INTRODUCTIONThis paper intends to provide revolutionary narratives accounting for of political mobilization, participation, and organization. The tradition of psychoanalysis calls for attention to quality development of identity. Sociocultural theories of education and social reconstructivists emphasize life as narrative resulting from dynamic interactions among social, cultural, and personal factors that, turn, influence life construction and identity formation. According to Winnicott (1971) and Freire (1970), interactions or experiences that are attributed to development of selfand worldconsciousness come to exist through awareness of these relationships. Winnicott conceptualized phenomena as catalyst contact points at which people's subjectivity is distinguished and which identity emerges from the specific [and] quality experience. Guerra (2006) describes area, one's perpetual state of attachment undergoes a transition and moves to another state of beings (Guerra, 2006, p. 69). However, not all experiences are pertinent to identity development or are able to impact narrative patterns. In addition, phenomena are not yet identifiable and remain as something indescribable, [and] undefined (p. 69). Turner discussed state of liminality (Turner, 1969) as a threshold of transitional consciousness. McLaren's work Schooling as a Ritual Performance provides nuanced insights into pedagogical moments creating educational engagement, classroom instruction urban schooling context through anthropological lens of ritual. McLaren's work, particularly his research on resistant culture schooling, reveals that liminal experiences are those with symbolic, historical and lived meaning . . which contest legitimacy, power and significance of culture [and hegemony] (p. 146). In realm of liminality, social dramas, a series of breach, crisis, redressive action and reintegration (cited McLaren, p. 301), are enacted as rituals which people's subjectivities challenge dominant structure and consequently deauthorize and re-appropriate it. Symbolic events, performative rituals, and enactments of social dramas resemble Winnicott's concept of transitional phenomena. Similarly, liminal states of consciousness, people undergo the intermediary [...] experience which power and identity are calibrated through social relations and in intermediary area of feeling that one is truly alive (Guerra, 2006, p. 72).Cultural Work and Cultural WorkersSocial transformation is a massive movement of power, and power mobilization results organization of people and resources. Mobilization is persuasion. Rubin's analysis (2002) shows that mobilizing efforts are contextually specific, culturally meaningful, and historically inspired. Furthermore, political acts are ideologically instigated and affectively contagious. Hence, revolution demands objective conditions political and historical contexts. Subjective conditions are also indispensable (Guevara, 2003); that is, there exists a sense of exceptionalism (Guevara, 2003) that is characterized by historical uniqueness or particular factors, such as discipline leadership or symbolism revolutionary narratives. Rubin emphasized that idea is to be essentialised (2002) to be sufficiently generative and abstract for inclusive interpretation. For Rubin, goal of this idea is to enchant (Rubin, 2004).Eric Wolf, from tradition of Marxist historical anthropology, argues that to effectively transcend social strata and divisions, ideas [must] become concentrated into ideologies that are interpretive or representative of identity of masses and that are capable of inspiring general sentiments people. Wolf (Portis-Winner, 2006, p. 341) discusses conditions that mobilize social relations: (1) power of potency characterized by particular individuals; (2) an ego to impose its will for social action upon another; (3) tactical or organizational power, which individuals circumscribe actions of others; and (4) structural power that, if sufficiently powerful, organizes settings and specifies direction and distribution of energy flow. …