Gastric Cancer In Young Patients Research Articles

Analysis of demographic characteristics in 3242 young age gastric cancer patients in Korea

To evaluate the epidemiologic features of young age gastric cancer (GC). Retrospectively, a total of 3242 patients with GC between 18 and 45 years of age and 3000 sex- and age-matched controls were reviewed. All subjects were stratified into 3 groups based on age (A, 18-30 years; B, 31-40 years; C, 41-45 years). Epidemiologic characteristics and risk factors were investigated with reference to their age and gender. Compared to controls, more frequent intake of high risk diet (P = 0.00075), history of heavy smoking (P = 0.00087), intake of heavy alcohol (P = 0.00091), lower social economic status (P = 0.00083), body mass index > 30 (P = 0.00097), urban residence (P = 0.00065), and more frequent exposure to harmful occupational environments (P = 0.00072) were observed in all age groups and both genders in young age GC. These relationships were weaker in females compared to males of the same age, and were stronger as the age of patients increased. However, in group C of young age GC patients, environmental factors played important roles in females and males with a similar body weight. In females, older age at first delivery (> 35 years), lack of lactation history, nulliparity, and poor nutritional status during pregnancy were significantly associated with an increased risk of GC (P = 0.00034). In this study, 252 patients (7.8%) had a family history of GC with high odds ratio (OR) (3.22-4.21). In particular, family history was more closely associated with GC in males (OR, 4.21 in male vs 3.46 in female) and more advanced cases (P = 0.00051). Hormonal associated factors were more commonly associated with females whereas environmental factors were more commonly associated with males in young age GC patients.

Early Onset Gastric Cancer No Longer Presents as an Advanced Disease with Ominous Prognosis

Background: This study aimed to characterize the clinicopathological features and prognosis of early onset gastric carcinomas (EOGCs) in a sample of young Portuguese adults. Material and Methods: A subset of 415 patients submitted to gastric resection was divided into 2 groups: A – patients aged 45 years or less (n = 108), and B – patients older than 45 years (n = 307). The groups were compared for several clinicopathological features and the survival of the patients was analyzed by uni- and multivariate analysis. Results: The surgical resection rate was higher in young patients, in whom tumors more frequently displayed an ulcerative shape (p < 0.001) and diffuse/isolated cell-type histology (p < 0.001). In the elderly, the rate of vascular invasion was significantly higher (p = 0.002). Overall, the survival of young patients was higher than in the elderly (p < 0.001). Survival curves were higher in young patients, except for pT4 and pM1 cases. In the multivariate survival analysis, age (p < 0.001), depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001), nodal status (p < 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.011) and distant metastases (p = 0.007) emerged as independent prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma. Conclusion: Young gastric cancer patients no longer present with more advanced disease than the elderly and, overall, survival is better in young patients.

Clinical profile of gastric cancer in Khuzestan, southwest of Iran.

To analyze the characteristics of epidemiological, clinical and survival patterns among patients with carcinoma of the stomach. We retrospectively studied the characteristics of 186 gastric adenocarcinoma patients at Ahwaz Jundishapur University Hospitals (AJSUH) from September 1, 1996 to September 1, 2002. All the patients had histopathologically-confirmed malignancy. Demographic variables, family history of gastric cancer (GC), clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment-related variables were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed with the log-rank test and multivariate analysis with Cox regression. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Male to female ratio was 2.6:1. The mean age was 60.6 years and 14% of the patients were younger than 40 years. Adenocarcinoma, gastric lymphoma, and gastric metastasis were found in 94.5%, 2.3%, and 3% patients, respectively. There was an average of 6-mo delay between the initial symptoms and the diagnosis. Among adenocarcinoma groups, intestinal type was the commonest (55.9%) and the distal third was the most common localization (88.4%). One hundred and thirty-four patients (72.1%) were males. Thirty-one patients (17%) had a family history of GC. Surgery was performed in 90% of patients (non-curative). The epidemiological features of GC in south Iran mimic those in high-risk areas. There is a higher frequency of GC in young patients at our institution. Patients are detected and treated after a relatively long delay. Most patients present in advanced stages, which favors a poor overall survival. Family history of GC has a significant problem in our area. Studying the etiology of this cancer in south Iran and earlier diagnosis and subsequent better cares are recommended.

Clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of gastric cancer in young male and female patients

The pathways of gastric cancer in young patients (40 years of age or younger) have not yet been determined. We therefore examined clinicopathologically and genetically 68 gastric cancers in young patients and 66 tumors in older patients (41 years of age or older). Mutations in B-raf and K-ras were identified by PCR-SSCP following sequencing. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and hMLH3 mutations were also examined. Histopathologically, diffuse-type gastric cancer and cancer in the whole of the stomach were found significantly more often in young patients than in older patients (21% vs. 2%, P = 0.0006, and 77% vs. 32%, P < 0.0001, respectively). Genetically, MSI and hMLH3 mutations were found significantly more often in tumors in young patients than in tumors in older patients (15% vs. 4%, P = 0.040, and 9% vs. 0%, P = 0.036, respectively). Tumors in young female patients were found significantly less often in the lower-third of the stomach and showed a significantly greater frequency of MSI, compared to tumors in young male patients (33% vs. 9%, P = 0.046, 5% vs. 30%, P = 0.010, respectively). These results suggest that the pathways of gastric carcinogenesis differ between young patients and older patients, and that the pathways differ between the sexes in young patients.

The optimal age threshold for screening upper endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, an area with a higher prevalence of gastric cancer in young adults

It is estimated that 1% to 2% of patients with dyspepsia are associated with gastric cancer. To avoid missing gastric cancer, most guidelines recommend that patients over 45 years old should undergo EGD for uninvestigated dyspepsia. In Taiwan, however, the prevalence of gastric cancer in younger patients is higher than that of Western countries. The optimal age threshold for endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to determine an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia to avoid missing gastric cancer in Taiwan. We reviewed the findings in all adult patients who underwent upper endoscopy because of uninvestigated dyspepsia at the National Taiwan University Hospital. In those patients with confirmed gastric cancer histology, further analysis was performed. Cumulative age frequency distributions for gastric cancer were calculated according to gender and to the presence or the absence of alarm features. The stages of gastric cancer also were analyzed according to the presence or the absence of alarm symptoms. During the 5-year period, a total of 17,894 patients received upper endoscopy caused by uninvestigated dyspepsia. Gastric cancer was found in 225 (12.6 cases per 1000 EGDs) patients who presented with uninvestigated dyspepsia, 135 men and 90 women. Thirty-one (13.7%) and 17 (7.6%) patients were aged less than 45 and 40 years old, respectively. Among these 225 patients with gastric cancer, 114 (50.7%) patients did not have alarm symptoms (simple dyspepsia), whereas 111 (49.3%) had alarm symptoms. About 5.3% (12/225) of gastric cancer cases would have been missed if endoscopy had been omitted in patients without alarm symptoms and aged less than 45 years. The cumulative age relative frequencies of patients with gastric cancer who presented with simple dyspepsia were 1.8 (12/6720), 1.02 (5/4920), and 0.59 (2/3411) cases per 1000 EGDs for uninvestigated dyspepsia in patients aged less than 45, 40, and 35 years, respectively. When the frequencies of gastric cancer were stratified by age and gender, we found a trend of male predominance in older patients but not in younger patients. The cutoff age was 60 years old ( p < 0.05). Early gastric cancer was detected in 9.9% (11/111) and 26.3% (30/114) of patients with and without alarm symptoms, respectively (p = 0.002). Gastric cancer is not uncommon in patients with dyspepsia aged less than 45 years in Taiwan. The age threshold of screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia should be the same for both genders in view of comparable frequencies of gastric cancer in a young age population. Because more than 5% of gastric cancer cases would be missed in Taiwan if endoscopy was omitted in simple dyspeptic patients who were aged less than 45 years, we recommend that 40 years old might be an optimal age threshold for screening endoscopy for uninvestigated dyspepsia in Taiwan, in both men and women patients.

高齢者胃癌と若年者胃癌の臨床病理学的特徴

高齢者胃癌と若年者胃癌の臨床病理学的特徴

Hereditary risk factors for the development of gastric cancer in younger patients

BackgroundIt is believed that the development of gastric cancer (GC) before the age of 50 has a hereditary basis. Blood group A and history of gastric cancer in first-degree relatives have been shown to be risk factors for GC.MethodsIn this case-control study, we enrolled patients with GC who were diagnosed before the age of 50. Patients who were diagnosed as having GC were selected. A total of 534 cases were found; of these, 44 diagnosed before the age of 50 were included in the case group. For the control group, 22 males and 22 females were randomly selected from the remaining subjects, who had diagnoses of GC after the age of 50. All the surviving patients and family members of the dead patients were interviewed about the history of cancer in the family and the age at which other family members developed cancer. The blood group of each subject was also obtained.Resultsforty-four cases under 50 years old (mean age: 36.2 years) and forty-four controls (mean age: 67.1 years) were enrolled in the study. At the time of the study, 59.1% of the study group and 50% of the control group were alive (P value = NS). In the study group, 68.1%, 13.6%, 13.6% and 4.5% had blood groups O, A, B and AB, respectively. In the control group the corresponding figures were 27.7%, 63.6%, 6.8% and 4.5%. First or second-degree relatives with cancer, including gastric (the most frequent), breast, lung, gynecological and hematological malignancies, were noted in 54.5% of the cases and 11.4% of the controls (p < 0.01). Family histories of cancer were accepted as valid provided that they were based on valid medical documents.ConclusionsIt seems that the development of GC before the age of 50 is likely to be accompanied by familial susceptibility. Interestingly, our study showed a significant correlation between blood group O and the development of gastric cancer under the age of 50.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in a young patient population.

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics of young patients with gastric cancer with special attention to hereditary gastric cancer in a tertiary referral university hospital. Charts from all patients 40 years of age or younger at the time of diagnosis, during the period from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 2001, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables, family history of gastric cancer, clinicopathologic characteristics, and treatment-related variables were analyzed. Overall survival was the main outcome variable. Survival curves were constructed by means of the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate analysis was performed with the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis with Cox regression. Significance was considered at P<0.05. During the study period, 558 cases of gastric cancer were seen at our institution, 83 (14.8%) were in patients 40 years of age or younger. Mean patient age was 33.2 years. Forty-five patients (54.2%) were male. Fourteen patients (16.9%) had a family history of gastric cancer. Five patients (6%) fulfilled the criteria of hereditary gastric cancer. Surgery was performed in 88% of patients, but only 35% of the operations had a curative intent. Operative mortality was 2.4%. On univariate analysis, advanced tumor stage, hypoalbuminemia, low performance status, diffuse type, pangastric tumor location, noncurative surgery, and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant negative impact on survival. On multivariate analysis, advanced tumor stage, pangastric tumor location, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Family history of gastric cancer or hereditary gastric cancer did not have any impact on prognosis. There is a high frequency of gastric cancer in young patients at our institution. Most patients present in advanced stages, which favors a poor overall survival. Family history of gastric cancer or hereditary gastric cancer did not have a significant impact on survival. Complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to confer the only chance of prolonged survival.

Gastric Cancer in Young Patients — Is There Any Hope for Them ?

Gastric cancer usually affects people older than sixty years. This type of cancer is very rare in adults under thirty years of age. In addition, the prognosis in this part of population is grave due to the high incidence of undifferentiated tumours and advanced stage at time of diagnosis. Radical surgery affords the only chance for long term survival, but even this option is often limited upon finding locally advanced disease or peritoneal seeding. The following are case studies of three young adults from a group of 45 patients, who were treated between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2003.

DNA copy number changes in young gastric cancer patients with special reference to chromosome 19.

Only a few cytogenetic and genetic studies have been performed in gastric cancer patients in young age groups. In the present study we used the comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) method to characterise frequent DNA copy number changes in 22 gastric cancer patients of 45 years or younger and three gastric cancer cell lines established from patients younger than 45 years. Analysis of DNA copy number changes revealed frequent DNA copy number increases at chromosomes 17q (52%), 19q (68%) and 20q (64%). To confirm the CGH results and to characterise the amplicon region on the most frequently amplified chromosome, chromosome 19, we carried out fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis and Southern blot analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone mapped to 19q12 indicated a copy number increase in all eight tumour specimens studied. Southern blot analysis of six tumour specimens and three tumour cell lines, with five probes mapped to the 19q12–13.2 region, suggested cyclin E to be one of the candidate target genes in the 19q region for gastric cancer tumorigenesis. Cyclin E protein overexpression was verified in tumours with amplification on chromosome 19. Further studies are required to investigate the biological and clinical significance of 19q amplicon and cyclin E upregulation in gastric cancer of young patients.

Gastric cancer in young patients with no alarm symptoms: focus on delay in diagnosis, stage of neoplasm and survival

Background: The test and treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori infection has raised some concern since young gastric cancer patients may have no alarm symptoms. In this study the frequency of alarm symptoms was assessed in a series of young gastric cancer patients, as well as the impact of absence of alarm symptoms on delay in diagnosis and stage of gastric cancer at diagnosis and survival. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 92 gastric cancer patients ≤ 45 years of age identified from databases in four hospitals between January 1985 and December 2001. Characteristics analysed included duration and features of dyspeptic symptoms, presence of alarm symptoms, time interval from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis, pTNM stage and survival. Results: Of the 92 patients, 54 (58.7%) presented uncomplicated dyspepsia and 38 (41.3%) alarm symptoms. In those with uncomplicated dyspepsia, epigastric pain was the most common complaint (64.1%) followed by vomiting (30.4%), heartburn and nausea. Weight loss was the most common alarm symptom (30.4%), followed by anorexia (10.9%), dysphagia or anaemia (7.6%). The mean delay from first symptoms to final diagnosis was 16.8 ± 13.9 weeks in patients with alarm symptoms and 29.3 ± 39.9 weeks in patients without alarm symptoms (P:ns). Patients without alarm symptoms showed significantly less aggressive gastric cancer compared to patients with alarm symptoms in relation to TNM stage and survival (cumulative 5‐year survival rate: 76% versus 49% P: 0.01). The survival rate, at 5 years, of patients without alarm symptoms, and with a history of dyspepsia of more than 24 weeks, was higher than that in patients with early diagnosis (93.4% versus 66.5%; P: 0.05). Conclusions: A large proportion of young gastric cancer patients present without alarm symptoms. Despite the delay in diagnosis, these patients have a better outcome than those with alarm symptoms. Thus the delay in diagnosis of patients without alarm symptoms does not affect survival.

Gastric cancer in young patients: demographic, clinicopathological, and prognostic factors in 92 patients.

This investigation was undertaken to define the demographic, clinicopathological, and prognostic factors relevant to young patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. A prospective database of all patients with gastric cancer who presented to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was started in 1985. Clinical, pathological, and operative records and follow-up data on 92 patients, 40 years of age or younger, with a primary diagnosis of gastric cancer were reviewed. The mean patient age was 35 +/- 4.9 years (range, 17-40 years), and 52 were male. The male-to-female ratio of patients younger than 30 was 0.85/1; whereas in those older than 30, the ratio was 1.45/1. Sixty-six percent of the patients were white, 15% Asian, 11% Hispanic, and 8% were black American. Nineteen percent of patients reported a family history of gastric cancer. Sixty-six patients (71%) presented with stage III or IV disease, whereas 13 patients, each, presented with stage I or II disease. Poorly differentiated lesions were present in 71%. Resection with curative intent was undertaken in 47 patients, and resection with palliative intent was performed in 24 patients. Tumor site (proximal vs. distal vs. linitus plastica), advanced T stage, and the presence of nodal disease were significant predictors of disease-free survival on both univariate and multivariate analyses. The mean survival time and disease-specific 5-year survival rates for individual Union International Contre le Cancer tumor stages were similar to those observed in older populations of patients with gastric cancer; and eight patients, who presented with early (T1/T2) node-negative tumors, are alive and well a minimum of 60 months after resection. The high frequency of a positive family history in young patients suggests an opportunity to identify a high-risk population for screening.

Microsatellite instability and/or loss of heterozygosity in young gastric cancer patients in Italy.

Gastric cancers are rarely diagnosed before the age of 40 years and the incidence reaches a peak during the 7th decade in the general population. A molecular mechanism of early tumor onset may be determined by comparing microsatellite instability (MSI), indicative of error-prone mismatch repair, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) between gastric cancers in patients < or = 40 years of age and those of older ages. Three to 5 chromosomal loci, where MSI and/or LOH are commonly found in gastric cancers in the general population, were examined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 102 patients < or = 40 years of age using a polymerase chain reaction-based non-radioactive screening method. MSI and/or LOH at a minimum of 1 locus were detected in 11/102 patients. The frequency of MSI and/or LOH at the D11S904 locus was significantly higher than that at the D2S119, D2S123, D5S409 and IFNA regions. No preferential genetic changes at the D11S904 locus were observed in elderly patients. Among several clinicopathological variables, a statistically significant association with MSI and/or LOH was observed only for tumors located at the cardia, compared with tumors at the antrum and the corpus. Our findings suggest that a unique mechanism may be involved in increasing the susceptibility of the D11S904 locus for either MSI or LOH, especially for cardia tumors in young patients. Early onset of gastric cancers in patients < or = 40 years of age is associated with genetic changes at preferential chromosomal loci, including D11S904.

Microsatellite instability and/or loss of heterozygosity in young gastric cancer patients in Italy

Microsatellite instability and/or loss of heterozygosity in young gastric cancer patients in Italy

Early gastric cancer in the young: clinicopathological study.

Thirty-four cases of early gastric carcinoma in patients under 50 years of age treated in the period from 1985 to 1995 were reviewed. These constituted 3.7% of 923 cases of gastric cancer in patients of all ages that were treated at Sendai National Hospital during the same 10-year period. Data were compared with those of 194 patients 50 years of age or older. The incidence of gastric cancer in men and women was almost the same in both groups. Tumours tended to be located distally in the stomach. Macroscopically, depressed lesions were more common in younger patients. Significant differences were observed in depth of invasion, histological type and histological growth patterns. The distinctive histological features of early gastric cancer in younger patients were a diffuse type of cancer with infiltrative tumours in the mucosal layer. The prognosis of younger patients was similar to that of older patients.

Gastric cancer in young patients

Background: Delayed diagnosis, a high rate of histologically undifferentiated types of tumors, and rapid disease progression are frequently cited as the main reasons for the poor prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients. An improved prognosis has been anticipated for young gastric cancer patients because of recent improvements in digestive tract diagnostic techniques. This retrospective study was designed to determine whether these trends have had an impact on young Japanese patients with gastric cancer, and to further elucidate differences in clinicopathologic features between elderly and young patients. Methods: From 1984 to 1995, 1654 patients with gastric cancer were admitted to our hospital. Of these, 86 patients (5.2%) were less than 40 years of age (young group). The clinicopathologic features of this young group were reviewed retrospectively, using hospital records, and compared with those of older patients (n = 499 [29.4%], 60 to 69 years of age). Results: The young group contained significantly higher percentages of female patients, epigastric pain symptoms, depressed superficial type lesions, mucosal invasion, and poorly differentiated histology; percentages of hepatic metastasis and venous invasion were lower. Survival rates for all patients and for the resected cases were significantly better in the young group (p = 0.035 and 0.017 respectively). The percentage of early stage stomach cancers for the group less than 40 years of age was 49.0% in 1984–89, but had risen to 60.9% by 1990–95. Conclusions: Early diagnosis has improved the prognosis of young gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, these data show a recent shift in stage distribution; additional prognostic improvement is anticipated for young patients with early gastric cancer.

Frequent microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in the region including BRCA1 (17q21) in young patients with gastric cancer.

It is known that nearly 5% of gastric carcinomas arise under the age of 40. To elucidate genetic alterations in these patients, we performed studies using microsatellite assay in 27 gastric cancers under 35 years of age, composed of 5 well and 22 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. We detected replication errors (RERs) in 18 (67%) of 27 tumors, but no germline mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2), except fory 3 somatic mutations in the hMLH1 gene. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at D17S855, located on chromosome 17q21 (BRCA1), was detected in 8 (40%) of 20 informative cases. In 12 (44%) of 27 cases, LOH on chromosome 17q12-21 including the BRCA1 was found in several neighboring markers in this region, while no mutation was found in the BRCA1 gene. Four (40%) of 10 scirrhous type gastric cancers exhibited wide allelic deletions on chromosome 17q12-21. These results overall suggest that young gastric cancer patients display highly frequent micro-satellite instability that might be due to defect of DNA repair system rather than hMLH1 and hMSH2. In addition, chromosome 17q12-21 including BRCA1 locus may contain a candidate for tumor suppressor gene, particularly in scirrhous type gastric cancers arising in young patients.

Gastric Cancer in Young Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection

Although several studies demonstrated the poor prognosis of young patients with gastric cancer, there were few reports about the survival of young patients who underwent radical surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 697 patients with curatively resected locally advanced gastric cancer to compare the pathologic findings and prognosis of young patients (aged < 40 years; 91 patients) with those of older (aged > or = 40 years; 606 patients) patients. There were no significant differences in location of tumors, Borrmann types, tumor invasion, and pathologic stage between both age groups. Despite the male predominance in older patients, the male-to-female ratio was nearly equal in young patients (p = 0.022). A significantly higher percentage of young patients showed poorly differentiated histology including signet ring cell and undifferentiated carcinoma than older patients (p < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently performed in the young patients with a variety of different regimens (85.7 vs. 72.3%; p = 0.009). The 5-year overall survival rate revealed no statistically significant differences between the young and older patients (53.1 vs. 56.6%; p = 0.820). In conclusion, the young patients with curatively resected locally advanced gastric cancer showed similar survival compared to that of older patients.

Gastric cancer in young patients.

A retrospective review of the Roswell Park Memorial Institute experience and literature review of gastric carcinoma in young adults reveals that long-term survival is rarely achieved. The primary correctable cause of failure is a very long delay in diagnosis, a result of both reluctance to initiate diagnostic studies and inaccuracy of routine upper gastrointestinal series. A high index of suspicion and liberal utilization of gastroscopy and gastric cytology combined with an aggressive surgical approach to gastric pathology would probably lead to improved survival for the young gastric carcinoma patients.