The Fabian Society's recent diamond jubilee celebration in London, delayed two years by the war, has centered widespread attention upon the accomplishments credited to the unusual group of socialists which laid the somewhat uncertain beginnings of Fabianism in 1884, and nurtured it to the present state of influence in British affairs.' The founding fathers included Sidney and Beatrice Webb, ardent political scientists; George Bernard Shaw, equally entranced with the writing of dramas and the discussion of social injustices; Annie Besant, actively engaged in the organization of women workers; Graham Wallas, stimulating lecturer and teacher; and a number of other middle-class persons who endowed British socialism with a characteristic non-Marxian pattern. Actually, the Fabian Society drew its initial impetus from an American, Thomas Davidson, who was visiting England in the eighties and trying to arouse interest in social problems. Davidson's socialism was ethical and individual rather than economic and political. After his return to the United States the group founded by him split into two sections, one, the Fellowship of the New Life, quickly vanishing from the scene, while the other, although composed of fewer than 40 members, emerged with little trace of Davidson's influence as the Fabian Society. The name chosen for the society was that of Fabius Cunctator, a Roman general noted for his delaying action. The motivating force behind Fabianism has emphasized that its main mission lies more in ideas than in organization. In pursuit of this ideal, the society has tried to evolve practical proposals for the reformation of blatant economic, political, and social maladies along broad socialist lines, and to encourage persons in key government positions to secure implementation of the more valuable suggestions. Fabians since the turn of the century have believed in permeation in making Britain socialist, by concentrating an adequate number of persons in important positions in vital fields and by urging all citizens to study the principles of socialism and to propose their general adoption. Although at the time of its inception two rival socialist organizations existed in London, both professing, in contrast to the Fabian Society, to be working-class groups, Fabianism succeeded because it devoted its efforts to middle-class persons in order that they might plan socialist units for all classes. At the same time, it accepted rather than superseded the existing political organizations which it intended to imbue with the socialist conception of human society. It professed no belief in class-war slogans, aiming to secure gradual and general acceptance of