MANY eminent biologists seem to think that there are insuperable difficulties in the way of sound biological instruction in public schools. Possibly my experience in this connection may be of interest. I began to teach biology some ten years ago. Two years' experience satisfied me “that the power of repeating a classification of animals with all the appropriate definitions has any thing to do with genuine knowledge is one of the commonest and most mischievous delusions of both students and their examiners.” For the third year I prepared a series of laboratory notes sufficient for the dissection of a few plants and animals. Since the publication of Huxley and Martin's admirable text-book of biology we have used that as a laboratory guide. Through the liberality of the School Board we are provided with eight of Beck's students' microscopes. We begin with the study of the torula; we then take in succession the following organisms:—Protococcus, amœba, bacteria, mould, stone-wort, ferns, flowering plants, infusorian fresh-water polyp, clam lobster, and frog. We devote to laboratory work one hour daily for seven months. At the end of the course come morphological and physiological generalisations. Our classes number about eighty, and are divided into working sections of sixteen each. The average age of the students is sixteen years, rather more than half of them being girls. I have found the students eager and enthusiastic, and a large majority of them regret the untimely end of their study of biology. To enter college a lad needs between four and five years' work in Latin, and, if a scientific student, about five weeks in botany. Most of our high schools accept this estimate of the value of a scientific training, and only do the little that is necessary for the pass examination.
Read full abstract