Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the microleakage of monolithic zirconia after different surface treatments using computer software. Materials and Methods: Three different monolithic zirconia ML (Multilayered), STML (Super Translucent Multilayered), UTML (Ultra Translucent Multilayered) were prepared as discs with a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 1.2 mm. Four different surface treatments (Hydrofluoric acid, Tribochemical silica coating, Hydrofluoric acid application + Tribochemical silica coating, Milling + Tribochemical silica coating + Hydrofluoric acid application) were applied to the prepared samples according to their groups (n=8). Samples, Group C: Control group, Group HF: Hydrofluoric acid application, Group T: Tribochemical silica coating, Group HF+T: Hydrofluoric acid application + Tribochemical silica coating, Group F+HF+T: Milling + Tribochemical silica coating + Hydrofluoric acid application, then adhesive system was applied to all specimens and repaired with resin cement. The specimens were thermocycled for one year aging and then immersed in basic fuchsin solution to evaluate microleakage. The specimens were separated with a micro-cut device and evaluated under a stereomicroscope. The dimensions of the images were measured in Python program and the permeability and surface treatments of the zirconia samples were compared. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA (p<0.05). Results: UTML F+HF+T showed the lowest microleakage (12.15 ± 1.69), while ML C showed the highest microleakage (73.93 ± 1.59). Among the zirconia specimens, the highest adaptation was obtained in the UTML zirconia (37.59 ± 23.58). Conclusion: According to the data obtained, milling + tribochemical silica coating + acid application surface treatments are recommended for the repair of monolithic zirconia restorations. The sintering temperature and Yttrium Oxide (Y2O3) content of the monolithic zirconia used are effective factors in microleakage after repair.