AbstractAn audit of work to implement the MICRO‐HOPE study findings in a UK rural practice is presented. Seventy‐three out of an eligible group of 142 who fitted the HOPE trial criteria were not taking an ACE inhibitor. Of these, 60 were invited to a special clinic session with a visiting nurse to provide an opportunity to offer ACE inhibitor treatment and follow‐up. The average age of males (n=29) and females (n=31) was 70.7 (SD 9.9) and 70.1 (SD 8.9) respectively. The mean HbA1c of the invited group was 7.64% (CI 7.33–7.95%) and mean blood pressure was 138/75mmHg (CI 134–143/73–77mmHg).Thirty‐five (58%) patients attended and 20 (33%) started taking ramipril as a result of the intervention. In the interim, three had been started on treatment by a hospital. At 12 weeks, 14 (23%) were still on treatment from the practice. Only two (10%) achieved the target dosage of 10mg ramipril daily. Six patients (30%) had side‐effects and stopped ramipril treatment. The total cost of the intervention was £3200.The nurse‐led intervention increased the appropriate ACE inhibitor usage among people with type 2 diabetes from 49% to 59% over three months. The proportion of patients on either an ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II‐receptor antagonists rose from a baseline of 56% to 65% at six months.For a brief intervention, this was a worthwhile effect. This audit shows that increasing ACE inhibitor use is resource intensive but its small scale may exaggerate the effect size. Clarity is needed around the issue of any ‘class effect’ for ACE inhibitors and how patients will cope with the increasing burden of medication. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Read full abstract