Abstract
We assessed research articles (N = 118) published in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were coded based on author, research topic, sample, and method characteristics. Over time the proportion of research articles have doubled, while practitioner authorship contributions have decreased. Client characteristics and process issues have been the most frequently researched topic areas, and child-adolescent and adult clients have been participants more often than graduate students. Quantitative designs outnumbered qualitative approaches 2:1 overall, while the number of mixed-methods studies increased considerably. Implications and future directions are provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
