Working Alliance In Psychotherapy Research Articles

The Impact of Clients\u2019 and Therapists\u2019 Characteristics on Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome

This article investigates distances between therapists and their clients in their experience of the therapeutic alliance across the duration of the psychotherapeutic treatments in a naturalistic study. We looked at the working alliances from different vantage points—rupture, repair of ruptures, distances in the alliance impressions of both clients and therapists—and their correlation with treatment outcome. The only predictive variable of alliance ruptures was the inability of therapists to bond sufficiently with their clients regarding a sustainable working atmosphere, which could be identified through a continuous distant alliance rating by the therapists. Alliance ruptures in turn significantly predicted premature termination of treatments, whereas alliance ruptures per se did not necessarily predict treatment outcome. The paper discusses the possible role of the quality of therapists’ attachment styles as a potentially crucial variable in an effective working alliance in psychotherapy.

A first look at the working alliance in psychotherapy with American Indians.

We could find no published studies measuring the working alliance in outpatient psychotherapy with American Indians. Given that the working alliance has been shown to be one of the most reliable and robust predictors of outcome across psychotherapeutic modalities, we sought to understand the working alliance in this population. Eight psychotherapists in an urban outpatient clinic rated their working alliance with American Indian patients (n = 112) immediately after treatment delivery using the Working Alliance Inventory, 12-item short form (Tracey & Kokotovic, 1989). Working alliance data from 112 sessions were collected and compared with data from the Working Alliance Inventory, 12-item short form, normative sample (Busseri & Tyler, 2003). Therapist-rated working alliance in psychotherapy with American Indian patients was higher than a comparison sample. Alliance was unaffected by patient, therapist, or therapy-related variables in this sample. The working alliance is likely to be an important construct in psychotherapy with American Indian patients. Replication with a larger, representative group of therapists as well as the collection of patient and observer ratings are important next steps. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Basic psychological needs satisfaction, working alliance, and early termination in psychotherapy

The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction and working alliance in psychotherapy and to determine whether client ratings of basic needs and working alliance during psychotherapy were associated with early termination of therapy. Former psychotherapy clients (n = 87) completed a semi-structured interview regarding basic needs satisfaction in therapy, working alliance and dropout status. Participant ratings on the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Psychotherapy scale (BNSP) and the Retrospective Working Alliance Inventory – Short (RWAI-S) were significantly correlated (r = .77) in our sample. A comparison of intercorrelations between working alliance subscales and basic needs subscales indicated higher factorial distinctiveness within the basic needs measure. T-tests comparing those who terminated psychotherapy early with those who had planned endings on scores on the BNSP and RWAI-S were significant (Cohen’s d = .65 and 1.82, respectively). Results suggest that the basic needs measure might tap into a wider breadth of the therapist and client interaction than the RWAI-S.

Stages of change and the working alliance in psychotherapy

This study investigated whether the working alliance mediates between the stages of change and symptom improvement. It also investigated whether progression to a higher stage of change was associated with an enhancement in working alliance and outcome scores. Fifty-six adult clients receiving counseling at a community mental health clinic completed measures after the first, fifth, and termination sessions. Using the Baron and Kenny (1986) and bootstrapping procedures, the working alliance was found to be a mediating variable. A multivariate analysis of variance indicated that clients who progressed from a lower stage to a higher stage reported stronger working alliances and more symptom improvement than those who did not progress. These results offer further support for the importance of a strong working alliance in psychotherapy.