Years Of Denosumab Treatment Research Articles

The comparable efficacy of denosumab on bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A retrospective case-control study.

Little is known about differences in the therapeutic efficacy of denosumab in subjects with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study compares the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between RA patients and controls without RA who had been treated with denosumab for 2 years for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 82 RA patients and 64 controls were enrolled, who were refractory to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or bisphosphonates and completed the treatment of denosumab 60 mg for 2 years. The efficacy of denosumab in RA patients and controls was assessed using areal BMD (aBMD) and T-score of the lumbar spine, femur neck, and total hip. A general linear model with repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine differences in aBMD and T-score between 2 study groups. No significant differences in percent changes in aBMD and T-scores by denosumab treatment for 2 years at the lumbar spine, femur neck, and total hip were evident between RA patients and controls (P > .05 of all), except T-score of the total hip (P = .034). Denosumab treatment equally increased aBMD at the lumbar spine and T-scores at the lumbar spine and total hip between RA patients and controls without statistical differences, but RA patients showed less improvement in aBMD at the femur neck (ptime*group = 0.032) and T-scores at the femur neck and total hip than controls (ptime*group = 0.004 of both). Changes in aBMD and T-scores after denosumab treatment in RA patients were not affected by previous use of bisphosphonates or SERMs. Differences of T-score at the femur neck among previous bisphosphonate users and aBMD and T-score at the femur neck and T-scores at the total hip were evident. This study revealed that 2 years of denosumab treatment in female RA patients achieved comparable efficacy on BMD to controls at the lumbar spine, but showed somewhat insufficient improvement at the femur neck and total hip.

Long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness–adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from FREEDOM and its open-label extension

SummaryIn postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab treatment significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness–adjusted trabecular bone score, independently of bone mineral density. Long-term denosumab treatment decreased the number of high fracture-risk patients and shifted more patients to lower fracture-risk categories.PurposeTo investigate the long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness–adjusted trabecular bone score (TBSTT) in post-hoc subgroup analysis of FREEDOM and open-label extension (OLE).MethodsPostmenopausal women with lumbar spine (LS) or total hip BMD T-score <−2.5 and ≥−4.0 who completed the FREEDOM DXA substudy and continued in OLE were included. Patients received either denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 3 years and same-dose open-label denosumab for 7 years (long-term denosumab; n=150) or placebo for 3 years and open-label denosumab for 7 years (crossover denosumab; n=129). BMD and TBSTT were assessed on LS DXA scans at FREEDOM baseline, month 1, and years 1–6, 8, and 10.ResultsIn long-term denosumab group, continued increases from baseline to years 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 in BMD (11.6%, 13.7%, 15.5%, 18.5%, and 22.4%) and TBSTT (3.2%, 2.9%, 4.1%, 3.6%, and 4.7%) were observed (all P < 0.0001). Long-term denosumab treatment decreased the proportion of patients at high fracture-risk (according to TBSTT and BMD T-score) from baseline up to year 10 (93.7 to 40.4%), resulting in increases in the proportions at medium-risk (6.3 to 53.9%) and low-risk (0 to 5.7%) (P < 0.0001). Similar responses were observed in crossover denosumab group. Changes in BMD and TBSTT were poorly correlated during denosumab treatment.ConclusionIn postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by TBSTT, independently of BMD, and shifted more patients to lower fracture-risk categories.Graphical

Circulating miRNAs Respond to Denosumab Treatment After 2 Years in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis-the MiDeTe study.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs)-short, single-stranded, noncoding RNAs-regulate several biological processes, including bone metabolism. We investigated circulating miRNAs as promising biomarkers for treatment monitoring in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis on denosumab (DMAB) therapy. In this prospective, observational, single-center study, 21 postmenopausal women treated with DMAB were included for a longitudinal follow-up of 2 years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to screen for serological miRNAs at baseline, month 6, and month 24. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to confirm NGS findings in the entire cohort. Bone turnover markers (BTM) P1NP and CTX, and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual x-ray absorptiometry were assessed and correlated to miRNAs. BMD at the hip (5.5%, P = 0.0006) and lumbar spine significantly increased (11.4%, P = 0.017), and CTX (64.1%, P < 0.0001) and P1NP (69.3%, P < 0.0001) significantly decreased during treatment. NGS analysis revealed significant changes in miRNAs after 2 years of DMAB treatment but not after 6 months. Seven miRNAs were confirmed by RT-qPCR to be significantly changed during a 2-year course of DMAB treatment compared to baseline. Four of these were mainly transcribed in blood cells, including monocytes. Correlation analysis identified significant correlation between change in miRNA and change in BTMs as well as BMD. Based on effect size and correlation strength, miR-454-3p, miR-26b-5p, and miR-584-5p were defined as top biomarker candidates, with the strongest association to the sustained effect of denosumab on bone in osteoporotic patients. Two years of DMAB treatment resulted in upregulation of 7 miRNAs, 4 of which are mainly transcribed in monocytes, indicating a potential impact of DMAB on circulating osteoclast precursor cells. These changes were associated to BMD gain and BTM suppression and could therefore be useful for monitoring DMAB treatment response.

Long-term Effect of Denosumab on Bone Microarchitecture as Assessed by Tissue Thickness-Adjusted Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Results from the Freedom and Open-Label Extension (OLE)

TBS is an indirect measure of bone microarchitecture assessed on lumbar spine (LS) DXA scans and provides information beyond bone mineral density (BMD). TBS algorithm has been updated to account for regional soft tissue noise in DXA images. This retrospective analysis applied updated built-in tissue thickness-adjusted TBS algorithm to investigate the long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture in FREEDOM and OLE. This analysis included 279 postmenopausal women with LS or total hip BMD T-score <−2.5 and ≥−4.0 who completed the FREEDOM DXA sub study and continued in the OLE study: 150 women received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 3 years and same-dose open-label denosumab for 7 years (long-term denosumab group); 129 women received placebo for 3 years and open-label denosumab for 7 years (crossover denosumab group). BMD and TBS were assessed on LS DXA scans, blinded from treatment allocation, at FREEDOM: baseline, Month 1, and Years 1, 2, and 3; and at OLE: baseline, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Long-term denosumab led to significant and progressive increases in TBS over 10 years of treatment (Figure). A similar trend was observed in the crossover group during 7 years of denosumab therapy. In the long-term denosumab group, % of patients with normal microarchitecture (TBS >1.074) increased from 26.1% at baseline to 53.2% up to Year 10, and % of patients with degraded (TBS ≤1.027) or partially degraded (1.027< TBS≤1.074) microarchitecture decreased from 48.6% to 29.1% and from 25.4% to 17.7%, respectively (P < 0.0001; TBS thresholds equivalent to 1.230 and 1.310 for the classical TBS algorithm corrected for body mass index). A similar improvement in bone microarchitecture was observed in the crossover group from OLE baseline up to OLE Year 7 (P < 0.0001). Over the course of long-term denosumab treatment, TBS changes were largely unrelated to LS BMD changes: r2 was 0.05 from baseline to Year 10 in the long-term group and 0.28 from OLE baseline to OLE Year 7 in the crossover group. Up to 10 years of denosumab treatment significantly and progressively improved TBS assessment of bone microarchitecture independently of BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Bone Mass Gains After One Denosumab Injection Followed by Zoledronate

Denosumab discontinuation can lead to bone loss despite subsequent bisphosphonate therapy. This bone loss is more severe in patients treated with denosumab for longer than 3 years. We aimed to evaluate the bone mass changes after only a single denosumab injection followed by zoledronate administration. We screened all of our patients who received a single denosumab injection and who were included in the osteoporosis register from the Swiss Society of Rheumatology between August 1, 2010, and January 31, 2022. This case series assessed the outcome of patients who were consecutively treated with one denosumab injection followed by a single infusion of zoledronate 6 months later. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) changes were analysed before therapy and 18 months later. Percentage BMD changes and T-scores were compared with those of registered patients who received 2.5 years of denosumab treatment and one subsequent infusion of zoledronate. Thirty-two patients (31 female, 1 male) received a single denosumab injection and one zoledronate infusion 6 months later. BTM decreased significantly in this period (p = 0.035). Percentage BMD changes from baseline to 1 year after zoledronate treatment were 7.6% [IQR 3.2, 9.4] at the lumbar spine, 3.5% [1.8, 5.9] at the total hip and 4.6% [1.3, 6.0] at the femoral neck. In contrast, percentage changes from baseline in 110 patients with 2.5 years of denosumab treatment and one zoledronate infusion were 5.6% [3.0, 9.1], 2.3% [0.2, 4.9] and 2.3% [−0.9, 4.7], respectively. Differences between the 2 groups were significant at the lumbar spine (p = 0.014), total hip (p = 0.010) and femoral neck (p = 0.010).A single denosumab injection followed by zoledronate led to a remarkable gain of BMD at the lumbar spine and hip within a short time. This observation could help to identify a new short treatment sequence for patients with osteoporosis.

Three-year results of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in women with rheumatoid arthritis and primary osteoporosis: A clinical observational study

Introduction This study investigated the results of 3 years of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and primary osteoporosis (PO). Materials and methods This study enrolled 112 women with RA (RA group) and 104 women with a PO group who received 60 mg denosumab for 3 years. Bone mineral densitiy (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck as well as levels of bone turnover markers [N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b)] were measured at years 1, 2, and 3. Results The percent changes (Δ) in BMD values at years 1, 2, and 3 were as follows: RA group: 6.7 ± 6.2%, 8.9 ± 6.5%, and 9.8 ± 8.2% and PO group: 6.0 ± 4.8%, 8.9 ± 7.5%, and 12.6 ± 8.7% for the lumbar spine; RA group: 4.5 ± 4.6%, 5.2 ± 5.1%, and 6.8 ± 5.9% and PO group: 3.8 ± 4.5%, 4.6 ± 7.4%, and 6.8 ± 4.6% for the total hip; and RA group: 2.7 ± 5.1%, 4.1 ± 6.8%, and 4.3 ± 6.7% and PO group: 3.6 ± 8.0%, 4.5 ± 10.9%, and 5.7 ± 10.5% for the femoral neck, respectively. The ΔBMD for the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck as well as ΔP1NP and ΔTRACP-5b did not differ significantly between the two groups at any time points. Conclusion Denosumab treatment for osteoporosis had a similar efficacy over 3 years among women with RA and PO. A better understanding of denosumab treatment for this patient population is important in clinical practice.

P0894AEFFECTS OF DENOSUMAB ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND LOW ENERGY FRACTURES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS: SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

Abstract Background and Aims Fractures are a disabling clinical outcome after kidney transplantation (KTx), with incidence 5 to 34 times higher expected in males and females, respectively. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to RANKL with high affinity and specificity, blocking the interaction of RANKL with RANK, mimicking the endogenous effects of osteoprotegerina, increase bone mineral density; however, its effects to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures and ameliorate BMD remain undefinite in the KTx. Method Thirteen kidney recipients (aged from 50 to 79 yy, 6.2 + 5.5 (SD) yy after KTx), 6 M and 7 F (all postmenopausal) with nearly normal renal function (creat. 1.1+-0.31 mg/dl), affected by low energy vertebral fractures (21 dorsal and 1 lumbar vertebrae), evaluated by morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic DQR-4500A), were treated with denosumab (four 60-mg doses of denosumab Q6M) over 24 months. Data for vertebral heights and height ratios (P-A), covering 9 vertebral bodies were obtained, besides the data of vertebral, femural and radius BMD.The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of CNI (TAC or CsA), MMF and 8 out of 13 patients were still taking prednisone. Bone mineral metabolism parameters (whole-PTH, 25OHD3 and alcaline phosphatase) were also evaluated. Results No sides effects were observed, and all Patients concluded the study.After two years of denosumab treatment, we observed a significative reduction of vertebral T-score (from -2.12 +- 0.35 (SE) to -1.67+-0.35; p&amp;lt; .02), while T score of femural and radius did not show significative variation (-1.86+-0.21 versus -1.84+- 0.23 and -3.04+-0.42 versus -3.19+-0.45, respectively). The number of low energy vertebral fractures, basal versus two years control, had increased for only two dorsal vertebral fractures. However, to one of two subjects, with new dorsal vertebral fractures, was administered high dose of methylprednison for a severe kidney reject. No variations were observed in whole-PTH (89.31+-19.9 versus 68.38+-9.8 pg/ml), 25OHD3 (24.02+-2.75 versus 26.67+-2.29 ug/dl) and alcaline phosphatase (78.46+-12.73 versus 56.77+-7.14 UI). Conclusion Treatment with denosumab improve BMD at vertebral site in KTx, despite continuous steroid therapy and reduce the risk of new low energy vertebral fractures

Response to Letter to the Editor: "Further Nonvertebral Fracture Reduction Beyond 3 Years for Up to 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment".

Response to Letter to the Editor: "Further Nonvertebral Fracture Reduction Beyond 3 Years for Up to 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment".

Letter to the Editor: "Further Nonvertebral Fracture Reduction Beyond 3 Years for Up to 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment".

Letter to the Editor: "Further Nonvertebral Fracture Reduction Beyond 3 Years for Up to 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment".

Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.

ABSTRACTAlthough treat‐to‐target strategies are being discussed in osteoporosis, there is little evidence of what the target should be to reduce fracture risk maximally. We investigated the relationship between total hip BMD T‐score and the incidence of nonvertebral fracture in women who received up to 10 years of continued denosumab therapy in the FREEDOM (3 years) study and its long‐term Extension (up to 7 years) study. We report the percentages of women who achieved a range of T‐scores at the total hip or femoral neck over 10 years of denosumab treatment (1343 women completed 10 years of treatment). The incidence of nonvertebral fractures was lower with higher total hip T‐score. This relationship plateaued at a T‐score between ‐2.0 and ‐1.5 and was independent of age and prevalent vertebral fractures, similar to observations in treatment‐naïve subjects. Reaching a specific T‐score during denosumab treatment was dependent on the baseline T‐score, with higher T‐scores at baseline more likely to result in higher T‐scores at each time point during the study. Our findings highlight the importance of follow‐up BMD measurements in patients receiving denosumab therapy because BMD remains a robust indicator of fracture risk. These data support the notion of a specific T‐score threshold as a practical target for therapy in osteoporosis. © 2019 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)

10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension

Long-term safety and efficacy of osteoporosis treatment are important because of the chronic nature of the disease. We aimed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of denosumab, which is widely used for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 FREEDOM trial, postmenopausal women aged 60-90 years with osteoporosis were enrolled in 214 centres in North America, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 60 mg subcutaneous denosumab or placebo every 6 months for 3 years. All participants who completed the FREEDOM trial without discontinuing treatment or missing more than one dose of investigational product were eligible to enrol in the open-label, 7-year extension, in which all participants received denosumab. The data represent up to 10 years of denosumab exposure for women who received 3 years of denosumab in FREEDOM and continued in the extension (long-term group), and up to 7 years for women who received 3 years of placebo and transitioned to denosumab in the extension (crossover group). The primary outcome was safety monitoring, comprising assessments of adverse event incidence and serious adverse event incidence, changes in safety laboratory analytes (ie, serum chemistry and haematology), and participant incidence of denosumab antibody formation. Secondary outcomes included new vertebral, hip, and non-vertebral fractures as well as bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and one-third radius. Analyses were done according to the randomised FREEDOM treatment assignments. All participants who received at least one dose of investigational product in FREEDOM or the extension were included in the combined safety analyses. All participants who enrolled in the extension with observed data were included in the efficacy analyses. The FREEDOM trial (NCT00089791) and its extension (NCT00523341) are both registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. Between Aug 3, 2004, and June 1, 2005, 7808 women were enrolled in the FREEDOM study. 5928 (76%) women were eligible for enrolment in the extension, and of these, 4550 (77%) were enrolled (2343 long-term, 2207 crossover) between Aug 7, 2007, and June 20, 2008. 2626 women (1343 long-term; 1283 crossover) completed the extension. The yearly exposure-adjusted participant incidence of adverse events for all individuals receiving denosumab decreased from 165·3 to 95·9 per 100 participant-years over the course of 10 years. Serious adverse event rates were generally stable over time, varying between 11·5 and 14·4 per 100 participant-years. One atypical femoral fracture occurred in each group during the extension. Seven cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported in the long-term group and six cases in the crossover group. The yearly incidence of new vertebral fractures (ranging from 0·90% to 1·86%) and non-vertebral fractures (ranging from 0·84% to 2·55%) remained low during the extension, similar to rates observed in the denosumab group during the first three years of the FREEDOM study, and lower than rates projected for a virtual long-term placebo cohort. In the long-term group, BMD increased from FREEDOM baseline by 21·7% at the lumbar spine, 9·2% at total hip, 9·0% at femoral neck, and 2·7% at the one-third radius. In the crossover group, BMD increased from extension baseline by 16·5% at the lumbar spine, 7·4% at total hip, 7·1% at femoral neck, and 2·3% at one-third radius. Denosumab treatment for up to 10 years was associated with low rates of adverse events, low fracture incidence compared with that observed during the original trial, and continued increases in BMD without plateau. Amgen.

Safety of long-term denosumab therapy for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis, characterised by progressive age-related increases in bone fragility and fracture risk, is a chronic condition that often requires many years of treatment. Data on safety and efficacy of drugs are provided by pivotal clinical trials, which are generally limited to 3 years duration; results of such studies cannot necessarily be extrapolated to longer treatment periods. Adverse effects might increase as a result of both ageing and cumulative drug exposure. Likewise, beneficial skeletal effects of the drug might not be maintained indefinitely. Furthermore, continued long-term suppression of bone turnover with potent antiresorptive agents could potentially result in weakened bone. Extension studies can provide useful information about effects of long-term treatment, although the absence of a placebo control group beyond the initial trial period, mandated by ethical considerations, and attenuation of the size of the treated population can reduce the robustness of the findings. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extensionDenosumab treatment for up to 10 years was associated with low rates of adverse events, low fracture incidence compared with that observed during the original trial, and continued increases in BMD without plateau. Full-Text PDF

Clinical Features of 24 Patients With Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: Systematic Review and Additional Cases.

We aimed to study the clinical and imaging characteristics of patients sustaining vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation. For this purpose, we conducted a computerized advanced literature search that identified 13 published cases, and we additionally included another 11 new cases from our centers. Twenty-four postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture(s) after denosumab discontinuation, experiencing 112 fractures in total, were analyzed. The mean number of fractures per patient was 4.7. The most commonly affected vertebrae were T12 and L1. All fractures occurred 8 to 16 months after the last denosumab injection. Eighty-three percent of the patients were treatment naïve, whereas 33% had prevalent vertebral fractures. Five (23%) patients were on concurrent aromatase inhibitor treatment. When patients were divided according to treatment duration with an arbitrary cut-off of 2 years, those with ≤2 years of denosumab treatment had fewer fractures compared with those with >2 years (mean ± SEM fractures 3.2 ± 0.7 versus 5.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.055). Vertebroplasty was used in 5 patients, resulting in additional clinical vertebral fractures in all cases. We conclude that vertebral fracture(s) after denosumab discontinuation are in the majority of patients multiples, and they occur a few months after the effect of the last dose is depleted. Therefore, patients should not delay or omit denosumab doses. Fractures are typically osteoporotic, located at the lower thoracic and the upper lumbar spine. Vertebroplasty is an unsuccessful treatment strategy for such patients. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Observations following discontinuation of long-term denosumab therapy

SummaryStopping denosumab after 8 years of continued treatment was associated with bone loss during a 1-year observation study in patients who were not prescribed osteoporosis treatment. Bone loss was attenuated in patients who began another osteoporosis therapy. Treatment to prevent bone loss upon stopping denosumab should be considered.IntroductionThis study aimed to understand osteoporosis management strategies during a 1-year observational follow-up after up to 8 years of denosumab treatment in a phase 2 study.MethodsDuring the observational year, patients received osteoporosis management at the discretion of their physician and returned to the clinic for BMD assessment and completion of an osteoporosis management questionnaire. Incidence of serious adverse events and fractures was collected. Analyses were descriptive.ResultsOf 138 eligible patients, 82 enrolled in and completed the observation study. Most (65 [79%]) did not receive prescription osteoporosis medication, with “my doctor felt I no longer needed a medication” being the most common reason (23 [35%]). Of the 17 patients who took osteoporosis medications, 8 discontinued therapy during the observation study. In patients treated with denosumab for 8 years (N = 52), BMD decreased during the 1-year observation study (6.7% [lumbar spine], 6.6% [total hip]). Those who took osteoporosis medication during the observation study showed a smaller decline in BMD than those who did not. No new safety concerns were identified. Eight patients (9.8%), all of whom had at least one predisposing risk factor, experienced 17 fractures. This included seven patients who experienced one or more vertebral fractures.ConclusionsConsistent with denosumab’s mechanism of action, treatment cessation led to reversal of the drug’s effect on BMD and perhaps fracture risk. For patients who took osteoporosis therapy, bone loss was attenuated. For patients at high fracture risk, switching to another osteoporosis therapy if denosumab is discontinued seems appropriate.

Bone: Sequential osteoporosis treatment--the order of things.

A recent study shows that preceding teriparatide treatment with 2 years of denosumab treatment leads to lower BMD after 4 years than either administering these interventions in the opposite order or combining them initially. However, BMD measurements could be biased in favour of using teriparatide first, owing to the time required for completion of secondary mineralization.

Three-year denosumab treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women and men with osteoporosis: results from a 1-year open-label extension of the Denosumab Fracture Intervention Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial (DIRECT).

A 12-month extension phase of DIRECT in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis showed that total 3 years of denosumab treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis was associated with low fracture rates, persistent bone turnover marker (BTM) reductions, continuous bone mineral density (BMD) increases, and a favorable overall benefit/risk profile. The DIRECT trial demonstrated that 2 years of treatment with denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months significantly reduced the incidence of vertebral fracture compared to placebo in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab treatment for up to 3 years. This study includes a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase and a 1-year open-label extension phase in which all subjects received denosumab. The data correspond to 3 years of denosumab treatment in subjects who received denosumab (long-term group) and 1 year of denosumab treatment in subjects who received placebo (cross-over group) in the double-blind phase. Eight hundred and ten subjects who completed the double-blind phase enrolled into the extension phase, and 775 subjects completed the study. All subjects received denosumab with daily supplements of calcium and vitamin D. The cumulative 36-month incidences of new or worsening vertebral fractures and new vertebral fractures were 3.8 and 2.5 %, respectively, in the long-term group. In this group, the BMD continued to increase, and the reduction in BTMs was maintained. In the cross-over group, comparable BMD increases and BTMs reductions to those of in their first year of the long-term group were confirmed. Adverse events did not show a notable increase with long-term denosumab administration. One event of osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred in the cross-over group. Three-year denosumab treatment in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis showed a favorable benefit/risk profile.

SAT0463 Effect of Eight Years of Denosumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Five-Year Results from the Freedom Extension

BackgroundDenosumab (DMAb) is an approved therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at increased risk for fracture. The effects of DMAb treatment for up to 10 years are...

Effects of Up to 5 Years of Denosumab Treatment on Bone Histology and Histomorphometry: The FREEDOM Study Extension

Denosumab reduced bone resorption, increased bone mineral density (BMD), and decreased new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the FREEDOM trial. Consistent with its mechanism of action, transiliac crest bone biopsies from subjects treated with denosumab for 1 to 3 years demonstrated reduced bone turnover that was reversible upon treatment cessation. Long-term denosumab treatment for up to 6 years in the FREEDOM extension provides sustained bone turnover reduction and continued low fracture incidence. Here, we evaluate 5 years of denosumab treatment on bone remodeling at the tissue level. Transiliac crest bone biopsies were obtained from 41 subjects (13 cross-over and 28 long-term from the FREEDOM placebo and denosumab groups, respectively) at year 2 of the FREEDOM extension, representing up to 5 years of denosumab treatment. Demographics for this subset were comparable to the overall extension cohort. The mean (SD) duration from the last denosumab dose to the first dose of tetracycline was 5.7 (0.5) months. Qualitative bone histology assessed in all biopsy samples was unremarkable, showing normally mineralized lamellar bone. Structural indices, including trabecular bone volume, number, and surface, were similar between cross-over and long-term groups. Bone resorption was decreased as reflected by eroded surface in cross-over and long-term subjects. A total of 11 of 13 (85%) cross-over subjects and 20 of 28 (71%) long-term subjects had specimens with double or single tetracycline label in trabecular and/or cortical compartments; specimens from 5 cross-over subjects and 10 long-term subjects were evaluable for dynamic trabecular bone parameters. Dynamic remodeling indices were low for both groups and consistent with reduced bone turnover with denosumab. In conclusion, denosumab treatment through 5 years resulted in normal bone quality with reduced bone turnover. These observations are consistent with its mechanism of action and associated with continued BMD increases and low fracture incidence.

The Effect of Three or Six Years of Denosumab Exposure in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Results From the FREEDOM Extension

Context:The Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) extension is evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab for up to 10 years.Objective:The objective of the study was to report results from the first 3 years of the extension, representing up to 6 years of denosumab exposure.Design, Setting, and Participants:This was a multicenter, international, open-label study of 4550 women.Intervention:Women from the FREEDOM denosumab group received 3 more years of denosumab for a total of 6 years (long-term) and women from the FREEDOM placebo group received 3 years of denosumab (crossover).Main Outcome Measures:Bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), fracture, and safety data are reported.Results:Reductions in BTMs were maintained (long-term) or achieved rapidly (crossover) after denosumab administration. In the long-term group, BMD further increased for cumulative 6-year gains of 15.2% (lumbar spine) and 7.5% (total hip). During the first 3 years of denosumab treatment, the crossover group had significant gains in lumbar spine (9.4%) and total hip (4.8%) BMD, similar to the long-term group during the 3-year FREEDOM trial. In the long-term group, fracture incidences remained low and below the rates projected for a virtual placebo cohort. In the crossover group, 3-year incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar to those of the FREEDOM denosumab group. Incidence rates of adverse events did not increase over time. Six participants had events of osteonecrosis of the jaw confirmed by adjudication. One participant had a fracture adjudicated as consistent with atypical femoral fracture.Conclusion:Denosumab treatment for 6 years remained well tolerated, maintained reduced bone turnover, and continued to increase BMD. Fracture incidence remained low.

Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension

The 3-year FREEDOM trial assessed the efficacy and safety of 60 mg denosumab every 6 months for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants who completed the FREEDOM trial were eligible to enter an extension to continue the evaluation of denosumab efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. For the extension results presented here, women from the FREEDOM denosumab group had 2 more years of denosumab treatment (long-term group) and those from the FREEDOM placebo group had 2 years of denosumab exposure (cross-over group). We report results for bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), fracture rates, and safety. A total of 4550 women enrolled in the extension (2343 long-term; 2207 cross-over). Reductions in BTMs were maintained (long-term group) or occurred rapidly (cross-over group) following denosumab administration. In the long-term group, lumbar spine and total hip BMD increased further, resulting in 5-year gains of 13.7% and 7.0%, respectively. In the cross-over group, BMD increased at the lumbar spine (7.7%) and total hip (4.0%) during the 2-year denosumab treatment. Yearly fracture incidences for both groups were below rates observed in the FREEDOM placebo group and below rates projected for a “virtual untreated twin” cohort. Adverse events did not increase with long-term denosumab administration. Two adverse events in the cross-over group were adjudicated as consistent with osteonecrosis of the jaw. Five-year denosumab treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis maintained BTM reduction and increased BMD, and was associated with low fracture rates and a favorable risk/benefit profile. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research