The Real World of Archaeology When all U.S. government agencies received authority to expend their own funds for assessment of archaeological resources in the mid 1970s, there was an immediate necessity for archaeologists to take care of the innumerable projects by multiple agencies needing cultural resource clearance. The response, not unforeseen (Lipe and Lindsey 1974), was that a good many enterprising archaeologists went into private business, severing traditional relationships with universities and museums, and setting up companies whose sole purpose was to meet the needs of clients for archaeological expertise. It was a whole new world for archaeologists. Many were not prepared for the business world and did not survive the pressures of meeting payrolls, meeting client's needs, meeting scientific research responsibilities, meeting requirements of a multitude of new laws, and making enough profit to feed their families. But many did and have continued to survive, and we have in the United States now what Harry Piper below calls a three-party relationship: the federal or state agency required by law to see that archaeological resources (cultural resources actually) are taken into consideration before they are disturbed by any project with federal or state involvement; the archaeologist (whether in private business or associated with a public institution) who has the expertise to provide the information for that consideration; and the client-a developer or federal agency or utility company or whatever-that must have regulatory agency approval in order to pursue some kind of land modification project. But the way is still not smooth and expectations still not understood, much less met, by all parties. The archaeologist, doing research under contract, has agreed by signing that contract to do certain things by a certain time. The constraints are many, and the ability by either the archaeologist or the regulator to aaually control what happens to the resources being investigated is normally extremely limited. The possibility of continuing an interesting line of research is slight. Knowledge of the law is vital; knowledge of the requirements, the potential, and the limits on archaeological investigations is basic to meeting a contract, meeting the legal requirements, and meeting professional standards. And where in this relationship do the resources themselves fit in? Some of the frustrations met by two of the parties in this triangle are expressed below. These are voices of long experience speaking. Those new to this game should take heed.
Read full abstract