Abstract
In the process of integrating ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) technologies into academic discourse, the procedure of writing an academic text is changing, and a new type of communicative interaction is formed – AI as the author of a ‘generated text’ (GТ) and a human being as the recipient of a text from AI. The aim of the study is to substantiate the perception of such a text by the recipient from the point of view of pragmalinguistic analysis on the basis of the identified features and indicators. An analysis of the functioning of artificially generated academic text is presented (5 scientific texts were generated by the Mahtext system). For the first time machine text is considered as an ‘speech act’ in three directions of its realisation: plan of expression, content and prediction. It is revealed that the neural network as a text author cannot transform and convey any attitude to the addressee (recipient), just as it cannot consciously influence him through its texts and have pragmatic intentions. The novelty of the study consists in the following: 1) for the first time we consider not an anthropological text, but an AI text; 2) as a result of pragmalinguistic analysis are revealed 7 main features and 7 indicators of GT; 3) the concept of ‘artificial speech act’ is proposed for the first time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
