Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal Research Articles

Factors Influencing the Withdrawal of Antiepileptic Drugs in Adult Patients with Symptomatic Seizures Secondary to Neuronal Surface Antibodies-Associated Autoimmune Encephalitis

PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical characteristics, seizure outcomes, and the potential factors influencing the withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adult patients with symptomatic seizures secondary to neuronal surface antibody (NSAb)-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AE).Patients and MethodsEighty-one patients (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with NSAb-associated AE were included in this retrospective study. After at least 1 year of follow-up, clinical details, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, electroencephalography (EEG) data, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, and the therapeutic outcomes were analyzed. Patients who needed long-term AEDs to control seizures were divided into two groups (withdrawal ≤1 year and withdrawal >1 year). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors affecting the AEDs’ withdrawal in patients with seizures secondary to NSAb-associated AE.ResultsDuring the 12-month follow-up after AEDs’ withdrawal, 28 (44.4%) patients among the 63 patients who needed long-term AEDs stopped AEDs within 1 year, while 35 (55.6%) patients continued AEDs treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that delayed immunotherapy, status epilepticus (SE), and elevated intrathecal Immunoglobulin G synthesis rate of 24 hours (24-h intrathecal IgG) were independent risk factors for delayed withdrawal in patients with seizure secondary to NSAb-associated AE (odds ratios: 1.129, 6.497, 3.415, P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of delayed immunotherapy, SE, and elevated 24-h intrathecal IgG was 0.816 (95% CI=0.711–0.921, P<0.001).ConclusionDelayed immunotherapy, status epilepticus and elevated 24-hour intrathecal IgG synthesis rate are the factors that may influence the decision to delay AEDs’ withdrawal.

Rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs.

The ideal objective of treating a person with epilepsy is to induce remission (free of seizures for some time) using antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and withdraw the AEDs without causing seizure recurrence. Prolonged usage of AEDs may have long-term adverse effects. Hence, when a person with epilepsy is in remission, it is logical to attempt to discontinue the medication. The timing of withdrawal and the mode of withdrawal arise while contemplating withdrawal of AEDs. This review examines the evidence for the rate of withdrawal of AEDs (whether rapid or slow tapering) and its effect on seizure recurrence. This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2020. To quantify risk of seizure recurrence after rapid (tapering period of three months or less) or slow (tapering period of more than three months) discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs in adults and children with epilepsy who are in remission, and to assess which variables modify the risk of seizure recurrence. For the latest update, on 8 November 2021, we searched: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid), and SCOPUS. There were no language restrictions. CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized, controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), CENTRAL, and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated withdrawal of AEDs in a rapid or slow tapering after varying periods of seizure control in people with epilepsy. Two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data. The outcomes assessed included seizure freedom after one, two, or five years of AED withdrawal; time to recurrence of seizure following withdrawal; occurrence of status epilepticus; mortality; morbidity due to seizure, such as injuries, fractures, and aspiration pneumonia; and quality of life (assessed by validated scale). There are two included studies in this review. One study randomized 57 children with epilepsy with seizure freedom for at least two years to taper down the AED over one or six months. The study was not blinded and there were no details of randomization. Over the period of 54 months of follow-up, 20/30 participants in the one-month group remained seizure-free compared to 15/27 participants in the six-month group (no evidence of a difference). There was no information on time of seizure recurrence for each group to allow a comparison. The other study involved 149 children. There was a non-significant trend towards a lower risk of seizure recurrence after one year of AED withdrawal in participants allocated to slow tapering (risk ratio (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.01; P = 0.06; very low-certainty evidence). At the end of two years, 30 participants were seizure free in the rapid-tapering group and 29 participants in the slow-tapering group (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.29; P = 0.48; very low-certainty evidence). At the end of five years, 10 participants were seizure free in the rapid-tapering group and six participants in the slow-tapering group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.65; P = 0.49; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data for the other outcomes. Due to the methodological heterogeneity and the difference in the duration of tapering, we did not perform a quantitative synthesis of these studies. Currently, one Italian trial is ongoing that is investigating if a slow or a rapid withdrawal schedule of AEDs influences return of seizures (relapse) in adults with focal or generalized epilepsy who have been seizure free for at least two years (no preliminary results available). In view of methodological deficiencies, and small sample size of the two included studies, we cannot draw any reliable conclusions regarding the optimal rate of tapering of AEDs. Using GRADE, we assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low for outcomes for which data were available. We judged both studies to be at an overall high risk of bias. Further studies are needed in adults and children to investigate the optimal rate of withdrawal of AEDs and to study the effects of variables such as seizure types, aetiology, intellectual disability, electroencephalography abnormalities, presence of neurological deficits, and other comorbidities on the rate of tapering.

Frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges in slow sleep with relapse of tonic-conical seizures in adults with generalized epilepsy after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs

Frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges in slow sleep with relapse of tonic-conical seizures in adults with generalized epilepsy after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs

Эпилепсия и церебральный паралич: клиническая синдромология, исходы и прогноз

Objective of the Review: To analyze modern scientific research on clinical syndromology, genetic factors of epilepsy and cerebral palsy (CP), therapeutic tactics and outcomes. Key points. Multiple genetic factors contribute to the emergence of CP. With CP, low birth weight, neonatal seizures, epileptic seizures during the first year of life, a burdened family history of epilepsy, the severity of CP and the presence of changes in neuroimaging are associated with the risk of developing epilepsy. Children with CP may have Otahar, West, Lennox — Gastaut, syndromes-focal epilepsy of childhood with structural brain changes and benign epileptiform discharges in EEG — FECSB-BEDC. The selection of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy and CP is determined by the epileptic syndrome, cognitive, motor manifestations and side effects of the drug. Most of the failures of remission occur within the first year after discontinuation of therapy. Failure of remission is associated with a greater likelihood of subsequent development of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Conclusion. Video EEG monitoring and spectral analysis of bioelectric activity of the brain can be of great importance for optimizing the management of patients with CP and epilepsy. In addition, the search for EEG criteria for the withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with a combination of CP and epilepsy, as well as predictors of failure of remission, remains relevant. Keywords: cerebral palsy, epilepsy, clinical syndromology, genetic factors, prognosis.

Epilepsy surgery for low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor of temporal lobe: a single-institution experience of 61 patients

BackgroundLow-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor (LEAT) is highly responsive to surgery in general. The appropriate surgical strategy remains controversial in temporal LEAT. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical seizure outcome of temporal LEAT, focusing on the aspects of surgical strategy.MethodsSixty-one patients from a single epilepsy center with temporal LEAT underwent surgery. The surgical strategy was according to the multidisciplinary presurgical evaluation. Electrocorticogram (ECoG)-assisted resection was utilized. Surgical extent including lesionectomy and extended resection was described in detail. Seizure outcome was classified as satisfactory (Engel class I) and unsatisfactory (Engel classes II–IV).ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 36.0 (30.0) months, 83.6% of patients achieved satisfactory outcome, including 72.1% with Engel class Ia. There was 39.3% (24/61) of patients with antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Use of ECoG (χ2 = 0.000, P > 0.1), preresection spike (χ2 = 0.000, P = 0.763), or spike residue (P = 0.545) was not correlated with the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, outcome from lesionectomy was comparable to extended resection (χ2 = 0.499, P > 0.1). For mesial temporal LEAT, 94.7% (18/19) of patients who underwent additional hippocampectomy were satisfactory, whereas only 25% (1/4) of patients who underwent lesionectomy were satisfactory (P = 0.009).ConclusionSurgical treatment was highly effective for temporal LEAT. ECoG may not influence the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, lesionectomy with or without cortectomy was sufficient in most patients. For mesial temporal LEAT, extended resection was recommended.

Prescription preferences of antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients: An international survey among EANO members.

BackgroundThis study aimed at investigating antiepileptic drug (AED) prescription preferences in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) among the European neuro-oncology community, the considerations that play a role when initiating AED treatment, the organization of care, and practices with regard to AED withdrawal.MethodsA digital survey containing 31 questions about prescription preferences of AEDs was set out among members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO).ResultsA total of 198 respondents treating patients with BTRE participated of whom 179 completed the entire survey. Levetiracetam was the first choice in patients with BTRE for almost all respondents (90% [162/181]). Levetiracetam was considered the most effective AED in reducing seizure frequency (72% [131/181]) and having the least adverse effects (48% [87/181]). Common alternatives for levetiracetam as equivalent first choice included lacosamide (33% [59/181]), lamotrigine (22% [40/181]), and valproic acid (21% [38/181]). Most crucial factors to choose a specific AED were potential adverse effects (82% [148/181]) and interactions with antitumor treatments (76% [137/181]). In the majority of patients, neuro-oncologists were involved in the treatment of seizures (73% [132/181])). Other relevant findings were that a minority of respondents ever prescribe AEDs in brain tumor patients without epilepsy solely as prophylaxis (29% [53/181]), but a majority routinely considers complete AED withdrawal in BTRE patients who are seizure-free after antitumor treatment (79% [141/179]).ConclusionsOur results show that among European professionals treating patients with BTRE levetiracetam is considered the first choice AED, with the presumed highest efficacy and least adverse effects.

Slow tapering of anti-epileptic drugs versus rapid tapering among Sudanese epileptic patients attending Daoud Charity Clinic, Khartoum, Sudan 2019–2020

Treatment of epilepsy should be for at least two years. After successful treatment, the drug withdrawal should be gradual. This study aimed to study the rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in Daoud charity clinic in the period between January 2019 to January 2020.

P14.49 Prescription preferences of antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients: an international survey

Abstract BACKGROUND This study aimed at investigating antiepileptic drug (AED) prescription preferences in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) among the European neuro-oncology community, the considerations that play a role when initiating AED treatment, the organization of care, and practices with regard to AED withdrawal. MATERIAL AND METHODS A digital survey containing 31 questions about prescription preferences of AEDs was set out among members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO). RESULTS A total of 198 respondents treating patients with BTRE participated of whom 179 completed the entire survey. Levetiracetam was the first choice in patients with BTRE for almost all respondents (90% [162/181]). Levetiracetam was considered the most effective AED in reducing seizure frequency (72% [131/181]) and having the least adverse effects (48% [87/181]). Common alternatives for levetiracetam as equivalent first choice included lacosamide (33% [59/181]), lamotrigine (22% [40/181]), and valproic acid (21% [38/181]). Most crucial factors to choose a specific AED were potential adverse effects (82% [148/181]) and interactions with other antitumor treatments (76% [137/181]). In the majority of patients neuro-oncologists were involved in the treatment of seizures (73% [132/181])). Other relevant findings were that a minority of respondents ever prescribe AEDs in brain tumor patients without epilepsy solely as prophylaxis (29% [53/181]), but a majority routinely consider complete AED withdrawal in seizure free BTRE patients after antitumor treatment (79% [141/179]). CONCLUSION Our results show that among European professionals treating patients with BTRE levetiracetam is considered the first choice AED, with the presumed highest efficacy and least adverse effects.

Clinical Characteristics of H1N1 Influenza A-Associated Mild Encephalopathy with Reversible Splenial Lesion: 4 Pediatric Cases.

Mild encephalopathy with reversible splenial lesion (MERS) is associated with a variety of infections and anti-epileptic drug withdrawal. Here we report the clinical characteristics of H1N1 influenza A-associated MERS based on our experience of four pediatric cases. A detailed retrospective analysis of four patients with H1N1 influenza A-associated MERS was performed at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center. All patients exhibited mild influenza-like illness and seizures. Three patients presented with a new-onset seizure with fever after 5 years of age. 75% patients had altered mental status. For all four patients, influenza A (H1N1) viral RNA was detected in throat swab specimens at least twice. Brain magnetic resonance images revealed similar ovoid lesions in the corpus callosum, mainly in the splenium and for one patient in the splenium and genu of the corpus callosum. Only one patient had an abnormal electroencephalogram tracing. Cells and protein in the cerebrospinal fluid were normal in all patients. All patients received oseltamivir and one patient received intravenous immunoglobulin. As a result, all patients fully recovered after 2 months and showed no neurologic sequelae at discharge. This case series provides insight towards clinical features of H1N1 influenza A-associated MERS.

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

ObjectiveThis retrospective study investigated the success rate of withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) following stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), and identified predictors of seizure recurrence. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively assessed 65 patients who underwent SLAH for MTLE (59 lesional). Patients’ demographics, disease characteristics and post-surgical outcomes were evaluated for their potential to predict seizure recurrence associated with withdrawal of AEDs. ResultsThe mean period of observation post SLAH was 51 months (range 12–96 months) and the mean period to initial reduction of AEDs was 21 months (range 12–60 months). Reduction of AEDs was attempted in 37 patients (57 %) who were seizure free post SLAH and it was successful in approximately 2/3 of them. From the remainder 1/3 who relapsed, nearly all regained seizure control after reinstitution of their AEDs. The likelihood of relapse after reduction of AEDs was predicted only by pre-operative seizure frequency. At the end of the observation period, approximately 14 % of all SLAH patients were seizure free without AEDs and approximately 54 % remained seizure free on AEDs. Compared with preoperative status, the number of AEDs were reduced in 37 % of patients, unchanged in 51 % of them and increased in 12 % of them. ConclusionsSuccessful SLAH for MTLE allows for reduction of AEDs in a significant portion of patients and complete withdrawal of AEDs in a subset of them. Patients with higher pre-operative seizure frequency exhibit a greater chance of relapse post reduction of AEDs.

Prediction of seizure recurrence risk following discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs.

ObjectiveDiscontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in seizure‐free patients is an important goal because of possible long‐term side effects and the social stigma burden of epilepsy. The purpose of this work was to assess seizure recurrence risk after suspension of AEDs, to evaluate predictors for recurrence, and to investigate the recovery of seizure control after relapse. In addition, the accuracy of a previously published prediction model of seizure recurrence risk was estimated.MethodsSeizure‐free patients with epilepsy who had discontinued AEDs were retrospectively enrolled. The frequency of seizure relapses after AED withdrawal as well as prognosis after recurrence were assessed and the predictive role of baseline clinical‐demographic variables was evaluated. The aforementioned prediction model was also validated and its accuracy assessed at different seizure‐relapse probability levels.ResultsThe enrolled patients (n = 133) had been followed for a median of 3 years (range 0.8–33 years) after AED discontinuation; 60 (45%) of them relapsed. Previous febrile seizures in childhood (hazard ratio [HR] 3.927; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.403–10.988), a seizure‐free period on therapy of less than 2 years (HR 2.313; 95% CI 1.193–4.486), and persistent motor deficits (HR 4.568; 95% CI 1.412–14.772) were the clinical features associated with relapse risk in univariate analysis. Among these variables, only a seizure‐free period on therapy of less than 2 years was associated with seizure recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 2.365; 95% CI 1.178–4.7444). Pharmacological control of epilepsy was restored in 82.4% of the patients who relapsed. In this population, the aforementioned prediction model showed an unsatisfactory accuracy.SignificanceA period of freedom from seizure on therapy of less than 2 years was the main predictor of seizure recurrence. The accuracy of the previously described prediction tool was low in this cohort, thus suggesting its cautious use in real‐world clinical practice.

The role of brain magnetic resonance imaging on the timing of antiepileptic drugs withdrawal following mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.

Objectives:To assess the influence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings on the timing of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) withdrawal following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE).Methods:We conducted a retrospective chart review at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from Jan, 2004 – Dec, 2017 of patients with MTLE who underwent ATL and included patients who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We evaluated the association between the time required to start tapering and discontinuing AEDs after ATL in patients with Engel class I outcomes and their preoperative brain MRI.Results:We studied 64 patients who underwent ATL. The majority of patients (63%) had hippocampal sclerosis (HS) on histopathology. Following ATL, the mean time to start tapering AEDs was 10 months and AEDs were discontinued at a mean of 48 months. Abnormal brain MRI was observed in 53 (83%) patients, with findings suggestive of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) accounting for 75% of these abnormalities. The presence of any MRI abnormality was associated with a 10-month earlier tapering of AEDs (p<0.01), and an 18-month earlier complete withdrawal of AEDs (p<0.01). The odds of being seizure-free within the first year were higher if MTS was present in the brain MRI (adjusted OR=16). Similarly, this was associated with seizure freedom after the first year (adjusted OR=14.8, p<0.01). The presence of unilateral temporal IEDs on preoperative EEG were also associated with earlier tapering and discontinuation of AEDs as well as a seizure-free state after ATL surgery (OR=8.5 and 4.2, for the first and second year respectively, p<0.01).Conclusion:Patients with abnormal MRI findings and unilateral IEDs had earlier tapering of AEDs with an overall shorter AED discontinuation plan. Moreover, the presence of MTS on MRI, along with unilateral IEDs, were predictors of seizure freedom following ATL.

Does rapid withdrawal of antiseizure medication increase risk of seizure recurrence in epilepsy? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

Video Podcast: https://youtu.be/d-0qPu7CxAw

Discontinuation of preventive antiepileptic drugs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage

BackgroundThe risk factors for seizures in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) stroke and the effect of seizure prevention by anticonvulsant are not well understood. Limited studies have investigated the risk of seizure after discontinuing antiepileptic drugs in patients with ICH. This study aimed to investigate the role of valproic acid (VA) for seizure prevention and to access the risk of seizure after anticonvulsant withdrawal in patients with spontaneous ICH.MethodsBetween 2013 and 2015, 177 patients with ICH were enrolled in this 3-year retrospective study. Seizures were classified as early seizure (first seizure within 1 week of ICH), delayed seizure (first seizure after 1 week), and late seizure (any seizure after 1 week). Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline clinical factors and late seizures between study periods. VA was prescribed or discontinued based on the decision of the physician in charge.ResultsSeizures occurred in 24 patients, including early seizure in 6.78% (12/177) of the patients, delayed seizure in 7.27% (12/165) of the patients without early seizure, and late seizure in 9.60% (17/177) of the patients. Most seizures occurred within the first year. Binary logistic regression analysis showed ICH with cortex involvement as the independent risk factor for seizures. VA did not decrease the risk of seizures. Patients with ICH with cortical involvement using anticonvulsants for longer than 3 months did not have a decreased risk of seizures (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI: 0.43–8.05).ConclusionsSpontaneous ICH with cortex involvement is the risk factor for seizure. Most seizures occurred within 1 year after stroke onset over a 3-year follow up. Discontinuation of antiepileptic drug within 3 months in patients does not increase the risk of seizure.

Risk of recurrence after antiepileptic withdrawal: Was it a good decision or not?

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the demographic-clinical variables affecting idiopathic epilepsy (IE) [called genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE)] recurrence and determine cut-off values that can be used in pediatric neurology practice for children with IE/GGE. Methods: A total of 250 children and adolescents with IE/GGE were included and retrospectively evaluated. The patients’ hospital records were examined in order to identify possible electro-clinical features affecting epilepsy recurrence. Results: The overall rate of recurrence in the patients was 46%; the age at onset of seizures in recurrence group was lower (P = 0.040) and the age at last seizure was higher in the recurrence group (P < 0.001) than that in the non-recurrence group. Other factors found to be related to recurrence were the shorter duration of the seizure-free period (P = 0.030), shorter interval between the last seizure and antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal (P = 0.003), shorter duration of AED withdrawal (P = 0.005), and the existence of abnormalities on sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) during AED withdrawal (P = 0.010) and at the 6th month of withdrawal (P < 0.001). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the risk of IE recurrence was higher in children who were younger than 3.6 years old (sensitivity: 65.6%, specificity: 62.7%), children with a seizure-free period that was shorter than 35.5 months (sensitivity: 89.6%, specificity: 32.8%), and children whose drug withdrawal period was shorter than 4.5 months (sensitivity: 56.3%, specificity: 71.6%). Conclusion: This study defined some electro-clinical factors that could guide clinicians when deciding to withdraw AEDs with regard to recurrence risk after evaluating a homogenous population of children with a diagnosis of IE/GGE.

Acute withdrawal of new-generation antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy monitoring units: Safety and efficacy

IntroductionAcute withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a safe and effective approach to provoking seizures in order to complete video-electroencephalogram (V-EEG) studies in a timely manner. Previous studies have focused only on withdrawal from conventional AEDs, and the effects of withdrawal from new-generation AEDs have not been extensively studied. Materials and MethodsThis study examined adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified according to whether they received conventional AEDs (Con; n = 13) or new-generation AEDs (N-Gen; n = 26). We then compared the effects of withdrawing these two types of AEDs over a period of one week in terms of efficacy (time to complete V-EEG monitoring) and safety, including the incidence of cluster seizures (CS), focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) and status epilepticus (SE). ResultsIn both groups, approximately one week was required to complete V-EEG analysis: N-Gen group (5.6 days) and Con group (6.3 days). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the median number of seizures, the onset of the 1st seizure, the distribution of CS, FBTCS, or SE. Following acute withdrawal of medication, a high percentage of patients with a history of CS or FBTCS, respectively, presented CS or FBTCS. ConclusionsWe did not observe significant differences between patients taking new-generation AEDs and those taking conventional AEDs following withdrawal during V-EEG recording. In the current study, we employed a standard protocol for the rapid withdrawal of AEDs (daily dose reduction of 50%), which was sufficient for 80% of patients to complete V-EEG monitoring within one week.

Relation between coffee consumption and risk of seizure‐related respiratory dysfunction in patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Caffeine is an antagonist of the adenosine pathway, which is involved in regulation of breathing. Extracellular concentrations of adenosine are increased in the immediate aftermath of a seizure. Seizure-related overstimulation of adenosine receptors might promote peri-ictal apnea. However, the relation between caffeine consumption and risk of seizure-related respiratory dysfunction in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy remains unknown. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data collected in patients included in the SAVE study in Lyon's epilepsy monitoring unit at the Adult Epilepsy Department of the Lyon University Hospital between February 2016 and October 2018. The video-electroencephalographic recordings of 156 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy included in the study were reviewed to identify those with ≥1 focal seizure (FS), valid pulse oximetry (SpO2 ) measurement, and information about usual coffee consumption. This latter was collected at inclusion using a standardized self-questionnaire and further classified into four groups: none, rare (≤3 cups/week), moderate (4 cups/week to 3 cups/day), and high (≥4 cups/day). Peri-ictal hypoxemia (PIH) was defined as SpO2 < 90% for at least 5s occurring during the ictal period, the post-ictal period, or both. Ninety patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, and 323 seizures were analyzed. Both the level of usual coffee consumption (p=.033) and the level of antiepileptic drug withdrawal (p=.004) were independent risk factors for occurrence of PIH. In comparison with FS in patients with no coffee consumption, risk of PIH was four times lower in FS in patients with moderate consumption (odds ratio [OR]=.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]=.07-.91, p=.036) and six times lower in FS in patients with high coffee consumption (OR=.16, 95% CI=.04-.66, p=.011). However, when PIH occurred, its duration was longer in patients with moderate or high consumption than in those with no coffee consumption (p=.042). Coffee consumption may be a protective factor for seizure-related respiratory dysfunction, with a dose-dependent effect.

Epilepsy Outcomes and Hippocampal Volumes in Children with Multiple Parenchymal Neurocysticercoses.

ABSTRACTBackground:We aimed to study the radiological and epilepsy outcomes of children with multiple neurocysticercosis (NCC) and the relationship with hippocampus volume.Study Design:Observational study.Materials and Methods:Children between 5 and 18 years of age with NCC lesions and completed more than 2-year follow-up were enrolled. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain with a predefined protocol was done as per clinical indication, and bilateral hippocampi volume was measured with a region of interest-based manual method. Proportion of children who had radiological resolution of lesions, proportion of children who were seizure-free for at least 3 months after antiepileptic drugs withdrawal, and mean hippocampi volume were calculated.Results:During the study period, 229 children followed up in pediatric NCC clinic were enrolled, the mean age was 10.5 ± 3 years, and 129 (56%) were boys. A total of 159 (65%) children had single-lesion NCC, and 79 (35%) had multiple lesion (> 2) NCC. Resolution of lesions was seen in 8% children with multiple NCC, significantly less as compared to the single NCC group (8% vs. 27%, P = 0.006). Multiple-lesion NCC group had a higher rate of calcification as compared to children with a single lesion (66% vs. 47%, P = 0.008). Twenty-nine (37%) children with multiple-lesion NCC were seizure free for at least 3 months after antiepileptic drug withdrawal. Mean combined hippocampal volume in children with single-lesion NCC was 2.96 (0.62) mL and multiple-lesion NCC was 2.88(0.43) mL.Conclusion:Children with multiple-lesion NCC have lower resolution, and higher calcification during follow-up in comparison to single-lesion NCC. Frequency of children who remained seizure-free 3-month post AED withdrawal was similar in single- and multiple-lesion groups.

Multilobar Epilepsy Surgery in Childhood and Adolescence: Predictors of Long-Term Seizure Freedom.

Although multilobar resections correspond to one-fifth of pediatric epilepsy surgery, there are little data on long-term seizure control. To investigate the long-term seizure outcomes of children and adolescents undergoing multilobar epilepsy surgery and identify their predictors. In this retrospective study, we considered 69 consecutive patients that underwent multilobar epilepsy surgery at the age of 10.0± 5.0 yr (mean±SD). The magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion in all but 2 cases. Resections were temporo-parieto(-occipital) in 30%, temporo-occipital in 41%, parieto-occipital in 16%, and fronto-(temporo)-parietal in 13% cases. Etiologies were determined as focal cortical dysplasia in 67%, perinatal or postnatal ischemic lesions in 23%, and benign tumors in 10% of cases. At last follow-up of median 9 yr (range 2.8-14.8), 48% patients were seizure free; 33% were off antiepileptic drugs. 10% of patients, all with dysplastic etiology, required reoperations: 4 of 7 achieved seizure freedom. Seizure recurrence occurred mostly (80%) within the first 6 mo. Among presurgical variables, only an epileptogenic zone far from eloquent cortex independently correlated with significantly higher rates of seizure arrest in multivariate analysis. Among postsurgical variables, the absence of residual lesion and of acute postsurgical seizures was independently associated with significantly higher rates of seizure freedom. Our study demonstrates that multilobar epilepsy surgery is effective regarding long-term seizure freedom and antiepileptic drug withdrawal in selected pediatric candidates. Epileptogenic zones-and lesions-localized distant from eloquent cortex and, thus, fully resectable predispose for seizure control. Acute postsurgical seizures are critical markers of seizure recurrence that should lead to prompt reevaluation.

Clinical features and outcomes of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in a developing country: A 5-year retrospective study

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the frequency of electrographically confirmed nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in a cohort suspected with this condition and to determine the demographic/clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of these patients in the context of a developing country, the Philippines. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study among patients with suspected with NCSE admitted in the Philippine General Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Using the Salzberg 2013 criteria to diagnose NCSE, three electroencephalographers independently reviewed the electroencephalogram (EEG) tracings of suspected patients and were blinded from the clinical information. Then, we obtained pertinent clinical data from the medical records of EEG-confirmed NCSE cases. ResultsOut of 89 patients suspected with NCSE and with available EEG tracings, information from a total of 14 patients (15.7%) with electrographically confirmed cases were included in the analysis. Median age was 52 ranging from 22 to 77 and female-to-male ratio was 1.3:1. The following conditions were associated with NCSE: intracranial tumor (n = 4), metabolic encephalopathy (n = 4), autoimmune encephalitis (n = 3), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 3), sepsis (n = 3), cardiac arrest (n = 2), hypoxic-ischemic injury (n = 2), antiepileptic withdrawal (n = 1), intracranial abscess (n = 1), head trauma (n = 1), and meningitis (n = 1). Three patients (21.4%) had relatively good clinical outcomes (mRS 0–2) while 6 patients (42.8%) had poor outcomes (mRS 3–5) at discharge. Five patients (35.7%) died due to medical/neurological complications. Our review of the literature showed that the profile of NCSE cases identified in our resource-limited institution strengthens the findings in other populations. ConclusionOur data showed that approximately 1 in 6 patients who are suspected with NCSE may have electrographic evidence of NCSE in our setting. The most common etiologies associated with NCSE were intracranial tumors and metabolic conditions. Further studies may entail a prospective collection of data to validate the estimates of our study.