Abstract

The 18 O enrichment (Δ18 O) of leaf water affects the Δ18 O of photosynthetic products such as sucrose, generating an isotopic archive of plant function and past climate. However, uncertainty remains as to whether leaf water compartmentation between photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic tissue affects the relationship between Δ18 O of bulk leaf water (Δ18 OLW ) and leaf sucrose (Δ18 OSucrose ). We grew Lolium perenne (a C3 grass) in mesocosm-scale, replicated experiments with daytime relative humidity (50% or 75%) and CO2 level (200, 400 or 800 μmol mol-1 ) as factors, and determined Δ18 OLW , Δ18 OSucrose and morphophysiological leaf parameters, including transpiration (Eleaf ), stomatal conductance (gs ) and mesophyll conductance to CO2 (gm ). The Δ18 O of photosynthetic medium water (Δ18 OSSW ) was estimated from Δ18 OSucrose and the equilibrium fractionation between water and carbonyl groups (εbio ). Δ18 OSSW was well predicted by theoretical estimates of leaf water at the evaporative site (Δ18 Oe ) with adjustments that correlated with gas exchange parameters (gs or total conductance to CO2 ). Isotopic mass balance and published work indicated that nonphotosynthetic tissue water was a large fraction (~0.53) of bulk leaf water. Δ18 OLW was a poor proxy for Δ18 OSucrose , mainly due to opposite Δ18 O responses of nonphotosynthetic tissue water (Δ18 Onon-SSW ) relative to Δ18 OSSW , driven by atmospheric conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call