КОРПУСНО-ОБ’ЄКТИВНА ГРАМАТИКА: СТАТУС, РІВНІ

Abstract

Principles of the corpus-objective grammar with an expansion of the principles of objectivity, functionality, of society, normativity/abnormality, usability ↔ of individuality, discursivity are considered, units and corpus of the body-objective grammar are characterized. With the help of the analysis of the degrees of preposition, their expression is differentiated by the qualification of the following degrees: 1) proper prepositions, 2) words used in the meaning of the preposition, 3) words that implement the function of the preposition, 4) words that appear as prepositions by analogy, and 5) words, taken occasionally, as the prepositions.The principle of objectivity of the сorpus-objective grammar is based on the ontological nature of the operation of grammatical units, forms, norms, etc., their epistemological character of definition. Accordingly, functionality is the implementation of any grammatical form, unit, etc., certain function. Formation and/or constructing of statements takes into account the features of the semantic space of a grammatical form, a unit, while the grammatical form is defined by a function. The environment of the use of the grammatical form and its power loads creates its functional. Influence of the function on the grammatical form is demonstrated on different expressions of its evolution. Solidarity of the corpus-objective grammar reflects the conventional status of grammatical norms and their national-system observance, since such extinctions (system expectations) determine the status of social sanctions, which regulate the functional load of grammatical norms. The system of the latter does not regulate the possible deviations within the framework of those language-social groups. The linguistic motivation of different grammatical norms is conditioned by the fact that there is the formed tradition of their use, gradual establishment, in society. The principle of normativity/abnormativity of corpus-objective grammar is based on the real manifestations of morphological and syntactic forms with a reflection of their status functionality. The defining nature of the principle of normativity/abnormativity is motivated by the fact that compliance with its requirements ensures the establishment of literary codification, language stability, continuity and wealth. The degree of distribution of normativity, signs of regularity and/or irregularity indicates the appropriate degree of distribution in the national space, the nature of use in different language corporative communities, the presence or absence of regional markers of norms. The assimilation of the norms of literary language appears one of the most significant manifestations of the formation of the linguistic personality of a modern person. The duality of the normative principle outlines the ability of the linguistic person to realize himself in literary-codified practice and in abnormative derivatives. The principle of usage ↔ of the individuality basically reflects the dynamics of the penetration of those individual (or individualized entities) into the wider space, the acquisition of such derivatives (individual morphological or syntactic forms) relative to the regular and / or repetitive status. Such a sample of education is sometimes recognized and diagnosed as the author's or fixed markers of the corresponding corporate space, a certain age category, etc. Similar derivatives are mostly recognizable in the grammar of a particular speaker, and one can establish individual-language preferences through them, etc. The principle of discursivity of the body-objective grammar is based on the realization of one or another expression of a morphological and / or syntactic form in discursive practices, the result of which are the texts of different genres, reflecting the corresponding communicative guides, intentions. Discourse practices in their integrity contain the plural and / or plurals of all speech measurements of the linguistic personality with the presence of various social, territorial, cultural, age, educational, gender and other factors. The latter cause a change in the linguo-individualization. Keywords: corpus-objective grammar, principles of corpus-objective grammar, preposition, discourse, corpus of texts.