Abstract
The cultural context of the concept of “postmodern” is being criticized and revised, as it does not satisfy the need to comprehend the problems associated with the transformation of human (human nature) and existing engineering and technological practices. New “names”, terms (posthumanism, metamodernism, etc.) are proposed, actualizing the modern existentials of culture, while leaving ontology out of discussion. The article proves that ontology still remains with two dominant centers identified by the postmodern: the ontology of the subject, expanding social, communicative empiricism, encountering a new sign-symbolic form (digitalization) and methods (fragmentation, convergence, etc.), and deconstruction, “removing” the dominance of meaning in culture and developing further constructivist ways of artistic, techno-scientific, social practices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
