The reproducible pattern of Schistosoma mansoni infection in the rat was confirmed. A peak worm burden was reached at the 4th week after exposure and was followed by a rapid reduction in the number of adults between the 4th and 8th weeks; thereafter a low, stable worm burden level was maintained. This pattern was not altered by X-irradiation of the rats either prior to or 3 weeks after exposure to S. mansoni. Immunosuppression by thoracic duct drainage, antilymphocytic globulin (ALG), or a combination of ALG and Imuran failed to alter the susceptibility of the rat to S. mansoni infection, as determined by worm burdens present 4 weeks after infection. ALG was not able to alter the immune state of the host acquired as the result of previous infection. The transfer of serum or cells from immune donors did not confer protection to isologous recipients. Experiments in which a combination of immune serum and sensitized cells were transferred gave equivocal results. Infection with Schistosoma mansoni in the laboratory rat follows a reproducible pattern. The host responds to the infection by a rapid reduction in adult worm burden between the 4th and 8th weeks (Stirewalt et al., 1951; Ritchie et al., 1963; Smithers and Terry, 1965a, b). After the decline in worm burden, the animal is refractory to reexposure with cercariae (Ritchie et al., 1963; Sadun and Bruce, 1964; Erickson and Caldwell, 1965; Smithers and Terry, 1965b). The mechanism responsible for initiating the worm loss or for maintaining acquired immunity has not been elucidated. Maddison et al. (1970), using five serologic tests and the passive cutaneous anaphylaxis reaction, could not show a correlation between antibody development and the rapid loss of worms. Vogel and Minning (1953), working with S. japonicum in the rhesus monkey, Stirewalt and Evans (1953), working with S. mansoni in mice, and Kagan (1958), working with Schistosomatium douthitti in mice, could not demonstrate passive transfer of immunity with hyperimmune serum. Ogilvie et al. (1966) showed that intradermal injection of specific antischistosomal reaginic antibody afforded protection to rats that were exposed to cercariae placed over the antibody depot. The same type of antibody was not protective in the skin of the rhesus monkey. We have attempted to study the immune Received for publication 9 December 1969. mechanisms responsible for the elimination of worms and for the acquired immunity in the rat. Animals were subjected to immunosuppression before primary infection, and, in one instance, before secondary exposure. Hyperimmune serum, lymphocytes from immune rats, and a combination of these two factors were investigated for their ability to confer protection to normal recipients. The results of these experiments are now reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS Inbred Lewis and ACI strains of rats (obtained from Microbiological Associates), weighing 150 to 200 g, were employed. The sexes of the cell donors and respective recipients were in accord with the sex compatibility X and Y chromosomes. Randombred Sherman rats were raised in our laboratory. In each experiment, treated and control animals were exposed at the same time to 1,000 cercariae of a Puerto Rican strain of S. mansoni by the ring method, and the worm burdens were determined by perfusion following the technique used by Smithers and Terry (1965a). The rats were exsanguinated at the time of killing 4, 6, 8, 10, or 12 weeks after exposure, and the sera were stored at -20 C.
Read full abstract