Abstract
In this study, practical cases of the operation of the evaluation system of local governments in which the central and local governments are mutually involved were examined through the spread of the manual “local government investment-funding institution evaluation proposal model”. Through this, we tried to examine the role distribution through mutual cooperation between local governments and central government departments.
 As a result of the analysis, it was found that local governments are provided with the proposed model for the purpose of providing information, and the use of this model is different between metropolitan areas and basic local governments. While overall utilization was high in both metropolitan areas and basic local governments, metropolitan local governments showed high utilization of the proposed model's annual corona extra point index and social value index, while the basic local government showed higher overall utilization. This is because regional governments operate a relatively stable evaluation system due to the allocation of personnel in charge, and focus on improvement items every year. It was found that they were actively accepting it.
 The proposed model that can show the realistic and complementary relationship between the central government and local governments based on the experience and assets of about 30 years since the election of the head of the popular election was carried out in earnest can be said to be a representative example of the relationship between governments. This was possible because local governments made an active request to the central government, and since the start of the proposed model is a bottom-up method, it can be said that it can provide implications for establishing the relationship between local governments and the central government in the future.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call