You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Upper Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma I (PD18)1 Apr 2020PD18-09 GENOMIC BIOMARKERS FOR IMMUNE-CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE RESPONSE IN METASTATIC UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA Andrew W Silagy*, Renzo G DiNatale, Diego Chowell, Vlad Makarov, Eugene Pietzak, David Solit, Michael Berger, A Ari Hakimi, Eduard Reznik, Dean Bajorin, Timothy A Chan, and Jonathan A Coleman Andrew W Silagy*Andrew W Silagy* More articles by this author , Renzo G DiNataleRenzo G DiNatale More articles by this author , Diego ChowellDiego Chowell More articles by this author , Vlad MakarovVlad Makarov More articles by this author , Eugene PietzakEugene Pietzak More articles by this author , David SolitDavid Solit More articles by this author , Michael BergerMichael Berger More articles by this author , A Ari HakimiA Ari Hakimi More articles by this author , Eduard ReznikEduard Reznik More articles by this author , Dean BajorinDean Bajorin More articles by this author , Timothy A ChanTimothy A Chan More articles by this author , and Jonathan A ColemanJonathan A Coleman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000861.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have limited treatment options: cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to provide a survival benefit, however renal insufficiency is a contraindication. More recently, some patients receiving second line immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) for urothelial carcinoma appeared to respond in trials, however immunogenic biomarkers to predict this population have not been described. Therefore, we aimed to identify genomic biomarkers associated with overall survival (OS) in patients treated with ICB. METHODS: Next-generation targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACTÒ) was performed on 131 pretreatment tumor samples from 121 patients. Using our validated pipeline, tumor mutation burden (TMB), copy-number alterations (CNAs), microsatellite instability (MSI) scores and HLA class I diversity (germline and somatic) were recorded. The primary endpoint was OS, calculated as the time from the date of metastasis to death or last follow-up. Survival estimates were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and associations with OS were tested using Cox regression models. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 121 patients, with 62 receiving ICB therapy (Table 1). A higher fraction of the genome bearing CNAs (FCNAg) was associated with adverse OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.01 [1.00, 1.02], p=0.03). This finding was specific to patients treated with ICB (interaction, p=0.001) and was independent of other prognostic variables including whole-genome doubling (Figure 1). Biomarkers of response to ICB reported for other tumor types, such as TMB (HR: 0.99 [0.96, 1.01], p=0.2) and HLA homozygosity (HR: 1.2 [0.57, 2.52], p=0.6), were not associated with OS. Resection of the primary tumor was also associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced fraction of CNAs in the genome was significantly associated with favorable outcomes in patients receiving ICB therapy for metastatic UTUC. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e379-e379 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Andrew W Silagy* More articles by this author Renzo G DiNatale More articles by this author Diego Chowell More articles by this author Vlad Makarov More articles by this author Eugene Pietzak More articles by this author David Solit More articles by this author Michael Berger More articles by this author A Ari Hakimi More articles by this author Eduard Reznik More articles by this author Dean Bajorin More articles by this author Timothy A Chan More articles by this author Jonathan A Coleman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract