The Actuator Line Method (ALM) is gaining popularity in wind turbine simulations, as it can better handle some of the challenging operating conditions experienced by modern machines, such as highly turbulent inflows, severe aero-elastic forcing, and complex rotor-to-rotor interactions. However, it still falls behind other medium-fidelity methods such as the Lifting Line Free Vortex Wake (LLFVW) when it comes to resolving tip vortices and their effect on the blade spanwise load profile. The reason for such behavior is still unclear. A recent study suggested that this issue can be solved by reducing the scale of the angle of attack (α) sampling and force insertion towards the tip, without the need of additional corrections. This study builds on these findings to further investigate how the ALM base formulation - in terms of α sampling and force insertion - can be tuned to properly describe tip effects. An in-house ALM tool was employed to simulate a finite, constant-chord, NACA0018 wing, for which high-fidelity blade-resolved CFD (BR-CFD) data are available as benchmark. In the first part of the work, different strategies are outlined, including a novel approach for the de-coupling of the angle of attack sampling step from the force projection one, here called DE-coupled LineAverage (DELA). Their accuracy and sensitivity to ALM numerical settings are assessed at a fixed wing pitch angle of 6°. The analysis is then extended to a wider range of blade pitch angles, benchmarking the new ALM formulation against BR-CFD, ALM with the Dağ and Sørensen correction, and LLFVW in terms of blade loads, tip vortex structure, and computational effort.