reviews83 rachel bromwich, a.o.h. jarman, and brynley f. roberts, eds., TheArthur ofthe Welsh: TheArthurian Legendin MedievalWebh Literature. Cardiff: University ofWales Press, 1991; rpt. 1995. isbn: 0-7083-1307-8. $25. This volume is the first fruit ofa projected revision, undertaken by the EugeneVinavcr Memorial Trust, of R.S. Loomis's Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1959). It considers the Celtic historical and literary sources of the Arthurian legend, the subject matter of ALMA chapters 1-8, 12, and 16. The thirteen essays, all by leading scholars of Welsh literature and history, offer readers access to recent scholarship that has been difficult to keep abreast of, especially on this side of the Atlantic. Its appearance in an affordable paperback edition is most welcome. Taken together, the introduction and the first chapter reexamine theWelsh, Gaelic, and insular Latin sources for the 'historical' Arthur. Ofthese, the traditional linchpin has been the ninth-century Historia Brittonum, andThomas Charles-Edwards devotes his chapter on 'The Arthur ofHistory' to a scrutiny ofthat text and ofthe critique to which it has been subjected by David Dumville. In a densely textured analysis CharlesEdwards argues that the Arthurian chapters have more to tell us about the structure ofthe Historia Brittonum than they do about an historical Arthur. Similarly, Brynley Roberts sees the determining Arthur of Geoffrey of Monmouth in terms of the structure of the Historia Regum Britanniae. Throughout the two chapters that he contributes, however, Roberts emphasizes the continuity ofGeoffrey's history ofBritain with a coherent Welsh Arthurian tradition that he enlarged and Normanized but did not betray. He shows, too, in his discussion of the Welsh versions of the Historia, how Geoffrey fed the same tradition upon which he had drawn. Roberts's discussion of Culhwch ac Olwen underscores the shift in recent scholarship towards an appreciation of the talc's literary, as opposed to oral-traditional qualities. His brief treatment, in the same chapter, of certain of the Triads, distinguishes the fuller narratives in the later recensions from the more obscure allusions ofthe earlier. Like much else in the book, these sections remind us that our written sources are not simply windows upon an oral tradition that lies behind them. At the same time, the poems, the Triads, Culhwch ac Olwen, and the saints' lives—whose importance as vessels ofArthurian legend in Brittany and Wales is here acknowledged—do seem to draw upon a thematically coherent, though far from single and linear, body oftradition about Arthur. The Triads, discussed in a chapter ofALMA by Rachel Bromwich, who subsequently produced—and later revised and expanded—an invaluable edition of this compendium of Welsh lore, are here discussed in either Chapter 3 or Chapter 9, according as they reflect early tradition or the influence ofFrench romance. Bromwich herselfdraws on her intimate knowledge of and long reflection upon the Triads in her thoroughgoing review ofthe evidence for Welsh elements in the Tristan legend. A.O.H. Jarman updates his own account in ALMA ofthe Merlin legend in Welsh. Patrick Sims-Williams brings to his examination of 'The Early Welsh Arthurian Poems' the linguistic, literary, and codicological insights ofthe thirty years that elapsed between KennethJackson's discussion ofthe same material in ALMA and the original arthuriana 6.3 (1996) reviews84 publication of this collection in 1991. A very useful framework for this discussion is provided in the description, by the editors and by Daniel Huws, of the medieval manuscripts inwhich theWelsh language materials ofArthurian legend and literature are preserved. The three Welsh tales with analogues in the work ofChretien—Gereintfab Erbin, Owein, and Peredur—receive a chapter each here, by Roger Middleton, R.L.Thomson, and Ian Lovecy, respectively. All three focus on the adaptation of common story material to Welsh narrative style, and to whatJack Goody calls 'the interface between the written and the oral' reflected in the texts, rather than to questions ofsource and primacy. Another change in the structure ofthe material is that BreuddwydRhonabwy is quite properly separated from the older Culhwch ac Olwen, and discussed instead in conjunction with other late medieval and early modern Welsh Arthurian texts. Ceridwen Lloyd-Morgan does a fine job of delineating the issues associated with Breuddwyd...
Read full abstract