Abstract
In the industries, pipelines are used and various kinds of valves are applied for the purpose of use and for controlling flow rates according to pressure and velocity, which are the physical properties of internal fluids. Glove valves, which are commonly used in the industries for opening and closing of piping and precision flow control, are subject to technical and economic limitations due to complex internal flow path geometry and consequent structural instability. On the other hand, butterfly valves have advantages such as low weight and low manufacturing costs, but it is difficult to control flow at 60° or higher. Therefore, in this study, the performance of the valve was assessed by analyzing the flow coefficient of the glove valve and the butterfly valve of the same diameter, and the performance with the glove valve of the same diameter was compared by adding one-half baffle to the rear end of the butterfly valve. For butterfly valves with baffles added, flow control similar to glove valves has been verified.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Korean Society for Power System Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.