Эволюция статуса органов конституционного правосудия в Кыргызской Республике

Abstract

The article analyzes the main trends and features inherent in the evolution of the status of constitutional justice bodies in the Kyrgyz Republic. The aim of this research is to identify both the common features characteristic of this process in the countries existing in the post-Soviet space and the specific ones due to the peculiarities of the state and legal development of Kyrgyzstan. In the course of the research, a comparative legal method was used to analyze individual elements of the legal status of the Constitutional Court and the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kyrgyzstan (organization, competence, status of judges, legal force of decisions, etc.) in accordance with the constitutions of the Kyrgyz Republic of 1993, 2010, and 2021, the laws in force that regulated the organization and procedure for the implementation of constitutional justice, as well as when compared with the development of this institution in the Russian Federation and other CIS member states. In addition, analytical, formal legal and other methods were used, which made it possible to formulate the main conclusions. Based on a systems analysis of the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic on constitutional justice, decisions of the Constitutional Court and the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kyrgyzstan, a study of the works of leading Russian (N.V. Vitruk, A.A. Klishas, I.A.Kravets, M.A. Mityukov, et al.) and Kyrgyz (A.A. Arabaev, B.I. Borubashov, R.M. Myrzalimov, B.T. Toktobaev, et al.) scientists in this field, the main tasks to improve the organization and implementation of constitutional justice in Kyrgyzstan were identified. These include: consistent strengthening of the independence of the Constitutional Court from other public authorities; a more detailed delineation of the powers of the Constitutional Court and other courts related to normative control, taking into account the processes of the formation of administrative justice; a more detailed regulation of the procedures of constitutional proceedings, including procedural differentiation of the procedure for exercising various powers of the Constitutional Court, modification of the norms on the legal force, and the procedure for the execution of its acts, including recognition of a certain discretion of the Court in determining measures necessary for the implementation of its decisions; improving the procedures for written proceedings and expanding the further use of information and communication technologies in constitutional proceedings, etc. The implementation of these tasks should be associated with general measures to increase the level of political and legal culture in society.