A study of herbage production, forage use, water consumption, and productivity of pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana) was conducted from 1961 through 1969, on semi-desert range in western Utah. Most of the data were obtained from a small herd of antelope confined by a fence to 10,000 acres. Herbage production on the study area ranged from 114-321 lbs of air-dried herbage per acre over a 5-year period. During the same period, annual precipitation ranged from 4.24-11.13 inches. During summers of above-average rainfall, forbs provided over 90 percent of the diet at the peak of their production. Conversely, in years of below-average summer rainfall, forbs were often scarce and contributed less than 20 percent, browse making up the remainder. Grass was commonly utilized by antelope in early spring, and occasionally in late summer and fall if new growth appeared. Succulence appeared to be the major characteristic of the forage sought by the antelope. During late fall and winter when nearly all forbs were dry, their diet was over 90 percent browse, mostly black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). Antelope water consumption varied inversely with the quantity and succulence of preferred forage species. When forbs were abundant and their moisture content was 75 percent or more, the antelope did not drink water even though it was readily available. As vegetation lost succulence, water consumption began, reaching 3 quarts of water per animal per day during extremely dry periods. Fawn:doe ratios on the study area ranged from 100:100 to 181:100. These ratios are for mature does. A statistical analysis of fawn production to precipitation received during the previous summer months indicated a significant relationship and gave statistical values of t = 4.42 (P < 0.01); r = 0.722 (P <0.05). Pronghorn antelope are not abundant in Utah despite their wide distribution within the state. Approximately 1,200 head range in small herds over roughly 15,000 square miles of semi-desert range similar to that on the study area. Historical evidence indicates that antelope were once more numerous than they have been in recent years (Udy 1953). Seton (1927:424) cited one report that numerous antelope were seen in Utah, but the specific area of Utah was not identified. By 1922 they had been reduced to less than 1,000 head (Nelson 1925:56). Concern over the apparent low productivity and the now relatively static population trend of this species led to its study on the semi-desert ranges of western Utah. 1 A contribution from Utah Federal Aid Project W-105-R, Department of Range Science, Utah State University, in cooperation with the Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 2 Stationed at Utah State University, Logan. 570 These semi-desert ranges are primarily used for winter grazing by sheep and cattle. A few areas are also grazed in summer by cattle. Heavy grazing by livestock in the past has altered vegetative composition over much of the range and many browse species have been eliminated over large areas (Stewart et al. 1940). Some of these were preferred antelope forage. The adoption of improved management practices and the replacement of sheep by winter cattle grazing has resulted in recovery of browse plants, particularly black sagebrush, on some of these range lands. Hutchings and Stewart (1953:36) report considerable increase in herbage production from black sagebrush as a result of improved grazing practices. Special thanks are extended to personnel of the Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station for their cooperation and assistance. The authors are particularly grateful to R. C. Holmgren who provided This content downloaded from 207.46.13.51 on Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:26:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms FORAGE USE AND WATER CONSUMPTION OF ANTELOPE * Beale and Smith 571 considerable help and encouragement throughout the study.