A comparative study between crack analysis and a mechanical test for assessing the polymerization stress of restorative composites

Abstract

ObjectivesTo verify the hypothesis that crack analysis and a mechanical test would rank a series of composites in a similar order with respect to polymerization stress. Also, both tests would show similar relationships between stress and composite elastic modulus and/or shrinkage. MethodsSoda-lime glass discs (2-mm thick) with a central perforation (3.5-mm diameter) received four Vickers indentations 500μm from the cavity margin. The indent cracks were measured (500×) prior and 10min after the cavity was restored with one of six materials (Kalore/KL, Gradia/GR, Ice/IC, Wave/WV, Majesty Flow/MF, and Majesty Posterior/MP). Stresses at the indent site were calculated based on glass fracture toughness and increase in crack length. Stress at the bonded interface was calculated using the equation for an internally pressurized cylinder. The mechanical test used a universal testing machine and glass rods (5-mm diameter) as substrate. An extensometer monitored specimen height (2mm). Nominal stress was calculated dividing the maximum shrinkage force by the specimen cross-sectional area. Composite elastic modulus was determined by nanoindentation and post-gel shrinkage was measured using strain gages. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal–Wallis/Mann–Whitney tests (alpha: 5%). ResultsBoth tests grouped the composites in three statistical subsets, with small differences in overlapping between the intermediate subset (MF, WV) and the highest (MP, IC) or the lowest stress materials (KL, GR). Higher stresses were developed by composites with high modulus and/or high shrinkage. SignificanceCrack analysis demonstrated to be as effective as the mechanical test to rank composites regarding polymerization stress.