Abstract
This paper is a companion to our previous contribution deriving a new approximate bistatic model for electromagnetic scattering from perfectly conducting rough surfaces. We evaluate this model numerically and compare it with an ‘exact’ numerical solution of the scattering problem. This comparison shows good agreement between our approximation and numerical solution for a wide range of incident and scattering angles. However, for horizontal-incident horizontal-scattered polarization (HH-pol), the model exhibits strong deviation from the ‘exact’ solution for near-grazing scattering angles. The model shows a similar divergence at HH-pol when compared with the small-perturbation method (SPM). The cause of this divergence is explained. During the SPM comparison, we noticed that the integral equation method model also does not reproduce the SPM limit except for forward and backscatter geometries. We propose in this paper a simple modification of our model to ensure agreement with the bistatic SPM approximation when applicable, and show that the modified model also yields close agreement with numerical computations even when the surface roughness does not satisfy the SPM condition.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
