Abstract
The Hammett acidity function method (HAFM), the excess acidity function method (EAM), and the Bunnett–Olsen method (BOM) have been compared in order to rationalize the differences observed between pKBH+ values estimated by each classical method. The results point out that on the basis of (i) the strength and kind of bases analysed and (ii) the aqueous acid solution used to determine the ionization ratios CBH+/CB=I, it is possible to predict when the three methods give similar results and when they give different pKBH+ values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
