Much of the evidence for the adaptive function of Drosophila chromosomal polymorphism has been derived from experimental population cage analysis. Observation of changes in relative frequencies of competing chromosomal arrangements over a short term of about eight to ten generations is usually sufficient to establish determinacy of outcome and the net adaptive, or fitness, values of the competing karyotypes (Wright and Dobzhansky, 1946; Dobzhansky, 1948b; Dobzhansky and Levene, 1951). However experimental populations once initiated evolve new genotypes. With a given initial genetic variance the random mating population will seek its optimum genetic equilibrium within the limits of a constant laboratory environment. Such an equilibrium may or may not be close to that characteristic of the wild population from which the genotypes were derived, depending on the cleverness of the investigator at duplication of the conditions upon which the equilibrium is contingent. Of course since most of the factors of the wild environment upon which the population's adaptation depends are virtually unknown, the investigator can never hope to approximate the wild conditions; consequently the laboratory conditions are novel to the species, yet they are not so extreme that the species' norm of reaction cannot permit reasonable survival and then adjustment of its gene pool. It is this adjustment which must be taken into account in any long term analysis. Presumably in short term studies the changes in relative frequencies of competing genotypes tell us the immediate re-