Whole Brain Radiotherapy Research Articles

Stereotactic radiotherapy vs whole brain radiation therapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC: Results & reflections from the prematurely closed phase III HYBRID trial

BackgroundAll known randomized trials of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) versus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) comprise mixed histologies. The phase III HYBRID trial (NCT02882984) attempted to evaluate the non-inferiority of SRT vs. WBRT specifically for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) BMs. MethodsInclusion criteria were ≤ 5 BMs (any size) from treatment-naïve EGFRm NSCLC. All patients started a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the first day of WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions) or SRT (25–40 Gy/5 fractions per tumor volume). The primary endpoint was 18-month intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS; intention-to-treat). ResultsThe trial commenced in June 2015 and was closed in April 2021 after screening 208 patients but enrolling 85 (n = 41 WBRT, n = 44 SRT; median follow-up 31 and 36 months, respectively). Respectively, 9.5 % vs. 10.2 % of patients experienced intracranial progression at 18 months, and the median iPFS was 21.4 vs. 22.3 months (p > 0.05 for all). The SRT arm experienced higher overall survival and cognitive preservation (p < 0.05 for all). The most notable reason for low enrollment was patients not wishing to risk neurocognitive decline from WBRT. ConclusionsAlthough this phase III trial was underpowered, there was no evidence that SRT yielded outcome detriments compared to WBRT for EGFRm NSCLC BMs. Lessons from prematurely closed trials are valuable, as they often provide important experiential perspectives for investigators designing/executing future trials. In the current era, randomized trials involving WBRT without cognitive sparing measures may be at high risk of underaccrual; trial investigators are encouraged to carefully consider our experience when attempting to design such trials. However, trials of molecular-/biologically-stratified patients are highly recommended as the notion of “individualized medicine/oncology” continues to expand.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of combined therapies incorporating whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard and effective approach for brain metastases, but it is linked to neurocognitive complications, specifically issues related to the hippocampus. Innovative strategies are being explored to enhance outcomes. However, a consensus is yet to be reached in this field. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), memantine, and hippocampal avoidance (HA) techniques in treatment of brain metastases. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting the efficacy and toxicity of WBRT-based combination therapies from inception to September 19, 2023. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) for dichotomous outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Among 2175 articles, 29 studies involving 3460 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to WBRT alone, combination therapies significantly mitigated neurocognitive function decline (RD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.18-0.01]; P = 0.03) and intracranial control failure (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.52-1.44]; P = 0.02), without increasing the risk of hippocampal recurrence or high-grade toxicities. Notably, HA-WBRT + SIB/memantine demonstrated improved neurocognitive outcomes and survival benefits. WBRT-based combination therapies demonstrate improved efficacy and comparable safety to WBRT alone, with specific emphasis on the effectiveness of HA-WBRT + Memantine and HA-WBRT + SIB in optimizing therapeutic outcomes for brain metastases.

Incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal brain metastases and impact on hippocampal-avoiding radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and PurposeIn patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy. Materials and MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms “Hippocampus”, “Brain Neoplasms”, and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included. ResultsForty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 − 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 − 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 − 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17). ConclusionThe overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.

Prognostic Factors and Impact of Therapeutic Intervention in Patients With Brain Metastases at the Initial Presentation.

Background Studies investigating the normative characteristics and prognosis of patients diagnosed with brain metastases (BMs) at the onset of cancer are scarce. Therefore, we analyzed real-world treatment options. Methodology This retrospective study enrolled 112 patients newly diagnosed with BM between May 2006 and October 2021. The variables examined included patients' age, sex, recurrence split analysis, Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), number of lesions, tumor size, peripheral brain tumor edema, targeted therapy, supportive care, chemotherapy, and date of onset. Prognostic factors were assessed using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores, and GPS scoring, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) andcomputed tomography (CT) studies. Primary treatment comprised whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), with regular follow-up. Results Data from 112 survivors were analyzed, revealing a median overall survival time (MST) of 7.7 months, with some patients surviving beyond 24 months post-WBRT. Univariate analysis revealed associations between MST and RPA class, GPS, and treatment modalities (including targeted therapy and chemotherapy). RPA class 2, GPSof 0, and targeted therapy were identified as predictors of better prognosis in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup not receiving chemotherapy, no significant difference in prognosis was seen between groups with or without WBRT. Conclusions Alongside RPA, scores indicating chronic inflammatory changes, including GPS, were confirmed as crucial prognostic factors. Moreover, treatment with molecularly targeted drugs correlated with favorable prognoses. The treatment-naïve group exhibited poorer prognoses, and WBRT was not deemed a significant prognostic factor in the chemotherapy group.

A disease warranting attention from neurosurgeons: primary central nervous system post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Primary central nervous system post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PCNS-PTLD) is a rare condition, posing diagnostic and treatment challenges, with histological biopsy essential for diagnosis. Standardized treatment protocols are lacking. This disease requires urgent attention due to the increasing number of organ transplant surgeries and the use of immunosuppressive agents. From 2020 to 2023, our center diagnosed five patients with PCNS-PTLD. We reviewed their clinical records and conducted a comprehensive analysis of 22 literatures on PCNS-PTLD cases following renal transplantation or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Four patients had previously received a kidney transplant, one had undergone allogeneic HSCT. The median time from the last transplant surgery to the diagnosis of PCNS-PTLD differs between kidney transplant (21.5 years) and allogeneic HSCT (9 months). Common symptoms included motor weakness (n = 4), headache (n = 2), confusion (n = 2), and nausea (n = 2), with ring-enhancing (n = 5), typically solitary (n = 3) and supratentorial (n = 3) lesions on imaging. Diagnosis involved robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy (n = 4) or craniotomy (n = 1), all showing Epstein-Barr virus and CD20 positivity. Most cases (n = 4) were monomorphic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Treatment included rituximab (n = 3), surgical resection (n = 2), zanubrutinib (n = 1), whole-brain radiation (n = 1), and methotrexate (n = 1). At the last follow-up, the median duration of follow-up for all patients was 19 months. During this time, 3 patients had died and 2 patients were still alive. In patients with a history of kidney transplantation or allogeneic HSCT who are on long-term immunosuppressive therapy, any neurological symptoms, particularly the presence of supratentorial ring-enhancing masses in the brain on imaging, whether solitary or multiple, should raise high suspicion for this disease, warranting a timely brain biopsy. Additionally, we found that besides reducing immunosuppressants, zanubrutinib may be a potential, safe, and effective treatment for this condition. Moreover, post-surgical administration of rituximab in conjunction with whole-brain radiotherapy also appears to be a potentially safe and effective approach.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.

The mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development are complex, and its clinical presentation varies depending on the number, location, and size of brain metastases. Common symptoms include headache, neurologic deficits, and seizures. Diagnosis of BCBM typically relies on neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. Local therapies, such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, can be used to control tumor growth and relieve symptoms. Whole-brain radiotherapy has been a mainstay of treatment for BCBM, but its use has been associated with cognitive decline. Systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents plays an increasingly important role in the management of BCBM. Novel agents, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promising results in improving survival for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative BCBM. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge, clinical insights, and evolving paradigms to provide a robust understanding and roadmap for optimizing the diagnosis and management of BCBM.

Mini-Beam Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Whole-Brain Re-Irradiation—A Pilot Toxicity Study in a Healthy Mouse Model

For patients with recurrent brain metastases, there is an urgent need for a more effective and less toxic treatment approach. Accumulating evidence has shown that spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is able to provide a significantly higher therapeutic ratio with lower toxicity compared to conventional radiation using a uniform dose. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential low toxicity benefit of mini-beam radiotherapy (MBRT), a form of SFRT, for whole-brain re-irradiation in a healthy mouse model. Animals first received an initial 25 Gy of uniform whole-brain irradiation. Five weeks later, they were randomized into three groups to receive three different re-irradiation treatments as follows: (1) uniform irradiation at 25 Gy; (2) MBRT at a 25 Gy volume-averaged dose (106.1/8.8 Gy for peak/valley dose, 25 Gy-MBRT); and (3) MBRT at a 43 Gy volume-averaged dose (182.5/15.1 Gy for peak/valley dose, 43 Gy-MBRT). Animal survival and changes in body weight were monitored for signs of toxicity. Brains were harvested at 5 weeks after re-irradiation for histologic evaluation and immunostaining. The study showed that 25 Gy-MBRT resulted in significantly less body weight loss than 25 Gy uniform irradiation in whole-brain re-irradiation. Mice in the 25 Gy-MBRT group had a higher level of CD11b-stained microglia but also maintained more Ki67-stained proliferative progenitor cells in the brain compared to mice in the uniform irradiation group. However, the high-dose 43 Gy-MBRT group showed severe radiation toxicity compared to the low-dose 25 Gy-MBRT and uniform irradiation groups, indicating dose-dependent toxicity. Our study demonstrates that MBRT at an appropriate dose level has the potential to provide less toxic whole-brain re-irradiation. Future studies investigating the use of MBRT for brain metastases are warranted.

Could Cerebral Inflammatory Lesions be the Cellular Origin of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma?

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) presents a diagnostic enigma due to the inherent absence of lymphoid tissue in the central nervous system (CNS). The hypothesis posits that lymphocytes infiltrating the CNS during inflammatory responses could represent a cellular source for PCNSL, challenging traditional understandings of its etiology. In 2 illustrative cases, patients presented with neurological symptoms initially misdiagnosed as encephalitis and demyelinating disease, respectively. These diagnoses were established based on clinical assessments and initial biopsy findings. Subsequent biopsies, conducted months after the first signs of disease, confirmed the diagnosis of PCNSL in both patients. Identifying CD20-positive tumor cells was pivotal, indicating a B-cell lymphoma origin. Treatment strategies included high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy for both patients. In addition, the second patient underwent adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy after the chemotherapy regimen. The therapeutic approach significantly reduced tumor size in both cases, with no evidence of recurrence observed during the follow-up period. This outcome underscores the potential efficacy of the chosen interventions. In response to inflammatory lesions, lymphocyte infiltration into the CNS may serve as a pivotal origin for tumor cells in PCNSL. These cases highlight the complexity of diagnosing CNS disorders and suggest that various forms of encephalitis in the early stages could influence the prognosis of lymphoma. This insight into the cellular origins and treatment responses of PCNSL contributes to a broader understanding of its pathophysiology and management.

Abstract PO2-27-09: Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Routine screening for brain metastases (BMs) is currently not recommended in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). There is a growing consensus on the need for the screening of BMs in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) because 40% of patients experience BMs throughout the disease course and systemic treatment options with intracranial efficacy are now available. However, there is a lack of prospective study data on this matter. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the role of brain MRI screening for the patient with metastatic BC. Methods: Patients who newly diagnosed metastatic HER2+ or TNBC were eligible. Screening brain MRI was planned at diagnosis and failure from first line and second line of systemic therapy. All patients underwent complete physical examination and comprehensive neurologic assessment at baseline and thereafter. Patients who diagnosed symptomatic BMs were dropped from the study and subsequent treatment including local therapies and survival data were collected. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients diagnosed with asymptomatic BMs. Results: A total of 147 patients were enrolled between Sep 2018 and Aug 2023 at Yonsei Cancer Center. The median age was 51 years (range, 29-80) and most patients (92.5%, n=136) had good performance status (ECOG 0-1). The tumor subtypes were as follows: TNBC, 51.0%; HER2 (ER-, HER2+), 29.3%; luminal-HER2 (ER+, HER2+), 19.7%. The cumulative incidence of asymptomatic BMs was 20.4% for overall patients; 24.0% for TNBC (18/75), 14.0% for HER2 (6/43), and 20.7% for luminal HER2 (6/29). Symptomatic detection of BMs during study period was 14.7% for TNBC, 18.6% for HER2, and 6.9% for luminal-HER2. Initial local treatment was stereotactic radiosurgery in 30 patients (58.8%), whole-brain radiation therapy in 14 patients (27.5%), surgical resection in 2 patients (3.9%) and 6 patients (11.8%) did not receive any treatment for BMs. After a median follow-up of 20.1 months, the median overall survival following a diagnosis of BMs was 23.7 vs 7.3 months (hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.95; P = .04) in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic BMs, respectively. Conclusions: We identified approximately 20% of patients with HER2+ or TNBC as asymptomatic BMs. Emerging systemic therapies showed promising intracranial response would warrant the detection of asymptomatic BMs through routine MRI screening. Incidence of brain metastases by subtypes Citation Format: Gun Min Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Min Hwan Kim, Seul-Gi Kim, Hyung Soon Park, Jong Hee Jang, Yong Bae Kim, Seung-koo Lee. Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-27-09.

Abstract PO1-05-01: Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastases in HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy demonstrated overall survival benefits in advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) and remains the mainstay in the first and second-line treatment. Brain metastases are rare at the beginning of treatment in this group of patients and are found more often during subsequent lines of treatment and other subtypes of breast cancer. However, there is a paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of multimodality CDK4/6i and radiotherapy treatment in the management of brain metastases. Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis of ABC patients (pts) treated at our institution with radiation therapy to the brain and CDK4/6i. Pts who received radiotherapy before CDK4/6i initiation or concurrently with CDK4/6i (group 1) were compared to the patients who progressed in the brain during CDK4/6i treatment and then received radiotherapy (group 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in group 1 vs. group 2; the secondary endpoints were local control (LC) within the brain in group 1 vs. group 2 and severe toxicity. Materials/Methods: Among 379 pts who received CDK4/6i, 26 pts (6.9%) received radiotherapy to the brain. 17 pts received radiotherapy before or concurrent with CDK4/6i and were included in group 1. Nine pts received radiotherapy after CDK4/6i discontinuation due to disease progression and comprised group 2. Results: The median age was 51.5 years (IQR range 41-62). Six pts had de novo metastatic disease. The majority of patients were treated in the first-line setting (15 pts, 58%). 17 pts received ribociclib, 7 palbociclib, and 2 abemaciclib. 15 pts received letrozole as an endocrine compound and 11 pts fulvestrant. 19 pts (73%) received previous chemotherapy. Six pts had an ECOG performance status of 0, 15 pts ECOG 1, and 5 pts ECOG 2. The most common local treatment was whole-brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy delivered in 5 fractions (fr) (11 pts: 4 pts VMAT, 2 pts IMRT, 3 pts 3D, and 2 pts 2D). Eight pts received stereotactic radiation therapy (6 pts with Linac: 2 pts 24 Gy/2 fr, 2 pts 24 Gy/3 fr, 2 pts 25 Gy/5 fr; 1 pt GammKnife 20 Gy/1 fr, 1 pt Cyberknife 15 Gy/3 fr). Six- and 12-month PFS in group 1 was 88.2% (95% CI74.1-100) and 58.8% (95% CI: 37.7- 91.8), respectively, whereas in group 2, six- and 12-month PFS was 55.6% (95%CI: 31- 99.7) and 44.4% (95% CI: 21- 92.2), respectively. Six- and 12-month LC in group 1 was 92.3% (95%CI: 78.9-100) and 83.9% (65.7-100), respectively. LC in group 2 was poor: 3-month LC was only 66.7 (30-100). At a median follow-up of 8.8 months, no unanticipated toxicity was reported. Conclusion: Multimodality treatment with CDK4/6i and radiotherapy to the brain is safe and effective. Patients who developed metastases during CDK4/6i treatment tend to have a worse prognosis in comparison to those who received prior radiotherapy. CDK4/6i following radiotherapy seems to be an effective and valuable treatment option in this particular metastatic breast cancer population. Citation Format: Marcin Kubeczko, Dorota Gabryś, Anna Polakiewicz-Gilowska, Aleksandra Krzywon, Donata Gräupner, Barbara Łanoszka, Marta Mianowska-Malec, Aleksandra Leśniak, Katarzyna Świderska, Konstanty Chomik, Barbara Grandys, Michał Jarząb. Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastases in HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-01.

Abstract PO1-17-09: Real-world clinical outcomes in US patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib has demonstrated pharmacologically relevant intracranial concentrations and antitumor activity in patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, clinical data is limited, and further assessments are warranted. This retrospective study describes real-world outcomes following abemaciclib initiation in patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- MBC. Methods: Data were accessed from the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived de-identified database from 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2021. This real-world study included adult patients with a diagnosis of HR+/HER2- MBC with brain metastases prior to abemaciclib initiation. Patient and treatment characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess clinical outcomes from abemaciclib initiation: time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (rwOS). Intracranial rw best responses were also reported. Results: This study included 82 patients (one male) diagnosed with MBC and brain metastases prior to abemaciclib initiation and the median follow-up was 12.8 months. At data cut-off, 17 (20.7%) patients remained on abemaciclib therapy. Twenty-three (28%) patients received abemaciclib as the first line of therapy for MBC. Of the 82 patients in the study, 68 (82.9%) patients used concomitant endocrine therapy. Prior to abemaciclib initiation, 25 (30.5%) patients received chemotherapy and 33 (40.2%) patients received a CDK4 and 6 inhibitor. Most patients (67.1%) initiated abemaciclib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily. The median time from diagnosis of brain metastasis to abemaciclib initiation was 2.1 months (interquartile range:1.0, 8.0); 16 (19.5%) did not undergo surgical resection or receive radiation to the brain during this time. Sixty-six (80.5%) patients received brain radiation of which 56.1% received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 47.0% received whole-brain radiation (WBRT) either alone or in combination with craniotomy/metastasectomy, intrathecal chemotherapy, or surgery. The median TTD for abemaciclib was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.6, 11.3); most common reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (39.0%) or adverse events (29.3%). The median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 6.0, 11.6) and median rwOS was 20.8 months (95% CI: 13.9, 26.0). Of the patients where response data were available (n = 51), rw intracranial clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]/stable disease [SD] ≥24 weeks of abemaciclib initiation) was 62.7% (Table 1). Conclusion: In this real-world study, most patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- MBC who initiated abemaciclib treatment received SRS or WBRT prior to or concurrent with abemaciclib initiation. While the clinical outcomes, rwPFS and intracranial CBR were encouraging, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the nature of the real-world study design. Table 1. Intracranial Real-World Best Responses Citation Format: Wambui Gathirua-Mwangi, Holly Martin, Dan He, Shen Zheng, Kristin Sheffield, Jincy John, Sarah Rybowski, Priscilla Brastianos. Real-world clinical outcomes in US patients with brain metastases secondary to HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-17-09.

Audit of Presentation, Primary Site, and Pattern of Treatment in 778 Indian Patients with Brain Metastasis in 15 Years (2007–2022)

Background and Aim: Audit of brain metastasis (BM) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) in a tertiary cancer center from South India was carried out to assess the incidence of BM by site with a specific focus on their primary origin, with an aim to evaluate the relationship between the primary site and the site of metastases, pattern of care, and RT over the years. Materials and Methods: All consecutive BM patients who received RT with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT), and radiosurgery SRS between 2007 and 2022 after radiologic confirmation of a known case of malignancy or histology-proven BM were audited. Results: From January 2007 to December 2022, hospital information system (HIS)-identified 778 patients with BM treated with RT were audited. Incidence of BM was 0.64% in 2008 and over the years, it had increased to 0.89% in 2020, 0.93% in 2021, and 1.24% in 2022. Usage of SRS was almost nil in 2007, whereas in 2022, it was 40%. Also, 593 (76%) patients were treated with WBRT, 157 (20%) with SRS, and only 23 (3%) received HA-WBRT. Lung and breast cancers (40%) were the most common primary, and among rare primary tumors were those of larynx (two), tonsil (one), tongue (three), pancreas (one), and blood disorders (two). Lung primary presented with frontal lesion in 51%, parietal lesion in 43%, cerebellar lesion in 38%, and temporal lesion in 33% of cases. Conclusions: Audit of BM in the Indian population suggests a shift in treatment paradigm from WBRT to SRS as a primary modality in oligo-brain metastasis with a good performance status. This audit provides us information regarding geographic variation in presentation and primary site.

Lorlatinib in the second line and beyond for ALK positive lung cancer: real-world data from resource-constrained settings

BackgroundALK-positive lung cancers are known to have favorable responses with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lorlatinib is an approved treatment option post first and second-line ALK inhibitors and is now also in first line. We present a retrospective observational study of the safety and efficacy of patients receiving Lorlatinib in second-line and beyond.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of ALK-positive patients who received Lorlatinib post-progression or intolerance to initial therapy at the Medical Oncology department. The patients who were started on Lorlatinib between January 2018 to December 2019 were included. The patients underwent routine blood and radiological evaluation every two to three months.ResultsA total of 38 patients received Lorlatinib in the specified period. The median age was 48 years (range 23–68), with 53% of patients being male, 37% having comorbidities; the most common being hypertension and diabetes and 79% of patients were of ECOG-PS1. Twenty-two patients (58%) had received two prior TKIs. The most common sites of metastasis before starting Lorlatinib were brain (55%) and bone (53%). All patients except one received prior whole-brain radiotherapy with 4 receiving radiation twice. The median follow-up period was 49 months (95% CI: 46.4–51.6). Eighty-four percent showed disease control with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 16 months (95% CI 5.4–26.6) and 22 months (95% CI 9.9–34.1) respectively. Twelve patients died without documented progression. Five out of twelve with documented progression had brain involvement while six had lung involvement. Twelve out of twenty-four patients who progressed received subsequent chemotherapy. The most common grade 3 and above toxicities were hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Three (7.8%) patients required dose reduction.ConclusionThis real-world data confirms the efficacy of Lorlatinib in the second line and beyond with adverse effects matching that of registration studies.

Fractionated brain X-irradiation profoundly reduces hippocampal immature neuron numbers without affecting spontaneous behavior in mice

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is used to improve tumor control in patients with primary brain tumors, or brain metastasis from various primary tumors to improve tumor control. However, WBRT can lead to cognitive decline in patients. We assessed whether fractionated WBRT (fWBRT) affects spontaneous behavior of mice in automated home cages and cognition (spatial memory) using the Barnes maze.Male C57Bl/6j mice received bi-lateral fWBRT at a dosage of 4 Gy/day on 5 consecutive days. In line with previous reports, immunohistochemical analysis of doublecortin positive cells in the dentate gyrus showed a profound reduction in immature neurons 4 weeks after fWBRT. Surprisingly, spontaneous behavior as measured in automated home cages was not affected. Moreover, learning and memory measured with Barnes maze, was also not affected 4–6 weeks after fWBRT. At 10–11 weeks after fWBRT a significant difference in escape latency during the learning phase, but not in the probe test of the Barnes maze was observed.In conclusion, although we confirmed the serious adverse effect of fWBRT on neurogenesis 4 weeks after fWBRT, we did not find similar profound effects on spontaneous behavior in the automated home cage nor on learning abilities as measured by the Barnes maze. The relationship between the neurobiological effects of fWBRT and cognition seems more complex than often assumed and the choice of animal model, cognitive tasks, neurobiological parameters, and experimental set-up might be important factors in these types of experiments.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial postoperative cavities after resection of brain metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors

Background and PurposeAfter surgical resection of brain metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is indicated. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the risk of local progression and neurocognitive decline compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Aside from the optimal dose and fractionation, little is known about the combination of systemic therapy and postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), especially regarding tumour control and toxicity. MethodsIn this study, 105 patients receiving postoperative fSRT with 35 Gy in 7 fractions performed with Cyberknife were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analysed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. ResultsMedian follow-up was 20.8 months. One-year TIBC was 61.6% and one-year LC was 98.6%. Median OS was 28.7 (95%-CI: 16.9–40.5) months. In total, local progression (median time not reached) occurred in 2.0% and in 20.4% radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) of the cavity (after median of 14.3 months) were diagnosed. Absence of extracranial metastases was identified as an independent prognostic factor for superior OS (p = <0.001) in multivariate analyses, while a higher Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was predictive for longer OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.041). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) developed in 13% of patients. ConclusionFSRT after surgical resection of BM is an effective and safe treatment approach with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.

Neuroprotection in radiotherapy of brain metastases: A pattern-of-care analysis in Germany, Austria and Switzerland by the German Society for radiation Oncology − working group Neuro-Radio-Oncology (DEGRO AG-NRO)

Background and purposeMany patients with solid tumors develop brain metastases (BM). With more patients surviving long-term, preservation of neurocognitive function gains importance. In recent years, several methods to delay cognitive deterioration have been tested in clinical trials. However, knowledge on the extent to which these neuroprotective strategies have been implemented in clinical practice is missing. Materials and methodsWe performed an online survey regarding treatment patterns of BM in German-speaking countries, focused on the use of neuroprotective approaches. The survey was distributed among radiation oncologists (ROs) registered within the database of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). ResultsPhysicians of 78 centers participated in the survey. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is still preferred by 70 % of ROs over stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with 6–10 BM. For 4–5 BM WBRT is preferred by 23 % of ROs. The fraction of ROs using hippocampal sparing (HS) in WBRT has increased to 89 %, although the technique is used on a regular basis only by a minority (26 %). The drug memantine is not widely prescribed (14% of ROs). A trend was observed for university hospitals to implement neuroprotective approaches more frequently. ConclusionThere is considerable heterogeneity regarding the treatment of BM in German-speaking countries and a general standard of care is lacking. Neuroprotective strategies are not yet standard approaches in daily clinical routine, although usage is increasing. Further clinical trials, as well as improvement of technical opportunities and reimbursement, might further shift the treatment landscape towards neuroprotective radiation treatments in the future.

Glioblastoma Presenting with the Radiological Features of a Meningioma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Glioblastomas, which are the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults, occasionally exhibit radiological features similar to those of other diseases. However, instances of them mimicking meningiomas are rare. This article describes a rare case of a glioblastoma presenting with radiological features similar to those of a meningioma. A 55-year-old man was admitted following 2 months of gait disturbance, mild dysarthria, and dizziness. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested an extra-axial tumor in the interhemispheric fissure exhibiting a cerebrospinal fluid cleft sign, which was indicative of a meningioma. Bifrontal craniotomy for tumor resection revealed a highly vascularized, yellowish-gray friable mass within the interhemispheric fissure. The pathological diagnosis was glioblastoma. The patient’s symptoms improved following treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy, and his condition was stable during a 5-month follow-up period. Glioblastomas may present with radiological features similar to those of meningiomas, making it challenging for physicians to establish an accurate diagnosis and effective treatment plan.

Myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative consolidation for primary central nervous system lymphoma: results of Alliance 51101

AbstractAlthough it is evident that standard-dose whole-brain radiotherapy as consolidation is associated with significant neurotoxicity, the optimal consolidative strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. We performed a randomized phase 2 clinical trial via the US Alliance cancer cooperative group to compare myeloablative consolidation supported by autologous stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative consolidation after induction therapy for PCNSL. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to be initiated that eliminates whole-brain radiotherapy as a consolidative approach in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Patients aged 18 to 75 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to induction therapy (methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab, and cytarabine) followed by consolidation with either thiotepa plus carmustine and autologous stem cell rescue vs induction followed by nonmyeloablative, infusional etoposide plus cytarabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 113 patients were randomized, and 108 (54 in each arm) were evaluable. More patients in the nonmyeloablative arm experienced progressive disease or death during induction (28% vs 11%; P = .05). Thirty-six patients received autologous stem cell transplant, and 34 received nonmyeloablative consolidation. The estimated 2-year PFS was higher in the myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative arm (73% vs 51%; P = .02). However, a planned secondary analysis, landmarked at start of the consolidation, revealed that the estimated 2-year PFS in those who completed consolidation therapy was not significantly different between the arms (86% vs 71%; P = .21). Both consolidative strategies yielded encouraging efficacy and similar toxicity profiles. This trial was registered at www.clininicals.gov as #NCT01511562.

Early Experience With Biologically Effective Dose-Comparable Short-Course Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Intracranial Disease.

For inpatients with metastatic intracranial disease burden exceeding established guidelines for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), the standard of care involves whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), typically administered as a 2-week course of treatment with biologically effective dose (BED) of 60Gy. However, shorter course WBRT provides theoretical advantages in quality of life and decreasing systemic therapy delay. This retrospective study evaluates our early experience with BED-comparable short-course WBRT (23Gy in 5 fractions; BED=58.3Gy) for metastatic intracranial disease. Over a recent 2-month timeframe, 3 inpatients with intracranial disease burden exceeding SRS guidelines were administered BED-comparable short-course WBRT. Due to the high intracranial disease burden, 23Gy was chosen over 20Gy for 5-fraction WBRT due to the desire to optimally mimic the durability of the classic 30Gy in 10 fraction treatment regimen. The mean age at treatment was 65.7 years, the mean Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 60, and the mean number of intracranial metastases was 20.3. The mean duration between inpatient Radiation Oncology consultation and the start of WBRT (following CT radiation therapy simulation) was 6.7 days. All patients completed WBRT no later than 2 weeks from the initial inpatient consultation. For inpatients with intracranial metastatic disease burden exceeding established SRS guidelines, BED-comparable short-course WBRT administered to 23Gy in 5 fractions (4.6Gy/fraction) is safe and efficacious. Given previous literature indicating that nearly half of the patients prescribed traditional 2-week WBRT die without completing treatment, BED-comparable WBRT represents an attractive and promising WBRT alternative in this patient population.

A Population-Based Analysis of Brain Metastasis Burden and Management in 8705 Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION: Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have historically been characterised by poor overall survival (OS) and high risk for intracranial metastatic disease (IMD), but large-scale real-world evidence on clinical presentation and treatment in this population is lacking. These patients traditionally receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for IMD, however, a recent systematic review has indicated that OS following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be non-inferior compared with WBRT. METHODS: We included all patients diagnosed with SCLC between April 2007 and March 2018 identified through a provincial health administrative database. Information on patient and treatment characteristics, incidence and time to IMD, and OS from time of SCLC diagnosis were collected and analyzed using R. RESULTS: A total of 8705 patients were included. Median age was 68 years (range 18-103). Most patients presented with extensive disease (n = 5625) and were diagnosed after 2011 (n = 5768). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 5563) had significantly longer OS than those who did not (median 10.64 vs 1.58 mo, HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.34-0.37). 6662 patients received brain imaging at the time of primary diagnosis (CT: 5126, MRI: 1536), and 88% of patients surviving longer than 6 mo received more than one follow-up brain scan. 31% developed IMD (synchronous: 1175, asynchronous: 1511) with median intracranial progression-free survival of 5.65 mo. Median OS of patients with IMD was 9.76 mo, 29 and 1300 received SRS and WBRT as first treatment for their IMD, respectively. OS was in favour of SRS over WBRT (median 20.47 vs 8.74 mo, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84), which remained significant in multivariate analysis (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OS for patients with SCLC remains poor and many patients present with IMD. Some patients with SCLC may benefit from SRS treatment.