К ВОПРОСУ О КОММУНИКАТИВНЫХ ОСОБЕННОСТЯХ ЯЗЫКОВОЙ ЛИЧНОСТИ В ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЯХ Г. ГАЗДАНОВА

Abstract

The paper covers the analysis of the communicative features of G. Gazdanov’s prose from the perspective of representation of the author’s linguistic persona. Based on the analysis of G. Gazdanov’s texts, the paper studies different levels of communication that occur between the author and the reader, as well as between the characters acting as the interpretation of oral activity of the society representatives by the author’s consciousness. The problems of studying the linguistic phenomena of the Russian emigre community as the isolated enclave’s language are of absolute interest in modern linguistics. The authors consider the dualistic nature of the central character of G. Gazdanov’s works and his linguistic realization and analyze the author’s tools consolidating the linguistic picture of the world and the man in the works of G. Gazdanov. The paper presents the methods of the author’s impact on the reader through the application of various psychological and linguistic means. The author's language is analyzed as the specific linguistic structure, the genesis of which is considered in the context of the unity of mental and emotional development of the author, the character and the reader interacting with the text. The study of deep nature of the human consciousness, his motives and the principles of the individuals’ interaction within the society are considered the main communicative purpose of the author’s text. The authors consider the linguistic features of G. Gazdanov’s texts, their distinctive features distinguishing the author’s language between the number of other linguistic phenomena. The authors pay special attention to the typological characteristic of the level communicative interaction of the author, the characters, and the readers, highlight the specific features of each level and give its typological description. The authors’ analysis is supported by the examples from the texts of G. Gazdanov’s works illustrating the line of reasoning, as well as by the involvement of wide research base. The analysis allows making some conclusions concerning the special aspects of development not only of the language of a particular author but the language of Russian literature in the second third of the twentieth century in the whole.