Abstract

The object of this article is to build forecasts of the development of Kazan, Naberezhnye Chelny and Almetyevsk agglomerations, located in the territory of the Republic of Tatarstan. The agglomerations’ formation has firmly taken place as one of the main strategic goals of our country’s development over the past few years. According to forecasts, almost 80% of GDP growth until 2020 will be provided by agglomerations. In this regard, it is especially important to study the existing agglomerations from the position of the achieved and future level of development. The results of the analysis of these agglomerations’ state over the past decade have presented in the article, on the basis of which the forecasts of the development of these agglomerations in the medium term until 2020 were calculated. The research methodology is the least squares method and the moving average method, comparing the results of which allowed us to make more adequate forecasts. When using each of the methods, also there was carried out the analysis of the forecast’ average relative error. A comparative analysis of the situation and agglomerations’ forecasts showed that Kazan agglomeration can be considered the most developed, because most of the estimated indicators show growth. Naberezhnye Chelny and Almetyevsk agglomerations lag behind Kazan agglomeration especially in demographic indicators. In general, all three studied agglomerations in the formation of their development plans should focus their attention primarily on level of migration, the volume of investment in fixed capital per capita, GDP per capita factors. The conducted analysis allowed to identify the main trends in the development of each agglomeration, as well as to formulate recommendations for the management of these agglomerations development.

Highlights

  • По прогнозам, почти 80 % прироста валового внутреннего продукта до 2020 г. будут обеспечивать именно агломерации [1]

  • Средняя относительная ошибка для данного показателя МСС является хорошей, тогда как по МНК она превышает 20 %, что говорит о более низкой точности

  • Основные социально-экономические показатели городов – 2016 г.» [Электронный ресурс] // Федеральная служба государственной статистики

Read more

Summary

Демографические показатели

Х3 – ввод нового жилья на душу населения, м2/чел. Х4 – соотношение среднедушевых денежных доходов и величины прожиточного минимума Х5 – инвестиции в основной капитал на душу населения, тыс. Х6 – валовой территориальный продукт на душу населения, тыс. Таблица 3 Прогнозирование социально-экономического развития Казанской агломерации на 2018-2020 гг

МСС МНК
Findings
Библиографический список
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.