Work Disability In Patients Research Articles

Pain expectancy and work disability in patients with acute and chronic pain: A test of the fear avoidance hypothesis

According to the fear avoidance model, prolonged disability among patients with chronic nonmalignant pain is due, in part, to an exaggerated fear of pain. At issue in the present study was an attempt to refine the fear-avoidance hypothesis by eliciting estimates of anticipated pain as well as anticipated injury. Along with scores on the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Work (FABQ-W), a validated measure of fear avoidance, pain and injury expectancies were used as predictors of work disability in a hierarchical regression model. We also examined the possibility that fear avoidance might be confined to patients with chronic pain and thus fail to account for work impairment after the onset of acute injury or illness. Samples of patients with acute (N = 47) and chronic (N = 56) pain completed a battery of psychological tests. Pain and injury expectancies collectively explained 40% to 35% of the variance in work disability compared with 12% to 10% explained by the FABQ-W for the acute and chronic samples, respectively. After controlling for pain duration, depression, somatization, and current pain severity, pain expectancy alone accounted for 16% of the variance in patients in the chronic group (P < .001) and 33% of the variance in patients in the acute group (P < .001). Both pain and injury expectancies were associated equally with work disability for patients in the acute group (P < .001), but only pain expectancy accounted for variance in the chronic group (P < .001). Fear-avoidance beliefs, in the form of cognitive expectancies, may have as much influence on the duration of disability in patients with acute pain as they do in patients with chronic pain. © 2001 by the American Pain Society

Lower level of education in young adults with arthritis starting in the early adulthood

An appropriate education may lead to less work disability in patients with arthritis. The aim of the study was to determine the educational level in two groups of young adults with arthritis. Patients with juvenile arthritis (JA, n = 32) and patients with early adult onset of arthritis (EA, n = 47) were examined with the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and a questionnaire concerning education and profession counselling. Comparisons with a reference group (n = 95) from the general population were made. The EA group had lower level of education (p< 0.01), compared to the reference group. Among the EA patients, 62% had not discussed their choice of occupation with anybody, compared to 19% in the JA group. The educational level was lower in patients with rheumatic disease starting in early adulthood. Educational issues and counselling should be focused on the care of young adults with arthritis.

Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain

Pain-related work disability can be influenced by a number of medical, physical, and psychosocial factors. The present study investigated the role of perceived disability, occupational stress, pain, and distress in patients with chronic pain disorders who work despite pain and patients who are work disabled. A total of 165 patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain treatment center for chronic pain (> 6 months) were studied. The two groups were compared on age, gender, education, marital status, duration of pain problem, pain severity, psychological distress, perceived disability, and perception of the work environment. A discriminant function analysis was computed entering pain severity, distress, perceived disability (physical and psychosocial) and work environment variables. The two groups were equivalent on age, gender, education, marital status, and duration of pain problem. The groups differed on diagnosis and insurance coverage with the work-disabled group diagnosed with low back pain and receiving Workers Compensation coverage more frequently than working controls. Univariate analyses indicated that the work-disabled group reported higher pain severity, perceived physical and psychosocial disability, and job stress than their working cohorts. The discriminant function analysis indicated that the perception of physical disability, supervisor support, distress, and work pressure were capable of correctly classifying patients with chronic pain who continued to work from those who were work disabled. These findings indicate the importance of evaluating perceived disability and job stress, and if present, directing intervention effort at these factors in order to facilitate work re-entry.