Abstract

Budgetary sphere is subject to the risks of budget accounting and reporting violations, which managers and accountants face. To reduce risks and confirm accuracy of accounting and reporting, modern control and audit tools are used at the level of departments and institutions. Internal control and audit in recent years are constantly being reformed and transformed on the basis of goals and objectives. Federal standards are used to regulate internal financial audit, and normative base for internal financial control is far from being perfect and is not very clear in practice. In this regard, there are many discrepancies, interpretations and understanding of organization of these types of control in institutions. The purpose of the study is to compare internal financial control and audit in the public sphere, substantiate the unity and opposite of the control purpose and describe verification methodology and the tools. The research methodology is based on application of monographic research methods, discussion, analysis of normative base, economic substantiation of the provisions of departmental regulations in the field of control and audit, comparative assessment of internal financial control and audit. As a result, comparative assessment of internal financial control and audit is given, and the relationship between internal financial control and audit is demonstrated. This relationship can be traced through the purpose of these types of control. The importance of methods, ways and techniques of control and audit as components of the tools of the controller and auditor is substantiated. It is shown which methods are used in practice by internal auditors, and which are used by internal controllers, and what methodological and instrumental relationship is between them.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call