Wide Range Of Genetic Architectures Research Articles

Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have attenuated cross-population predictive performance. As existing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted predominantly in individuals of European descent, the limited transferability of PRS reduces their clinical value in non-European populations, and may exacerbate healthcare disparities. Recent efforts to level ancestry imbalance in genomic research have expanded the scale of non-European GWAS, although most remain underpowered. Here, we present a new PRS construction method, PRS-CSx, which improves cross-population polygenic prediction by integrating GWAS summary statistics from multiple populations. PRS-CSx couples genetic effects across populations via a shared continuous shrinkage (CS) prior, enabling more accurate effect size estimation by sharing information between summary statistics and leveraging linkage disequilibrium diversity across discovery samples, while inheriting computational efficiency and robustness from PRS-CS. We show that PRS-CSx outperforms alternative methods across traits with a wide range of genetic architectures, cross-population genetic overlaps and discovery GWAS sample sizes in simulations, and improves the prediction of quantitative traits and schizophrenia risk in non-European populations.

Multi-scale inference of genetic trait architecture using biologically annotated neural networks.

In this article, we present Biologically Annotated Neural Networks (BANNs), a nonlinear probabilistic framework for association mapping in genome-wide association (GWA) studies. BANNs are feedforward models with partially connected architectures that are based on biological annotations. This setup yields a fully interpretable neural network where the input layer encodes SNP-level effects, and the hidden layer models the aggregated effects among SNP-sets. We treat the weights and connections of the network as random variables with prior distributions that reflect how genetic effects manifest at different genomic scales. The BANNs software uses variational inference to provide posterior summaries which allow researchers to simultaneously perform (i) mapping with SNPs and (ii) enrichment analyses with SNP-sets on complex traits. Through simulations, we show that our method improves upon state-of-the-art association mapping and enrichment approaches across a wide range of genetic architectures. We then further illustrate the benefits of BANNs by analyzing real GWA data assayed in approximately 2,000 heterogenous stock of mice from the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and approximately 7,000 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study. Lastly, using a random subset of individuals of European ancestry from the UK Biobank, we show that BANNs is able to replicate known associations in high and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol content.

KCRR: a nonlinear machine learning with a modified genomic similarity matrix improved the genomic prediction efficiency.

Nowadays, advances in high-throughput sequencing benefit the increasing application of genomic prediction (GP) in breeding programs. In this research, we designed a Cosine kernel-based KRR named KCRR to perform GP. This paper assessed the prediction accuracies of 12 traits with various heritability and genetic architectures from four populations using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), BayesB, support vector regression (SVR), and KCRR. On the whole, KCRR performed stably for all traits of multiple species, indicating that the hypothesis of KCRR had the potential to be adapted to a wide range of genetic architectures. Moreover, we defined a modified genomic similarity matrix named Cosine similarity matrix (CS matrix). The results indicated that the accuracies between GBLUP_kinship and GBLUP_CS almost unanimously for all traits, but the computing efficiency has increased by an average of 20 times. Our research will be a significant promising strategy in future GP.

On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have gained substantial attention for complex traits prediction in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Motivated by the polygenic model of complex traits, we study the statistical properties of PRS under the high-dimensional but sparsity free setting where the triplet with being the sample size, the number of assayed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and the number of assayed causal SNPs, respectively. First, we derive asymptotic results on the out-of-sample (prediction) R-squared for PRS. These results help understand the widespread observed gap between the in-sample heritability (or partial R-squared due to the genetic features) estimate and the out-of-sample R-squared for most complex traits. Next, we investigate how features should be selected (e.g., by a p-value threshold) for constructing optimal PRS. We reveal that the optimal threshold depends largely on the genetic architecture underlying the complex trait and the sample size of the training GWAS, or the ratio. For highly polygenic traits with a large ratio, it is difficult to separate causal and null SNPs and stringent feature selection in principle often leads to poor PRS prediction. We numerically illustrate the theoretical results with intensive simulation studies and real data analysis on 33 complex traits with a wide range of genetic architectures in the UK Biobankdatabase.

Quantifying the contribution of dominance deviation effects to complex trait variation in biobank-scale data

SummaryThe proportion of variation in complex traits that can be attributed to non-additive genetic effects has been a topic of intense debate. The availability of biobank-scale datasets of genotype and trait data from unrelated individuals opens up the possibility of obtaining precise estimates of the contribution of non-additive genetic effects. We present an efficient method to estimate the variation in a complex trait that can be attributed to additive (additive heritability) and dominance deviation (dominance heritability) effects across all genotyped SNPs in a large collection of unrelated individuals. Over a wide range of genetic architectures, our method yields unbiased estimates of additive and dominance heritability. We applied our method, in turn, to array genotypes as well as imputed genotypes (at common SNPs with minor allele frequency [MAF] > 1%) and 50 quantitative traits measured in 291,273 unrelated white British individuals in the UK Biobank. Averaged across these 50 traits, we find that additive heritability on array SNPs is 21.86% while dominance heritability is 0.13% (about 0.48% of the additive heritability) with qualitatively similar results for imputed genotypes. We find no statistically significant evidence for dominance heritability ( accounting for the number of traits tested) and estimate that dominance heritability is unlikely to exceed 1% for the traits analyzed. Our analyses indicate a limited contribution of dominance heritability to complex trait variation.

SimplePHENOTYPES: SIMulation of pleiotropic, linked and epistatic phenotypes

BackgroundAdvances in genotyping and phenotyping techniques have enabled the acquisition of a great amount of data. Consequently, there is an interest in multivariate statistical analyses that identify genomic regions likely to contain causal mutations affecting multiple traits (i.e., pleiotropy). As the demand for multivariate analyses increases, it is imperative that optimal tools are available to assess their performance. To facilitate the testing and validation of these multivariate approaches, we developed simplePHENOTYPES, an R/CRAN package that simulates pleiotropy, partial pleiotropy, and spurious pleiotropy in a wide range of genetic architectures, including additive, dominance and epistatic models.ResultsWe illustrate simplePHENOTYPES’ ability to simulate thousands of phenotypes in less than one minute. We then provide two vignettes illustrating how to simulate sets of correlated traits in simplePHENOTYPES. Finally, we demonstrate the use of results from simplePHENOTYPES in a standard GWAS software, as well as the equivalence of simulated phenotypes from simplePHENOTYPES and other packages with similar capabilities.ConclusionssimplePHENOTYPES is a R/CRAN package that makes it possible to simulate multiple traits controlled by loci with varying degrees of pleiotropy. Its ability to interface with both commonly-used marker data formats and downstream quantitative genetics software and packages should facilitate a rigorous assessment of both existing and emerging statistical GWAS and GS approaches. simplePHENOTYPES is also available at https://github.com/samuelbfernandes/simplePHENOTYPES.

Allele-Specific QTL Fine Mapping with PLASMA

Although quantitative trait locus (QTL) associations have been identified for many molecular traits such as gene expression, it remains challenging to distinguish the causal nucleotide from nearby variants. In addition to traditional QTLs by association, allele-specific (AS) QTLs are a powerful measure of cis-regulation that are concordant with traditional QTLs but typically less susceptible to technical/environmental noise. However, existing methods for estimating causal variant probabilities (i.e., fine mapping) cannot produce valid estimates from asQTL signals due to complexities in linkage disequilibrium (LD). We introduce PLASMA (Population Allele-Specific Mapping), a fine-mapping method that integrates QTL and asQTL information to improve accuracy. In simulations, PLASMA accurately prioritizes causal variants over a wide range of genetic architectures. Applied to RNA-seq data from 524 kidney tumor samples, PLASMA achieves a greater power at 50 samples than conventional QTL-based fine mapping at 500 samples, with more than 17% of loci fine mapped to within five causal variants, compared to 2% by QTL-based fine mapping, and a 6.9-fold overall reduction in median credible set size compared to QTL-based fine mapping when applied to H3K27AC ChIP-seq from just 28 prostate tumor/normal samples. Variants in the PLASMA credible sets for RNA-seq and ChIP-seq were enriched for open chromatin and chromatin looping, respectively, at a comparable or greater degree than credible variants from existing methods while containing far fewer markers. Our results demonstrate how integrating AS activity can substantially improve the detection of causal variants from existing molecular data.

Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown promise in predicting human complex traits and diseases. Here, we present PRS-CS, a polygenic prediction method that infers posterior effect sizes of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using genome-wide association summary statistics and an external linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panel. PRS-CS utilizes a high-dimensional Bayesian regression framework, and is distinct from previous work by placing a continuous shrinkage (CS) prior on SNP effect sizes, which is robust to varying genetic architectures, provides substantial computational advantages, and enables multivariate modeling of local LD patterns. Simulation studies using data from the UK Biobank show that PRS-CS outperforms existing methods across a wide range of genetic architectures, especially when the training sample size is large. We apply PRS-CS to predict six common complex diseases and six quantitative traits in the Partners HealthCare Biobank, and further demonstrate the improvement of PRS-CS in prediction accuracy over alternative methods.

Comparison of methods that use whole genome data to estimate the heritability and genetic architecture of complex traits.

Multiple methods have been developed to estimate narrow-sense heritability, h2, using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in unrelated individuals. However, a comprehensive evaluation of these methods has not yet been performed, leading to confusion and discrepancy in the literature. We present the most thorough and realistic comparison of these methods to date. We utilized thousands of real whole genome sequences to simulate phenotypes under varying genetic architectures and confounding variables, and used array, imputed, or whole genome sequence SNPs to obtain “SNP-heritability” estimates (ĥ2SNP). We show that ĥ2SNP can be highly sensitive to assumptions about the frequencies, effect sizes, and levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) of underlying causal variants, but that methods that bin SNPs according to minor allele frequency and LD are less sensitive to these assumptions across a wide range of genetic architectures and possible confounding factors. These findings provide guidance for best practices and proper interpretation of published estimates.

Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) Calculator Shows that Hiding Heritability Is Partially Due to Imperfect Genetic Correlations across Studies.

Large-scale genome-wide association results are typically obtained from a fixed-effects meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from multiple studies spanning different regions and/or time periods. This approach averages the estimated effects of genetic variants across studies. In case genetic effects are heterogeneous across studies, the statistical power of a GWAS and the predictive accuracy of polygenic scores are attenuated, contributing to the so-called ‘missing heritability’. Here, we describe the online Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) calculator (available at www.devlaming.eu) which quantifies this attenuation based on a novel multi-study framework. By means of simulation studies, we show that under a wide range of genetic architectures, the statistical power and predictive accuracy provided by this calculator are accurate. We compare the predictions from the MetaGAP calculator with actual results obtained in the GWAS literature. Specifically, we use genomic-relatedness-matrix restricted maximum likelihood to estimate the SNP heritability and cross-study genetic correlation of height, BMI, years of education, and self-rated health in three large samples. These estimates are used as input parameters for the MetaGAP calculator. Results from the calculator suggest that cross-study heterogeneity has led to attenuation of statistical power and predictive accuracy in recent large-scale GWAS efforts on these traits (e.g., for years of education, we estimate a relative loss of 51–62% in the number of genome-wide significant loci and a relative loss in polygenic score R2 of 36–38%). Hence, cross-study heterogeneity contributes to the missing heritability.

A general method for combining different family-based rare-variant tests of association to improve power and robustness of a wide range of genetic architectures.

Current rare-variant, gene-based tests of association often suffer from a lack of statistical power to detect genotype–phenotype associations as a result of a lack of prior knowledge of genetic disease models combined with limited observations of extremely rare causal variants in population-based samples. The use of pedigree data, in which rare variants are often more highly concentrated than in population-based data, has been proposed as 1 possible method for enhancing power. Methods for combining multiple gene-based tests of association into a single summary p value are a robust approach to different genetic architectures when little a priori knowledge is available about the underlying genetic disease model. To date, however, little consideration has been given to combining gene-based tests of association for the analysis of pedigree data. We propose a flexible framework for combining any number of family-based rare-variant tests of association into a single summary statistic and for assessing the significance of that statistic. We show that this approach maintains type I error and improves the robustness, to different genetic architectures, of the statistical power of family- and gene-based rare-variant tests through application to simulated phenotype data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 19.

A general approach for combining diverse rare variant association tests provides improved robustness across a wider range of genetic architectures.

The widespread availability of genome sequencing data made possible by way of next-generation technologies has yielded a flood of different gene-based rare variant association tests. Most of these tests have been published because they have superior power for particular genetic architectures. However, for applied researchers it is challenging to know which test to choose in practice when little is known a priori about genetic architecture. Recently, tests have been proposed which combine two particular individual tests (one burden and one variance components) to minimize power loss while improving robustness to a wider range of genetic architectures. In our analysis we propose an expansion of these approaches, yielding a general method that works for combining any number of individual tests. We demonstrate that running multiple different tests on the same data set and using a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing is never better than combining tests using our general method. We also find that using a test statistic that is highly robust to the inclusion of non-causal variants (joint-infinity) together with a previously published combined test (sequence kernel adaptive test-optimal) provides improved robustness to a wide range of genetic architectures and should be considered for use in practice. Software for this approach is supplied. We support the increased use of combined tests in practice - as well as further exploration of novel combined testing approaches using the general framework provided here - to maximize robustness of rare variant testing strategies against a wide range of genetic architectures.