Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide more independence to people with severe motor disabilities but current BCIs' performance is still not optimal and often the user's intentions are misinterpreted. Error-related potentials (ErrPs) are the neurophysiological signature of error processing and their detection can help improving a BCI's performance.A major inconvenience of BCIs is that they commonly require a long calibration period, before the user can receive feedback of their own brain signals. Here, we use the data of 15 participants and compare the performance of a personalized ErrP classifier with a generic ErrP classifier. We concluded that there was no significant difference in classification performance between the generic and the personalized classifiers (Wilcoxon signed rank tests, two-sided and one-sided left and right). This results indicate that the use of a generic ErrP classifier is a good strategy to remove the calibration period of a ErrP classifier, allowing participants to receive immediate feedback of the ErrP detections.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.