Abstract
The article discusses the features of various kinds of statements and consents in housing law, which can be attributed to unilateral transactions. An assessment of judicial practice is made, which develops on the issue of qualification of applications and consents. Species division of transactions-statements and transactions-consents was made taking into account the classification proposed by B.B. Cherepakhin (the division of unilateral transactions into unilaterally binding and unilaterally enabling transactions). It is noted that a feature of the unilateral transactions under consideration is that they come or are directed to public authorities, which makes it difficult to qualify them as civil law facts, however, certain signs can be highlighted that allow this. But at the same time, attention is focused on the fact that not all applications and transactions in housing law have a civil law nature, which means that not all can be qualified as unilateral transactions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
