Survey data were collected from 102 client-counselor dyads at 3 counseling centers with regard to (a) client and counselor 3rd-session working alliance ratings, (b) quality of clients' current social relationships, as evidenced by social-support satisfaction, and (c) clients' representations of care and overprotection in their memories of childhood emotional bonds with their mothers and fathers. Care pertains to memories of parents' emotional responsiveness, warmth, and attention to clients' needs. Overprotection pertains to memories of parents' intrusive control and resistance at attempts to gain independence. Results indicated that social support was a significant predictor of client-rated working alliance, whereas clients' bonds with fathers were a significant predictor of counselor-rated working alliance. A trend toward interactions between social support and parental bonds in predicting counselor-rated alliance was also suggested. The working alliance, with conceptual origins in psychodynamic theory (cf. Sterba, 1934; Zeitzel, 1956), has been proposed as a part of the counseling relationship that is crucial to successful outcome regardless of the theoretical underpinnings of the therapy (Bordin, 1979, 1980). Drawing from the work of Greenson (1967) and Bordin (1979), Gelso and Carter (1985) described the working alliance as an emotional alignment between the counselor and the client that engages the self-observing, rational aspects of the client and the working, therapizing aspects of the counselor. Bordin (1979) suggested that the working alliance is composed of emotional bonds of trust and attachment between counselor and client, as well as agreement about the goals of treatment and the therapeutic tasks needed to achieve those goals. Evidence documenting the importance for successful therapy outcome of the counseling relationship in general (Orlinsky & Howard, 1986), and the working alliance in particular (for reviews see Gaston, 1990; Horvath & Symonds, 1991), continues to accumulate. Some studies have reported quite strong associations, with the working alliance accounting for up to 30%-45% of the variance in therapeutic outcome (Horvath & Greenberg, 1989). A recent meta-analysis reported a more modest, but nevertheless significant, effect size averaged across 24 studies (Horvath & Symonds, 1991). Although the bulk of previous research has examined the working alliance as a predictor of therapy outcome, more attention has been given recently to predictors of the working alliance itself, with studies of factors that affect counselors' capacity to form working alliances (Mallinckrodt & Nelson, 1991), as
Read full abstract