Several Xiphinema nematode species are vectors of regulated nepoviruses. The aim of this study was to develop an optimized method to detect virus-carrying Xiphinema specimens. The study compared various techniques for nematode extraction from soil (Automated Zonal Centrifuging and Flegg’s Modified Cobb method), nematode cuticle disruption (slicing, bead beating, and bead beating with collagenase), RNA extraction (RNeasy Plant Mini Kit, CTAB, and KingFisher MagMAX RNA Isolation Kit), and nepovirus detection (nepovirus generic subgroup and species-specific RT-(q)PCR assays, as well as shotgun sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Sequencing technology using a MinION device). Based on this comparison, a diagnostic procedure is proposed including the best performing methods: nematode extraction using automated zonal centrifugation, physical disruption of nematode cuticle using bead beating or slicing, and RNA extraction using either the KingFisher MagMAX or the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit method. While existing generic nepovirus subgroup RT-PCR assays lacked sensitivity, species-specific RT-(q)PCR assays successfully detected ArMV, GFLV, and ToRSV in X. diversicaudatum, X. index, and X. americanum s.s., respectively. The reliability of nepovirus detection was higher with adults compared to juveniles. The minimum nematode quantity required varied depending on the specific nepovirus and the detection method used.
Read full abstract