Within-session Changes In Responding Research Articles

Effects of an activity-based anorexia procedure on within-session changes in nose-poke responding

This study tested the effects of an activity-based anorexia (ABA) procedure on within-session changes in responding. In the ABA group (N=8), rats were given a 60-min feeding session and allowed to run in a running wheel for the remainder of each day. During the daily 60-min feeding session, each nose-poke response was reinforced by a food pellet. In the control group (N=8), rats experienced the same procedure except that the wheel was locked and thus rats could not run. The experiment lasted for 6 days. Rats in the ABA group consumed less and lost more body weight than those in the control group. Within-session decreases in nose-poke responding were steeper for ABA than control rats. In addition, response rates were well described as linear functions of the cumulative number of reinforcers in both groups (r2s>.96). The regression lines for the ABA group had steeper slopes and smaller x-axis intercepts than those for the control group. However, the y-axis intercepts of the regression lines were similar for the two groups. These effects were different from the effects of taste-aversion learning induced by post-session wheel running (Aoyama, 2007), suggesting a different mechanism in each preparation.

Stimulus change dishabituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers

The present experiment examined whether habituation contributes to within-session decreases in operant responding for water reinforcers. The experiment asked if this responding can be dis-habituated, a fundamental property of habituated behavior. During baseline, rats' lever pressing was reinforced by water on a variable interval 15-s schedule. During experimental conditions, rats responded on the same schedule and a new stimulus was introduced for 5 min at 15, 30 or 45 min into the 60-min session. The new stimulus was extinction, continuous reinforcement or flashing lights in different conditions. Rate of responding primarily decreased within the session during baseline. Introducing a new stimulus sometimes suppressed (extinction, continuous reinforcement) and sometimes increased (flashing lights) responding while it was in effect. The new stimulus increased responding after it ended and before it was presented in the session. The results are incompatible with the idea that non-habituation satiety factors (e.g., cellular hydration and blood volume) contributed to within-session changes in responding. These satiety factors should increase with increases in consumption, decrease with decreases in consumption and remain constant with constant consumption of water. Nevertheless, all stimulus changes increased operant responding for water. These results support the idea that habituation contributes to within-session decreases in responding for water reinforcers.

The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.

Pigeons' keypecking was reinforced by food on baseline schedules of multiple variable interval (VI) x VI x and on contrast schedules of multiple VI x VI y. Deprivation of food was varied by maintaining subjects at 75%, 85%, and 95% (+/- 2%) of their free-feeding weights. Positive and negative behavioral contrast were observed. The size of the contrast was not systematically altered by changes in deprivation. Positive and negative contrast were both larger later in the session than they were earlier. Within-session decreases in responding were steeper for the baseline than for the contrast schedules for positive contrast. Within-session decreases were steeper for the contrast than for the baseline schedules for negative contrast. These results were predicted by the idea that different amounts of habituation to the reinforcer during the baseline and contrast schedules contribute to behavioral contrast. The results show that contrast occurs under conditions that reduce the effect of the following component. The results support the assumption that positive and negative contrast are produced by symmetrical theoretical variables.

Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: parameters of Herrnstein's (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order.

Six male Wistar rats were exposed to different orders of reinforcement schedules to investigate if estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) single-operant matching law equation would vary systematically with schedule order. Reinforcement schedules were arranged in orders of increasing and decreasing reinforcement rate. Subsequently, all rats were exposed to a single reinforcement schedule within a session to determine within-session changes in responding. For each condition, the operant was lever pressing and the reinforcing consequence was the opportunity to run for 15 s. Estimates of k and R(O) were higher when reinforcement schedules were arranged in order of increasing reinforcement rate. Within a session on a single reinforcement schedule, response rates increased between the beginning and the end of a session. A positive correlation between the difference in parameters between schedule orders and the difference in response rates within a session suggests that the within-session change in response rates may be related to the difference in the asymptotes. These results call into question the validity of parameter estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) equation when reinforcer efficacy changes within a session.

Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.

Pigeons and rats responded on fixed-ratio schedules with requirements ranging from 5 to 120 responses. Consistent with past results from several schedules and procedures, responding usually changed systematically within experimental sessions. The within-session changes were usually larger and were less symmetrical around the middle of the session for schedules that provided higher, rather than lower, rates of reinforcement. These results suggest that similar variables contribute to within-session changes in responding under different schedules. When an economic demand function was fit to the data, the intensity and elasticity of demand for food and the percentage of the variance accounted for decreased within sessions, although the trend for elasticity did not reach statistical significance for pigeons. These results suggest that relatively short sessions should be used to study economic demand in open economies and that demand may differ at different times in a session and in sessions of different lengths. Within-session changes in intensity, but not necessarily elasticity, of demand are consistent with behavioral economic theories.

Within-Session Patterns of Pigeons' General Activity

The study investigates the idea that within-session changes in responding are produced by arousal and satiation. General activity, measured by the displacement of floor panels, was used as an index of these variables. In Experiment 1, pigeons pecked a key on a simple variable-interval schedule and general activity was also recorded. In Experiment 2, pigeons received response-independent reinforcers. In Experiment 3, the pigeons' general activity was reinforced on a variable-interval schedule. Although significant within-session changes in operant key pecking were observed in Experiment 1, within-session changes in general activity were seldom observed in either Experiment 1 or Experiment 2. Significant within-session changes in general activity were observed in Experiment 3, when activity was the operant. The present results can potentially be explained by arousal and satiation. However, the predictive power of this explanation is severely limited. Regardless of whether one accepts arousal and satiation as the theoretical explanation for within-session changes in responding, the present results suggest that aspects of the response–reinforcer relation may determine the within-session pattern of responding.

Exposure to context may contribute to within-session changes in responding

Rats and pigeons responded on multiple variable interval 30-s variable interval 30-s and multiple variable interval 60-s variable interval 60-s schedules. The 60-min sessions began 0, 5, 10, 15 or 30 min after the subject was placed in the experimental enclosure, determined randomly. Early-session response rates were usually higher, and the early-session increases in responding were usually smaller, when the beginning of the session was delayed than when it was immediate. These results show that factors related to reinforcement (e.g. satiation, sensitization-habituation to the reinforcers) do not provide a complete explanation for within-session changes in operant responding. Instead, an additional factor, possibly arousal or sensitization to the experimental context, also contributes. The results suggest an explanation for the spontaneous recovery of extinguished behavior.

The effects of stopping and restarting a session on within-session patterns of responding

Rats pressed levers for sweetened condensed milk reinforcers delivered according to a multiple variable-interval 1-min, variable-interval 1-min schedule during 60-min baseline sessions. The obtained pattern of responding was an early-session increase in responding followed by a relatively constant rate of responding during the remainder of the session. In the experimental conditions of experiment 1, sessions were interrupted by a blackout or timeout lasting either 5, 10, or 30 min. Responding following 5- or 10-min interruptions resembled the constant rate of responding late in the baseline sessions. However, responding increased before 30-min interruptions and increased again after the interruption. This change in the pattern of responding was best described as a `restarting' of the within-session pattern of responding. In experiment 2, a 30-min blackout interrupted sessions. However, reinforcers were presented intermittently during the blackout. Responding did not restart following the 30-min blackout-with-reinforcers condition. These results suggest that the mere presentation of reinforcers is sufficient to maintain within-session changes in responding.

Altering Reinforcer Variety or Intensity Changes the Within-Session Decrease in Responding

Operant responding often changes systematically within experimental sessions. McSweeney, Hinson, and Cannon (1996) argued that sensitization and habituation produce within-session changes in responding. The present study tested two predictions of the sensitization–habituation explanation. In two experiments, rats pressed a lever for reinforcers delivered by a multiple variable interval 15-s variable interval 15-s schedule. In Experiment 1, the variety of reinforcers delivered during the session was manipulated by varying the percentage of programmed reinforcers replaced with qualitatively different reinforcers from 0 to 75%, in five different conditions. In Experiment 2, the intensity of the reinforcer was manipulated by varying the concentration of sucrose in the sucrose and water solution used as the reinforcer from 0 to 30%, in five different conditions. Increasing the variety or the intensity of the reinforcers slowed the within-session decrease in responding. The results are consistent with the predictions of a sensitization–habituation explanation of within-session changes in responding.

Within-session patterns of responding with changes in the variability and probability of food delivery

The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.

Within-Session Changes in Adjunctive and Instrumental Responding

Rats pressed levers for food delivered by several fixed interval schedules. A drinking spout or running wheel was also available during some conditions, but not during others. The rate of lever pressing, drinking and running often changed within experimental sessions. The within-session patterns of lever pressing did not differ when drinking or running was available and when it was not. The correlation between the amount of lever pressing and the amount of drinking or running at a particular time in the session was inconsistently positive or negative. Finding within-session changes in responding for adjunctive behaviors implies that the factors that produce these changes are present for both adjunctive and instrumental behavior. Finding inconsistent correlations between instrumental responding and adjunctive behaviors questions arousal and interference from adjunctive behaviors as explanations for within-session changes in instrumental responding.

Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary

Three pigeons responded on variable interval 60-second and variable interval 30-second schedules. The duration of access to mixed grain was varied from 2-to 20-seconds per reinforcer in different conditions. Within-session patterns of responding did not differ when subjects received 2- versus 20-seconds access to the reinforcer for the schedule providing the lower rate of reinforcement. However, the within-session decreases in responding were steeper when reinforcers were 20-seconds than when they were 2-seconds for the schedule providing the higher rate of reinforcement. These results indicate that satiation is not necessary to produce within-session changes in responding, but it may contribute to those changes at high rates of reinforcement.

Prospective factors contribute little to within-session changes in responding

Five rats pressed levers for food delivered by a multiple variable interval 1-min variable interval 1-min schedule. In theunpredictable conditions, sessions were 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 min long, determined randomly at the beginning of each session. In thepredictable conditions, each of these session durations was presented for 15 consecutive sessions. Rate of responding changed systematically within the session even when the end of the session was unpredictable. This implies that prospective factors related to anticipation of the end of the session are not necessary for producing withinsession changes in responding. Within-session patterns of responding were also similar for the predictable and unpredictable conditions. This suggests that prospective factors contributed little to the form of the within-session patterns under the present conditions.

The generality of within-session patterns of responding: Rate of reinforcement and session length

Rats and pigeons responded for food delivered according to multiple schedules. The session length varied from 10 to 120 min, and the programmed rate of reinforcement varied from 15 to 240 reinforcers per hour. Response rates usually changed systematically within experimental sessions. For both rats and pigeons, responding reached a peak after an approximately constant amount of time since the beginning of the session, regardless of session length. When rats, but not pigeons, served as subjects, the peak rates of responding occurred later in the session and the within-session changes were smaller for lower than for higher rates of reinforcement. The similarities between the results for rats and for pigeons when session length varied suggest that at least one of the factors that produces the within-session changes in responding is shared by the present species, responses, and reinforcers. The differences in results when rate of reinforcement varied are more difficult to interpret.

The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding

Four pigeons pecked keys for food reinforcers delivered by variable interval 1-min schedules during two successive 50-min sessions or one 100-min session. When 50-min sessions were conducted, they were separated by a 0-, 10- or 30-min delay, spent either inside or outside of the experimental enclosure. Responding usually increased to a peak and then decreased within sessions. This pattern was not altered by either the length of the delay between sessions or by the place where the subjects spent the delay. These results suggest that the beginning of the session or the passage of a short time between sessions restores the conditions necessary to produce within-session changes in responding. The results are incompatible with theories that explain these changes in terms of recovery from the handling routine, accumulation of arousal, priming, fatigue, or satiation. They can be reconciled with theories that attribute within-session changes in responding to reinstatement of memory or changes in attention only by arguing that memory and attentional adjustments are erased quickly between sessions.