They tell me there's no money for schools, But I think they're telling me tales 'Cause [Michael] Bloomberg funded our [surveillance] cameras. And they always got money for jails. See what they fund schools with, and then times that by more than three, And you'll still get less than half of what they fund prisons. Huh! Wonder where they want me to be. Jorman Nunez, student, DeWitt Clinton High School, New York City Students tell me that overcrowding at Fremont [High School] makes them think that they are worthless because they rarely get any individualized attention or feedback from their teachers. ... I have seen many of the brightest students at Fremont High become emotionally withdrawn because they have to spend long periods of time waiting to get their teachers' attention. Mary Hoover, teacher, Fremont High School, Los Angeles, California The common sense made by the expert ... has given currency to one-dimensional and devastating perceptions of young people of color as anti-intellectual. In doing so, this common sense draws the public's gaze away from racially segregated, physically decaying, and crowded places where ... instruction continues to occur. ... It is the students, the expert voices emphasize, that are dysfunctional and in need of fixing rather than the school system or the social structures in which students find themselves. Gaston Alonso, Assistant Professor, Political Science, Brooklyn College, co-author with Noel S. Anderson, Celina Su, and Jeanne Theoharis, Our Schools Suck: Students Talk Back to a Segregated Nation on the Failures of Urban Education (2009). At the recent April 2009 meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), I attended the Presidential Session devoted to Bringing Education Research to Policymakers: The Academy Speaks to the New President. The panelists included former elected officials and current members of the National Academy of Education and the National Research Council. University of Pittsburgh's Lauren Resnick declared that now that the new science of reading is emerging, we would soon be able to guarantee that even would learn to read and develop proficiency. University of Michigan's Maris Vinovskis, who also has worked for several federal educational research agencies, as part of his presentation made the statement, After all this research, we still don't know how to teach disadvantaged I have heard these types of statements all too often in educational research circles so when the time came for questions and answers, I asked from the floor, Clearly, we know how to teach people to read, we don't need a new 'science of reading' for that, as witnessed by the hundreds of people in this room who taught to read by somebody! And there are numerous examples of successful educational programs with so-called disadvantaged students. Why don't we take the money now being expended on additional educational research and use it to implement those programs that have proven successful with disadvantaged children? Both Vinovskis and Resnick quick to point out that we could not possibly do that. And besides, those programs were implemented on a small scale and had a unique set of characteristics with highly motivated, specialized staff, and thus could not be implemented on a mass scale. This is a massive problem and those programs successful in a very limited application. On hearing this response, I was reminded of the statement Tonto would often make to the Lone Ranger: White man (and in this case white woman) speak with forked tongue. Here we have members of the National Academies making declarations ex cathedra, and they are sending out two opposing messages: We don't know how to teach disadvantaged children to read and achieve academically, but there are successful programs, which through some alchemical formula manage to produce high levels of academic achievement among disadvantaged children. …
Read full abstract