World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Research Articles

Impact of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist on safety culture among health workers: A randomized controlled trial in Aceh, Indonesia.

The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) to increase the application of essential birth practices to ultimately reduce perinatal and maternal deaths. We study the effects of the SCC on health workers safety culture, in the framework of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (16 treatment facilities/16 control facilities). We introduced the SCC in combination with a medium intensity coaching in health facilities which already offered at minimum basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEMonC). We assess the effects of using the SCC on 14 outcome variables measuring self-perceived information access, information transmission, frequency of errors, workload and access to resources at the facility level. We apply Ordinary Least Square regressions to identify an Intention to Treat Effect (ITT) and Instrumental Variable regressions to determine a Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE). The results suggest that the treatment significantly improved self-assessed attitudes regarding the probability of calling attention to problems with patient care (ITT 0.6945 standard deviations) and the frequency of errors in times of excessive workload (ITT -0.6318 standard deviations). Moreover, self-assessed resource access increased (ITT 0.6150 standard deviations). The other eleven outcomes were unaffected. The findings suggest that checklists can contribute to an improvement in some dimensions of safety culture among health workers. However, the complier analysis also highlights that achieving adherence remains a key challenge to make checklists effective.

Application of the PDCA cycle for implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist in women with vaginal deliveries.

The World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) has been recommended globally. However, the results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of implementing the SCC based on plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle management. From November 2019 to October 2020, women who were hospitalized and had vaginal deliveries were enrolled in this study. Before October 2020, the PDCA cycle was not applied for the SCC, and women who had vaginal deliveries were included in the pre-intervention group. From January 2021 to December 2021, the PDCA cycle was applied for the SCC, and women who had vaginal deliveries were included in the post-intervention group. The SCC utilization rate and the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications were compared between the 2 groups. The SCC utilization rate in the post-intervention group was higher than that in the pre-intervention group (P < .01). The postpartum infection rate in the post-intervention group was lower than that in the pre-intervention group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). After the intervention, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal mortality, and neonatal asphyxia rates were also reduced, although no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the third-degree perineal laceration or neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization rate between the 2 groups (P > .05). Application of the PDCA cycle can improve the SCC utilization rate, and the SCC combined with the PDCA cycle can effectively reduce the postpartum infection rate.

Knowledge and practises regarding the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist among obstetrics and gynaecology professionals—Qualitative Study

Introduction: The World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist is a supporting tool for safe delivery that is essential for maternal and perinatal care practices. It has to be well mentored with its accurate implications to the health care providers who attend the deliveries so that they can protect delivering mothers from major causes of maternal death such as haemorrhage, infection, obstructed labour, hypertensive disorders, intrapartum-related stillbirths, and neonatal deaths. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine the level of awareness about the Safe Childbirth Checklist and its accurate application among the health care providers who attend the childbirth delivery procedures. Methodology: This study is a qualitative study on knowledge and practises regarding the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist among obstetrics and gynaecology professionals. The secondary data is collected from the literature search from various electronic databases such as PubMed, Google scholar, and PubMed Central. Results: the study intellectualizes and advances the knowledge concerning the use of world health organization safe child birth checklist among nurses and other health care providers who are the attenders of child delivery procedures. Conclusion: The study brings out better awareness concerning knowledge and practise concerning the World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist that indicates safe practise concerning maternal and child safety. This suggests training programmes to enhance the quality of practise among staff nurses and other health providers among child birth professionals.

An innovative longitudinal nurse-midwife mentorship program in rural Malawi: The Global Action in Nursing (GAIN) project

The Global Action in Nursing (GAIN) project is a partnership between University of California, San Francisco, Partners In Health, and the Ministry of Health, Neno District, Malawi that aims to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality by improving the quality of perinatal care rendered by nurse-midwives. In this report, we describe the design and implementation of a nursing training and mentorship program for frontline nurse-midwives in leadership, quality improvement, and midwifery skills, including the implementation of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist and Respectful Maternity Care. Short course trainings were followed by one year of on-site clinical mentorship with the goal of improving systems factors (such as ensuring adequate availability of supplies) as well as reinforcing clinical skills.The program was implemented in Neno District, Malawi, a rural district in southwestern Malawi where approximately 5,000 births occur annually. The program is now in its fifth year of implementation and has become well-embedded in the district. Key lessons learned included stakeholder involvement; flexible and responsive program design; nurse-centered model for mentorship; and program transition to local leadership. Since nurses and midwives are the frontline providers of reproductive health care in Malawi, sustained investment in clinical and leadership training for nurse-midwives, accompanied by health systems strengthening, has the potential to improve quality deficits and therefore the health of mothers and babies in low-resource settings.

Promising practices for adapting and implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: case studies from India and Rwanda

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) was published in 2015 as a patient safety tool to improve facility-based childbirth care through boosting adherence with essential practices around the major causes of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. We brought together partners who led implementation of the SCC in India and Rwanda to: (i) contextualize the findings from surveys and interviews about SCC adaptation and implementation around the world (data published separately) with our partners’ implementation experiences in India and Rwanda, and (ii) identify promising practices for SCC implementation. Methods We identified two partners–one from Tamil Nadu, India and one from Masaka District, Rwanda–to work together in identifying key promising practices regarding the SCC based on their direct experiences and data we collected from other implementers around the world. From June-September 2020, we held 4 virtual design workshops using brainwriting exercises to explore promising practices for adaptation and implementation of the SCC. We consolidated the implementation experiences in India and Rwanda into the WHO SCC Implementation Guide phases of Engage, Launch, and Support, and included two additional phases: Project Design and Evaluation. Results We present two case studies of SCC implementation that demonstrate improved adherence with essential birth practices after implementation of the SCC. Based on the case studies, we developed promising practices according to five implementation stages: Project Design, Engage, Launch, Support, and Evaluation. Clarifying the purpose and users of the tool, applying human-centered design principles, and developing evaluation plans for the specified purpose were some promising practices that emerged. Conclusions Our partnership with direct implementers of the SCC yielded important insights about how to adapt, implement, evaluate, and sustain use of the Checklist. Such partnerships are critical in building an evidence base for promising practices regarding SCC implementation around the world.

Effects of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist on Quality of Care and Birth Outcomes in Aceh, Indonesia

To address major causes of perinatal and maternal mortality, the World Health Organization developed the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC), which to our knowledge has been rigorously evaluated only in combination with high-intensity coaching. To evaluate the effect of the SCC with medium-intensity coaching on health care workers' performance of essential birth practices. This cluster randomized clinical trial without blinding included 32 hospitals and community health centers in the province of Aceh, Indonesia (a medium-resource setting) that met the criterion of providing at least basic emergency obstetric and newborn care. Baseline data were collected from August to October 2016, and outcomes were measured from March to April 2017. Data were analyzed from January 2020 to October 2021. After applying an optimization method, facilities were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group (16 facilities each). The SCC with 11 coaching visits was implemented during a 6-month period. For the primary outcome, clinical observers documented whether 36 essential birth practices were applied at treatment and control facilities at 1 or more of 4 pause points during the birthing process (admission to the hospital, just before pushing or cesarean delivery, soon after birth, and before hospital discharge). Probability models for binary outcome measures were estimated using ordinary least-squares regressions, complemented by Firth logit and complier average causal effect estimations. Among the 32 facilities that participated in the trial, a significant increase of up to 41 percentage points was observed in the application of 5 of 36 essential birth practices in the 16 treatment facilities compared with the 16 control facilities, including communication of danger signs at admission (treatment: 136 of 155 births [88%]; control: 79 of 107 births [74%]), measurement of neonatal temperature (treatment: 9 of 31 births [29%]; control: 1 of 20 births [5%]), newborn feeding checks (treatment: 22 of 34 births [65%]; control: 5 of 21 births [24%]), and the rate of communication of danger signs to mothers and birth companions verbally (treatment: 30 of 36 births [83%]; control: 14 of 22 births [64%]) and in a written format (treatment: 3 of 24 births [13%]; control: 0 of 16 births [0%]). In this cluster randomized clinical trial, health facilities that implemented the SCC with medium-intensity coaching had an increased rate of application for 5 of 36 essential birth practices compared with the control facilities. Medium-intensity coaching may not be sufficient to increase uptake of the SCC to a satisfying extent, but it may be worthwhile to assess a redesigned coaching approach prompting long-term behavioral change and, therefore, effectiveness. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN11041580.

Effectiveness of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO-SCC) in preventing poor childbirth outcomes: a study protocol for a matched-pair cluster randomized control trial

BackgroundWomen delivering in health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa and their newborns do not always receive proven interventions needed to prevent and/or adequately manage severe complications. The gaps in quality of care are increasingly pointed out as major contributing factor to the high and slow declining perinatal mortality rates. The World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO-SCC), as a quality improvement strategy, targets low cost and easy to perform interventions and suits well with the context of limited resource settings. In this matched-pair cluster randomized controlled trial, we assess the effectiveness of the WHO-SCC in improving healthcare providers’ adherence to best practices and ultimately improving childbirth outcomes.MethodsThis is a multi-country study. In each country we will carry out a matched-pair cluster randomized controlled trial whereby four pairs of regional hospitals will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to either the intervention or control group. A context specific WHO-SCC will be implemented in the intervention facilities along with trainings of healthcare providers on best childbirth practices and ongoing supportive supervisions. The standard of care will prevail in the control group. The primary outcome is a summary composite metric that combine the following poor childbirth outcomes: stillbirths, maternal deaths, early neonatal deaths, severe postpartum hemorrhage, maternal infections, early neonatal infections, prolonged obstructed labor, severe pre-eclampsia, uterine rupture in the health facility, eclampsia and maternal near miss. The occurrence of these outcomes will be ascertained in a sample of 2530 childbirth events in each country using data extraction. A secondary outcome of interest is the adherence of healthcare providers to evidence best practices. This will be measured through direct observations of a sample of 620 childbirth events in each country.DiscussionOur study has the potential to provide strong evidence on the effectiveness of the WHO-SCC, a low cost and easy to implement intervention that can be easily scaled up if found effective.Trial registrationThe trial was registered in the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry on 21st January 2020 under the following number: PACTR202001484669907. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=9662

Using the WHO safe childbirth checklist to improve essential care delivery as part of the district-wide maternal and newborn health quality improvement initiative, a time series study

BackgroundCare bundles are a set of three to five evidence-informed practices which, when performed collectively and reliably, may improve health system performance and patient care. To date, many studies conducted to improve the quality of essential birth care practices (EBPs) have focused primarily on provider- level and have fallen short of the predicted impact on care quality, indicating that a systems approach is needed to improve the delivery of reliable quality care.This study evaluates the effect of integrating the use of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO-SCC) into a district-wide system improvement collaborative program designed to improve and sustain the delivery of EBPs as measured by “clinical bundle” adherence over-time.MethodsThe WHO-SCC was introduced in the context of a district-wide Maternal and Newborn Health (MNH) collaborative quality of care improvement program in four agrarian Ethiopia regions. Three “clinical bundles” were created from the WHO-SCC: On Admission, Before Pushing, and Soon After Birth bundles. The outcome of each bundle was measured using all- or- none adherence. Adherence was assessed monthly by reviewing charts of live births.A time-series analysis was employed to assess the effectiveness of system-level interventions on clinical bundle adherence. STATA version 13.1 was used to analyze the trend of each bundle adherence overtime.Autocorrelation was checked to assess if the assumption of independence in observations collected overtime was valid. Prais-Winsten was used to minimize the effect of autocorrelation.FindingsQuality improvement interventions targeting the three clinical bundles resulted in improved adherence over time across the four MNH collaborative. In Tankua Abergele collaborative (Tigray Region), the overall mean adherence to “On Admission” bundle was 86% with β = 1.39 (95% CI; 0.47–2.32; P < 0.005) on average monthly.Similarly, the overall mean adherence to the “Before Pushing” bundle in Dugna Fango collaborative; Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s (SNNP) region was 80% with β = 2.3 (95% CI; 0.89–3.74; P < 0.005) on average monthly.ConclusionUsing WHO-SCC paired with a system-wide quality improvement approach improved and sustained quality of EBPs delivery. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the impact on patient-level outcomes.

Adaptation and implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist around the world

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) published the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist in 2015, which included the key evidence-based practices to prevent the major causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality during childbirth. We assessed the current use of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) and adaptations regarding the SCC tool and implementation strategies in different contexts from Africa, Southeast Asia, Europe, and North America.MethodsThis explanatory, sequential mixed methods study—including surveys followed by interviews—of global SCC implementers focused on adaptation and implementation strategies, data collection, and desired improvements to support ongoing SCC use. We analyzed the survey results using descriptive statistics. In a subset of respondents, follow-up virtual semi-structured interviews explored how they adapted, implemented, and evaluated the SCC in their context. We used rapid inductive and deductive thematic analysis for the interviews.ResultsOf the 483 total potential participants, 65 (13.5%) responded to the survey; 55 completed the survey (11.4%). We analyzed completed responses from those who identified as having SCC implementation experience (n = 29, 52.7%). Twelve interviews were conducted and analyzed. Ninety percent of respondents indicated that they adapted the SCC tool, including adding clinical and operational items. Adaptations to structure included translation into local language, incorporation into a mobile app, and integration into medical records. Respondents reported variation in implementation strategies and data collection. The most common implementation strategies were meeting with stakeholders to secure buy-in, incorporating technical training, and providing supportive supervision or coaching around SCC use. Desired improvements included clarifying the purpose of the SCC, adding guidance on relevant clinical topics, refining items addressing behaviors with low adherence, and integrating contextual factors into decision-making. To improve implementation, participants desired political support to embed SCC into existing policies and ongoing clinical training and coaching.ConclusionAdditional adaptation and implementation guidance for the SCC would be helpful for stakeholders to sustain effective implementation.

Safe birth matters: facilitators and barriers to uptake of the WHO safe childbirth checklist tool in a Tanzania Regional Hospital

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Safe Birth Checklist (SCC) to facilitate best practices in safe birthing practices. The SCC is utilizing existing evidence-based WHO guidelines and recommendations which has combined those into a single and practical bedside tool. The SCC is the first checklist-based intervention to target the pre- vention of maternal and neonatal deaths.&#x0D; Objective: The objective of this project was to pilot-test the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist with Maternity Regional Hospital in, Tanzania.&#x0D; Study Design and Methods: Retrospective analysis on 35 charts were completed to identify presence or absence of docu- mentation aligned with evidenced based checklist items. Staff training, end user observations and focus group discussions were utilized to elicit feedback about the tool and the process. Descriptive statistics and manual content analysis were used to analyze the rate of uptake and ownership over the checklist. The Checklist is broken down into four sections or time points (that are considered natural pause points in the care of laboring women). The four different pause points are admission, delivery, post-partum, and discharge.&#x0D; Results: We trained 26 participants out of 32 staff how to use the SCC. Delivery time point had the lowest at SCC comple- tion rate at 39% compared to discharge having the highest completion rate at 93%. There was variation in completion rate of the checklist items at each time point. Checklist items at the beginning of each time point were completed between 94% and 100% of the time with the latter checklist list items completed between 29% and 57% of the time.&#x0D; Conclusion: This project was able to identify facilitators and potential barriers to the successful uptake of the Safe Child- birth Checklist in Shinyanga Regional Hospital. Based on these findings, the MOH have opportunities to utilize those find- ings in the scale-up of the implementation of the checklist and future evaluation activities.&#x0D; Keywords: Safe birth matters; WHO safe childbirth checklist tool; Tanzania Regional Hospital.

Safe birth matters: facilitators and barriers to uptake of the WHO safe childbirth checklist tool in a Tanzania Regional Hospital.

The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Safe Birth Checklist (SCC) to facilitate best practices in safe birthing practices. The SCC is utilizing existing evidence-based WHO guidelines and recommendations which has combined those into a single and practical bedside tool. The SCC is the first checklist-based intervention to target the prevention of maternal and neonatal deaths. The objective of this project was to pilot-test the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist with Maternity Regional Hospital in, Tanzania. Retrospective analysis on 35 charts were completed to identify presence or absence of documentation aligned with evidenced based checklist items. Staff training, end user observations and focus group discussions were utilized to elicit feedback about the tool and the process. Descriptive statistics and manual content analysis were used to analyze the rate of uptake and ownership over the checklist. The Checklist is broken down into four sections or time points (that are considered natural pause points in the care of laboring women). The four different pause points are admission, delivery, post-partum, and discharge. We trained 26 participants out of 32 staff how to use the SCC. Delivery time point had the lowest at SCC completion rate at 39% compared to discharge having the highest completion rate at 93%. There was variation in completion rate of the checklist items at each time point. Checklist items at the beginning of each time point were completed between 94% and 100% of the time with the latter checklist list items completed between 29% and 57% of the time. This project was able to identify facilitators and potential barriers to the successful uptake of the Safe Childbirth Checklist in Shinyanga Regional Hospital. Based on these findings, the MOH have opportunities to utilize those findings in the scale-up of the implementation of the checklist and future evaluation activities.

IMPACT OF UTILIZING THE WHO SAFE CHILDBIRTH CHECKLIST ON REDUCING MATERNAL AND PERINATAL DEATH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) is a 29-item checklist designed to address the primary cause of maternal death, intrapartum stillbirth, and early neonatal death. The objective of this review was to locate literature reporting on the effect of utilizing the WHO safe childbirth checklist on maternal and perinatal death. Methods We searched MEDLINE, google scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), met-Register of Controlled Trials (m-RCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/stop/search/en) to retrieve all available comparative studies published in English after 2008. Two reviewers did study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction independently. We did a random or fixed-effect meta-analysis to pool studies together and effect estimates were expressed as an odds ratio. Quality of evidence for major outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Results We retained two cluster randomized trials and three pre-and-post intervention studies reporting on WHO SCC's. The WHO SCC utilization reduced still birth (OR =0.92[95% CI 0.87-0.96]). However, the utilization of the checklist had no impact on early neonatal death (OR=1.07[95%CI [1.01-1.13]) and maternal death (OR =1.06[95% CI 0.77-1.45]). Conclusions Moderate quality of evidence indicates that WHO SCC reduces stillbirth, whereas low and very low quality of evidence suggests that WHO SCC has no impact on maternal and early neonatal death, respectively. Therefore, it is imperative to use a structured checklist for intrapartum follow-up of labour and delivery. Keywords: Maternal health, Newborn health, WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist, maternal mortality, perinatal mortality.

Implementing a modified World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist in health centers of Ethiopia: a pre and post intervention study

BackgroundChildbirth is a complex process, and checklists are useful tools to remember steps of such complex processes. The World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist is a tool used to improve the quality of care provided to women giving birth. The checklist was modified by Ministry of Health and was introduced to health centers in Ethiopia by the USAID Transform: Primary Health Care Activity.MethodsA pre and post intervention study design with prospective data collection was employed. The availability of essential childbirth supplies and adherence of health care providers to essential birth practices were compared for the pre and post intervention periods.ResultsThe pre and post intervention assessments were conducted in 247 and 187 health centers respectively. A statistically significant improvement from 63.6% pre intervention to 83.5% post intervention was observed in the availability of essential childbirth supplies, t (389.7) = − 7.1, p = 0.000. Improvements in adherence of health care providers to essential birth practices were observed with the highest being at pause point three (26.2%, t (306.3) = − 10.6, p = 0.000) followed by pause point four (21.1%, t (282.5) = − 8.0, p = 0.000), and pause point two (18.2%, t (310.8) = − 9.7, p = 0.000). The least and statistically non-significant improvement was observed at pause point one (3.3%, t (432.0) = − 1.5, p = 0.131).ConclusionImprovement in availability of essential childbirth supplies and adherence of health care providers towards essential birth practices was observed after introduction of a modified World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist. Scale up of the use of the checklist is recommended.

Principled Subpopulation Analysis of the Betterbirth Study and the Impact of WHO's Safe Childbirth Checklist Intervention

Background: World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Safe Childbirth Checklist as an intervention to improve care and outcomes in maternal and newborn health. In the primary BetterBirth traditional trial analysis, the intervention did not significantly improve . However, a novel subgroup-based analysis could identify subpopulations that benefited from the intervention. Methods: In this work, we employ data-driven analysis methods to identify differentiated subgroups with unexpected characteristics compared to the average population. Specifically, we aim to identify: 1) vulnerable subgroups and 2) subpopulation in the intervention arm with significantly reduced outcome. The method utilizes the existing subset scanning literature that searches over a combination of features to identify the differentiated groups. Findings: We found that low birthweight (<2.5Kg) found to represent the highest vulnerable group in both control (OR: 2·04, 95% CI: 1·91-2·18, p-value<0.001) and intervention (OR: 2·07, 95% CI: 1·93-2·21, p-value <0·001) arms. Mother-baby dyads described by normal gestational age at birth, known parity, and unknown number of abortions were found to benefit from the Checklist intervention resulting 2·6% neonatal death in the intervention arm compared to 3·66% in the control arm (OR: 0·7, 95% CI: 0·62,0·79, p-value <0·001). Interpretation: The flexibility of this data-driven approach helps to answer other subgroup-based queries in the broader global health domain. Though the statistical significance of these data-driven findings is validated, their clinical significance shall not be assumed without expert validation. Funding: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provided funding for this study. Declaration of Interest: No conflicts of interest Ethical Approval: Institutions that provided review include Community Empowerment Lab, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Population Services International, the WHO, and the Indian Council of Medical Research.

Feasibility study on the adoption of the WHO safe childbirth checklist by front-line healthcare providers and managers in Burkina Faso and C\xf4te d\u2019Ivoire

BackgroundThe World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist tool was specifically designed for developing countries such as sub-Saharan African countries, to ensure safety and security of the couple mother and newborn around the time of childbirth. However, the implementation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool requires a good knowledge of the context setting to face challenges. Our study objectives were (1) to assess the acceptability of the WHO SCC tool and (2) to identify conditions and strategies for a better introduction and use of the WHO SSC tool.MethodsThis was a pilot multi-country study conducted from January to March 2019 in Burkina Faso and Côte d’Ivoire, respectively, in the health regions of central-North and Agnéby-Tiassa-Mé. In each health region, 5 health facilities of different levels within the health system pyramid were selected through a purposive sampling. The study was conducted in 2 phases: 38 healthcare providers and 15 managers were first trained to use the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool; secondly, the trained providers were allowed to use the tool in real-life conditions for 2 weeks. Then, semi-structured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers and managers. The topics covered by the interview guides were acceptability of the tool, barriers and facilitators to its use, as well as strategies for better introduction and use within the healthcare system. Analysis was carried out using the Nvivo 12 software.ResultsRespondents reported an overall good acceptance of using the tool. However, they suggested minor content adaptation. The design of the tool and increased workload were the main barriers to its use. Potential facilitators to its introduction were managers’ commitment, healthcare providers’ motivation, and the availability of supplies. The best strategies for optimal use were its attachment to existing tool such as partograph or/and its display in the maternity ward.ConclusionsThe findings showed that the implementation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool is acceptable in Burkina Faso and Côte d’Ivoire. These findings are important and will help to design a trial aiming at assessing the effectiveness of the tool WHO SCC tool in these two countries.

Who's your coach? The relationship between coach characteristics and birth attendants' adherence to the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist.

Background: Research demonstrates that coaching is an effective method for promoting behavior change, yet little is known about whichattributes of a coach make them more or less effective. This post hoc, sub-analysis of the BetterBirth trial used observational data to explore whether specific coaches' and team leaders' characteristics were associated with improved adherence to essential birth practices listed on the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist. Methods: A descriptive analysis was conducted on the coach characteristics from the 50 BetterBirth coaches and team leaders. Data on adherence to essential birth practicesby birth attendants who received coachingwerecollected by independent observers. Bivariate linear regression models were constructed, accounting for clustering by site, to examine the association between coach characteristics and attendants' adherence to practices. Results: All of the coaches were female and the majority were nurses. Team leaders were comprised of both males and females; half had clinical backgrounds. There was no association between coaches' or team leaders' characteristics, namely gender, type of degree, or years of clinical training, and attendants' adherence to essential birth practices. However, a significant inverse relationship was detected between the coach or team leader's age and years of experience and the birth attendants' adherence to the checklist. Conclusion: Younger, less experienced coaches were more successful in promoting essential birth practicesadherence in this population. More data is needed to fully understand the relationship between coaches and birth attendants.

Effectiveness of utilizing the WHO safe childbirth checklist on improving essential childbirth practices and maternal and perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) is a 29-item checklist based on essential childbirth practices to help health-care workers to deliver consistently high quality maternal and perinatal care. The Checklist was intended to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality and address the primary cause of maternal death, intrapartum stillbirth, and early neonatal death. The objective of this review was to locate international literature reporting on the effectiveness of utilizing the WHO safe childbirth checklist on improving essential childbirth practices, early neonatal death, stillbirth, maternal mortality, and morbidity. We searched MEDLINE, google scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), met-Register of Controlled Trials (m-RCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/stop/search/en) to retrieve all available comparative studieshttp://www.opengrey.eu/ published in English after 2008. Two reviewers did study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction independently. We did a random or fixed-effect meta-analysis to pool studies together and effect estimates were expressed as an odds ratio. Quality of evidence for major outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, development, and evaluation(GRADE). We retained three cluster randomized trials and six pre-and-post intervention studies reporting on WHO SCC's. The WHO SCC utilization improved quality of preeclampsia management(moderate quality of evidence) (OR = 7.05 [95% CI 2.34-21.29]), maternal infection management(moderate quality of evidence) (OR = 7.29[95%CI 2.29-23.27]), Partograph utilization(moderate quality of evidence) (OR = 3.81 [95% 1.72-8.43]), postpartum counselling(low quality of evidence) (RR = 132.51[95% 49.27-356.36]) and still birth(moderate quality of evidence) (OR = 0.92[95% CI 0.87-0.96]). However, the utilization of the checklist had no impact on early neonatal death (very low quality of evidence) (OR = 1.07[95%CI [1.01-1.13]) and maternal death (low quality of evidence) (OR = 1.06[95% CI 0.77-1.45]). Moderate quality of evidence indicates that WHO SCC utilization is effective in reducing stillbirth and Improving preeclampsia management, maternal infection management and partograph utilization Low quality of evidence indicates that WHO SCC is effective in enhancing postpartum danger sign counseling. Low and very low quality of evidence suggests that WHO SCC has no impact on maternal and early neonatal death, respectively.

The WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist implementation: impact on the prescription of magnesium sulphate through a one-year longitudinal study

BackgroundPreeclampsia is a relatively frequent condition during pregnancy and childbirth. The administration of magnesium sulphate as a prophylactic and treatment measure is an evidence-based practice for eclampsia; however, it is not consistently used, compromising the health of pregnant women. This study aimed to assess compliance with recommendations of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) for the use of MgSO4 in pregnant women with preeclampsia, before and after the implementation of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC).MethodsThis quasi-experimental study was conducted between July 2015 and July 2016 at a third-level maternity hospital in northeastern Brazil, where the SCC was implemented. Compliance (underuse and overuse of MgSO4) was assessed in biweekly samples of 30 deliveries assessed 6 months before and 6 months after SCC implementation, using indicators based on international guidelines. A total of 720 deliveries were assessed over 1 year using an ad hoc application for reviewing medical records. Aggregated adequate use was estimated for the study period, and the time series measurements were compared to a control chart to assess change.ResultsThe incidence of preeclampsia was 39.9% (287/720). Among these, 64.8% (186/287) had severe signs or symptoms and needed MgSO4. Underuse (no prescription when needed) of MgSO4 was observed in 74.7% (139/186) of women who needed the drug. Considering all women, non-compliance with the prescription protocol (underuse and overuse) was 20.0% (144/720). After introducing the SCC, the use of MgSO4 in women with preeclampsia with severe features increased from 19.1 to 34.2% (p = 0.025). Longitudinal analysis showed a significant (p < 0.05) ascending curve of adequate use of MgSO4 after the SCC was implemented.ConclusionsCompliance with recommendations for the use of MgSO4 in preeclampsia was low, but improved after implementation of the SCC. Interventions to improve compliance based on diagnosis and treatment reminders may help in the implementation of this good practice.

Mothers\u2019 experiences of quality of care and potential benefits of implementing the WHO safe childbirth checklist: a case study of Aceh Indonesia

BackgroundIn an effort to mitigate missed opportunities to provide high-quality care, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) to support health providers perform essential tasks. Our qualitative study is a baseline assessment of quality of care (QoC) perceived by mothers who gave birth at health facilities aiming to highlight areas where implementing the SCC can potentially improve the QoC as well as areas that are not part of the SCC yet require improvement.MethodsAssessing the overall experience of care, our qualitative study focuses on 8 out of 29 items in the checklist that are related to the personal interactions between healthcare provider and mothers. Using a set of semi-structured questions, we interviewed 26 new mothers who gave institutional births in Aceh province in Indonesia.ResultsOur findings revealed some gaps where implementing the SCC can potentially improve safety and QoC. They include communicating danger signs at critical points during birth and after discharge, encouraging breastfeeding, and providing mothers with information on family planning. Moreover, taking a qualitative approach allowed us to identify additional aspects such as need for clarity at the point of admission, maintaining dignity, and protecting mothers’ rights in the decision-making process to be also essential for better QoC.ConclusionsOur study highlights the need to actively listen to and engage with the experiences of women in the adaptation and implementation of the checklist. While our findings indicate that implementing the SCC has the potential to improve the quality of maternal care and overall birth experience, a more holistic understanding of the lived experiences of women and the dynamics of their interactions with health facilities, care providers, and their birth companions can complement the implementation of the checklist.

Adaptation and validation for Colombia of the WHO safe childbirth checklist

Introduction: Most maternal deaths that occur in developing countries are considered unfair and can be avoided. In 2008, The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a checklist for childbirth care, in order to assess whether a simple, low-cost intervention had an impact on maternal and neonatal mortality in low-income countries.&#x0D; Objective: To translate, adapt and validate the content of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) for its use in Colombia Methods: The checklist was translated and adapted to the Colombian context. It was subsequently validated by a panel of experts composed of 17 health workers with experience in maternal and neonatal care and safety. Reliability among judges was estimated (Rwg) and items were modified or added to each section of the list according to the results.&#x0D; Results: Modifications were made to 28 items, while 19 new items were added, and none was removed. The most important modifications were made to the management guidelines included in each item, and the items added refer to risks inherent to our environment.&#x0D; Conclusion: The Colombian version of the SCC will be a useful tool to improve maternal and neonatal care and thereby contribute to reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in our country.