Abstract

‘Donation for Education’, which has been expanding over the past decade, has a problem in that it is difficult to identify in detail due to the use of the unclear term ‘education’. This study critically reviewed discussions on ‘Donation for Education’ to understand what efforts were made to solve this problem. As a result of the research, behind the discussion, there were problems with wrong views of education, such as confusion between schools and education, borrowing concepts from other disciplines, and result-oriented views of education. With these reasons, ‘education’ referred to different things at each time and was difficult to discuss. By leaving the context, it was becoming an obstacle to the progress of the ‘Donation for Education’ discussion. In addition, due to the drifting term ‘education’, not only the omnipresent education inside and outside of schools, but also various facts within schools have been concealed and distorted. The term ‘education’ in ‘Donation for Education’ should be deleted and replaced with a term that reveals what actually happens. As a result, discussions on donations to support various aspects of schools become clearer, and education can be separated into a separate object of recognition.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call