Abstract
Statement of problemPolymerization protocol of dual-cured resin cements plays a great role in the success of restorations. Knowledge about the effect of light-curing protocol on the contraction stress value and the mechanical properties would assist in the development, selection and handling of the resin cement material. PurposeThis study was undertaken to assess the effects of two different light-curing protocols on the polymerization shrinkage stress and nano-creep of two current dual-cured resin cements. Materials and methodsTwenty-four soda-lime glass disks, measuring 1mm in thickness, with a perforation in their center that measured 3mm in diameter, received four Vickers indentations at a distance of 500µ from the margin. The indent cracks were measured before and at 15-, 30- and 60-min intervals after restoration of the cavity with either CLEARFIL™ SA or RelyX™ Ultimate cement. Twelve specimens were prepared from each resin cement and divided into two groups according to the curing protocol used: immediate and delayed light-curing. Stresses at the indent impression were calculated by considering glass fracture toughness and the increase in crack length. Stress at the bonded interface was calculated using the Lame equation for thick-walled cylinder under an internal pressure. Nano-indentation hardness, modulus of elasticity and creep of each cement were measured under a 10-mN load for 20s holding time. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24h before the nano-indentation tests. Data were analyzed with two-way and repeated-measures ANOVA (α≤0.05). ResultsCuring protocol had a significant effect on both resin cements; higher stress values were recorded with the immediate curing mode (P=0.033). Curing mode did not exert a significant effect on the modulus of elasticity (P=0.595) and hardness (P=0.454) of resin cements. However, in relation to creep, it exhibited significant effects (P<0.0001). ConclusionsImmediate light-curing resulted in higher polymerization stress and lower nano-creep values compared to the delayed protocol with the resin cements assessed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.