Abstract
The article examines the classification of unilateral transactions in civil law into main and auxiliary ones. The author gives the examples of transactions that can be attributed to each of these groups, and critically evaluates the position on the characterization of the main transactions as a set of auxiliary transactions that are interconnected with each other and are made sequentially. The article analyzes the definitions of the concept «auxiliary contract» available in the legal literature, as well as the types of such transactions in civil law. The study of the classification issue allowed to carry out its application to unilateral transactions. Special attention is paid to the problem of the ambiguous position of regulatory transactions in the analyzed classification, which leads to a confusion of concepts in the doctrine and in judicial practice. As a result of the consideration of the transactions classification into mandatory and regulatory transactions, the author justifies the position that regulatory transactions cannot be unambiguously attributed to the basic or auxiliary transactions, gives the examples of unilateral transactions in housing law, determines their place in the analyzed classification, and concludes on the significance of the considered classification for housing law and civil science in general.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
