Abstract

The article outlines the logic of experimental verification of the author’s quality management models of training of university students majoring in Finance and Economics. The tools for assessing the quality of training are the methods of testing, knowledge assessments, questionnaires, public surveys, feedback from employers, etc. The initial data for the assessment were the materials of statistical accounting and reporting, the results of certification, monitoring the level of knowledge of students majoring in Finance and Economics, and educational programs. We analysed the obtained data and developed recommendations for achieving maximum efficiency of the studied process on their basis.We took into account the results of external monitoring of the quality of professional training of students majoring in Finance and Economics, which was carried out by licensing the right of particular higher educational institutions (HEIs) to carry out educational activities in general and in particular majors, as well as accreditation of HEIs in general and individual educational programs. The internal subjects of monitoring the quality of professional training of students majoring in Finance and Economics include the administration of the HEI, its structural subdivisions; an educational and methodical management of HEI; state attestation commission. The level of professional competence of students majoring in Finance and Economics is of key importance for the quality of education received. Therefore, we decided to compare the level of this competence in students who participated in the experimental study at the beginning and end of our research. We formed the experimental and control groups at universities to achieve the purity of the experiment and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the author’s model of the system of professional training of students majoring in Finance and Economics. At the formative stage of the experiment, we oriented students majoring in Finance and Economics to future professions, significantly replenishing their thesaurus, choosing the methods, tools and techniques that would significantly increase the student’s activity in the classroom, promote sustainable interest in classes, improve self-esteem, promote the development of qualities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.