Abstract This article provides a brief review of the entry of technology education into New Zealand schools. It outlines the nature of technological literacy underpinning the 1995 technology curriculum and indicates how this has manifested itself in student achievement after 10 years of implementation. The article then discusses how the technology curriculum revision process sought to respond to early implementation findings, and in particular the key role of leading New Zealand technologists in this process. It explains the role of the researchers in mediating between this community, the philosophy of technology literature, and the technology education sector. We argue that the development process has resulted in both a more robust curriculum framework for technology and a greater depth of understanding within the wider technology community of the nature and importance of technology education. Introduction Multiple forms of literacy (for example, mathematical literacy, scientific literacy, information literacy) are becoming more visible in general education, both nationally and internationally. However, how these literacies are defined and how they may combine to support the development of an overarching literacy has yet to be explored. National curriculum statements are well known for using such underdefined terms, and this is no less true in technology. This paper seeks to provide some insight into the development of an understanding of technological literacy for New Zealand education, as a starting point for future exploration into how it may function alongside other forms of literacy to support an overarching literacy for citizenship. The aim of Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 1995) was stated to be the development of students' technological literacy. The initial support material did not expand on this notion, and the teaching community was largely left to work out for themselves what technological literacy might look like and how it might be supported in classrooms. At this stage, all that was really known in technology education was that technological literacy was different from literacy developed within other disciplines (see, for example, Barnett, 1995; Gardner, 1994; Layton, 1993; Lewis & Gagel, 1992), and that such a literacy was essential for citizens living in a society that was mediated and challenged by technological developments and artefacts (see, for example, Heidegger, 1977; Idhe, 1983; Mumford, 1934; Petrina, 2000). Drawing on comparative work describing other countries' forays into technology (Black, 1994), New Zealand curriculum developers sought to position technology education on the broader side of the technological literacy debate; that is, aligned with a view of developing practical capability for citizenship rather than focusing on narrow technical competency (Compton, 2001). In an effort to provide guidance for teachers to support their students' developing technological literacy, classroom-based research became focused on developing a better understanding of technological practice (Compton & Harwood, 1999, 2003, 2005; Jones & Moreland, 2004; Moreland, Jones, & Northover, 2001). Technological practice was defined as that resulting activity that students could engage in when learning opportunities were based on all three strands of the 1995 curriculum statement--technological knowledge and understanding, technological capability, and technology and society. Technological practice, therefore, was viewed as the vehicle that would enable students to develop their technological literacy. This stance was coupled with an argument for a strong sociological focus within all technology programmes that would support a shift from a functional technological literacy, as critiqued by Pacey (1983), to one that was more critical in nature (Compton, 2001; Compton & Harwood, 2003; Compton & Jones, 2003; Davies Burns, 2000; Pacey, 1983; Petrina, 2000). …
Read full abstract