Abstract

The author examines the terminological and literary history dilemmas in terms of the periodization of Serbian literature, indicates the shift from the older (chronological-philological) benchmarks to the newer, typological ones, which more clearly mark the processes where the poetic focus of one period is superseded by the focus of another one. The downside of periodization lies in the fixity of boundaries between the periods, unalterable classifications of works and unsubstantiated modernization. The author perceives the relations between the literary periods as a dotty intersection of sets. With regard to the history and models of the periodization of Serbian literature, the author points out to the writers’ oeuvres (such as J. S. Popović’s, P. P. Njegoš’, Đ. Jaksić’s etc) as a dynamic blend of evolving poetic norms. The starting point of any periodization has to take into account the antinomies of equivalence, commonalities and differences, (quasi) synchrony and real diachrony. The classification of works within one period assumes the minimal level of their key common features; every period/epoch is seen through the perpetual metamorphosis between two boundaries (the prevailing norms of the previous and the upcoming period).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.