide better performance for ungauged catchments despite reducing the model freedom degrees due to fixing the β value. It is concluded that the robustness of the Hymod model in predicting the streamflow can be improved when the spatial information of satellite-based soil moisture data is utilized to estimate the parameter β .

Highlights

  • Numerous studies have highlighted the value of introducing additional data sources into hydrological models [1,2]

  • Hydrological models typically adopt a Soil Moisture Accounting (SMA) module to conceptualize the complex behavior of soil moisture dynamics rather than directly use soil moisture data as inputs due to the fact that ground-based measurements of soil moisture are unavailable in many regions [10]

  • The parameter β controls the spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture storage capacity, and it has been commonly calibrated against observed streamflow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous studies have highlighted the value of introducing additional data sources into hydrological models [1,2]. Microwaved observations from active and passive sensors are the most widely used, which include Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) [13], the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) [14], the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) [15], the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) [16], and the Sentinel missions [17]. They provide extensive soil moisture products at different spatio-temporal resolutions. Several soil moisture products have been produced by blending satellite data and the other data sources, such as soil moisture products from the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) [25]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call