Abstract

Despite the existing arsenal of various methods of quantitative risk analysis both in Russian and international practice, problems arise related to the assessment of the reliability of the results obtained during their practical application, including at oil and gas facilities. The question remains to what extent the decision-maker can trust the results. The article considers the problem of assessing the reliability of quantitative risk analysis at oil and gas facilities. Existing methods for estimating reliability are investigated. It is proposed to use an approach based on ensuring the quality of the process of risk analysis itself. To increase the objectivity in assessing the reliability of the results of a risk analysis, a formal quantitative method was proposed. The article introduces 5 criteria that ensure the quality of the process of risk analysis at oil and gas facilities. A system of rules for coding the values of each of the basic criteria into three discrete qualitative levels was developed. The solution of the task was accomplished by constructing a classifier in which the reliability index of a quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas industry objects is a function of the values of the basic criteria. The reliability of the risk analysis was evaluated on the basis of a naive Bayesian classifier that takes into account the values of the five basic criteria in the evaluation framework. The results of the classifier work are based on a variety of training data that were previously evaluated by experts. The article suggests an approach to the assessment of the quality of the classifier itself, based on a cross-checking with successive exclusion of one copy of the training data. The merits of using the naive Bayesian classifier for assessing the reliability of quantitative risk analysis in oil and gas industry objects include the fact that the classification is carried out quite easily and quickly, surpasses many other algorithms, and requires a smaller amount of training data. A naive Bayesian classifier works very well with categorical features, which is exactly what is reflected in this article.

Highlights

  • Despite the existing arsenal of various methods of quantitative risk analysis both in Russian and international practice, problems arise related to the assessment of the reliability of the results obtained during their practical application, including at oil and gas facilities

  • The article considers the problem of assessing the reliability of quantitative risk analysis at oil and gas facilities

  • The solution of the task was accomplished by constructing a classifier in which the reliability index of a quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas industry objects is a function of the values of the basic criteria

Read more

Summary

Ñòðóêòóðà îöåíêè

Ðàññìîòðèì ïðåäëàãàåìûé ïîäõîä ê îöåíêå äîñòîâåðíîñòè êîëè÷åñòâåííîãî àíàëèçà ðèñêà íà îñíîâå êëàññèôèêàöèè ñ èñïîëüçîâàíèåì ÍÁÊ. L Ïðîöåññ ðàñ÷åòà ðèñêà íå ñîäåðæèò ñåðüåçíûõ îøèáîê; l ìîãóò ñóùåñòâîâàòü òîëüêî ïîãðåøíîñòè ñàìîãî ïðîöåññà ðàñ÷åòà (íàïðèìåð, òî÷íîñòü ìîäåëèðîâàíèÿ ïî ìåòîäó Ìîíòå-Êàðëî èëè èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ êàêèõ-ëèáî ÷èñëåííûõ ìåòîäîâ); l íåîïðåäåëåííîñòè, âûçâàííûå ïîãðåøíîñòÿìè, íå ìîäåëèðóþòñÿ l The process of calculating the risk does not contain serious errors; l there can only exist errors in the calculation process itself L Ðåçóëüòàòû òàêîãî êîëè÷åñòâåííîãî àíàëèçà ðèñêà ìîãóò èñïîëüçîâàòüñÿ äëÿ ïîääåðæêè ïðèíÿòèÿ íåêîòîðûõ ðåøåíèé, íî íå äëÿ ïðèíÿòèÿ êðèòè÷åñêè âàæíûõ äëÿ áåçîïàñíîñòè îáúåêòîâ ðåøåíèé l The result of a quantitative risk analysis is qualitative, but: — some critical factors and phenomena are not identified and analyzed; — or some important risks are not accurately determined. L Ðåçóëüòàòû òàêîãî êîëè÷åñòâåííîãî àíàëèçà ðèñêà ìîãóò èñïîëüçîâàòüñÿ äëÿ ïîääåðæêè ïðèíÿòèÿ âàæíûõ ðåøåíèé l The result of quantitative risk analysis is qualitative: — all critical factors and phenomena are identified and taken into account in risk analysis; — all important risks (and their uncertainties) are precisely defined. Ñíà÷àëà ðàññìîòðèì îáùèé ïîäõîä ê êëàññèôèêàöèè íà îñíîâå ÍÁÊ, à çàòåì îïèøåì ìåòîä íà îñíîâå ÍÁÊ, ïðåäëàãàåìûé íåïîñðåäñòâåííî äëÿ îöåíêè äîñòîâåðíîñòè è íàäåæíîñòè êîëè÷åñòâåííîãî àíàëèçà ðèñêà îáúåêòîâ íåôòåãàçîâîé îòðàñëè

Íàèâíûé áàéåñîâñêèé êëàññèôèêàòîð
Îöåíêà äîñòîâåðíîñòè ðåçóëüòàòîâ àíàëèçà ðèñêà
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call