PURPOSE We tested the hypotheses that 1. endurance performance (VO2max) remains unaffected after 13 weeks of individualized run training with a mean daily volume of 5 % of VO2max' and 2. the effects of the mode of training pattern (stochastic (STO) vs. constant (CON) load over time) on VO2max are similar. METHODS 14 endurance trained runners (33.7 ± 5 yrs., 76.9 ± 3.7 kg, 182.8 ± 4.5 cm) were randomly divided into two run training groups. In group CON, the training load, duration and number of sessions per week was kept constant. Group STO absolved a training program with stochastic changes of duration and number of sessions per week, resulting in a higher variability of number of sessions and volume of each session. Averaging 4 weeks, the total training load was equal for CON and STO. Run velocity was set to 70 % of anaerobic threshold (AT) in both groups, total duration of training was 13 weeks. Mean weekly volume was individually fixed at an energy consumption of 5 % of VO2max according to the protein synthesis model of Mader (1989). Before and after the training period, subjects underwent an incremental treadmill test for the determination of AT, and a further test to determine VO2max. Run economy was determined as mean O2 consumption per 1 m/s. RESULTS Neither mean training duration nor total number of training sessions was different between groups (5102 ± 544 (CON) vs. 4989 ± 561 (STO) min/13 weeks; 60.0 ± 2.3 (CON) vs. 58.4 vs. 6.7 (STO) sessions/13weeks). Furthermore, mean velocity during training was the same for both groups (2.65 ± 0.27 (CON) vs. 2.73 ± 0.32 (STO) m/s). VO2max of both groups remained constant after 13 weeks of run training (CON: 58.1 ± 6.0 vs. 58.7 ± 3.0 ml/min/kg; STO: 60.4 ± 3.8 vs. 59.0 ± 5.0 ml/min/kg). Run velocity at AT also did not change after training (CON: 3.9 ± 0.4 m/s vs. 3.9 ± 0.4 m/s; STO: 3.8 ± 0.4 m/s vs. 3.9 ± 0.2 m/s). Run economy was less well developed in STO as compared to CON prior to the training program (O2 consumption: 11.9 ± 0.8 vs. 10.8 ± 0.6 ml/min/kg per m/s, p<0.05, in STO vs. CON), and declined in STO significantly (p<0.05) to the same low value as compared to CON after the program (10.9 ± 0.5 vs. 10.7 ± 0.6 ml/min/kg per m/s, in STO vs. CON). CONCLUSIONS The unchanged VO2max values and velocities at AT in both groups after the training program are consistent with the protein synthesis model of Mader (1989), which predicts no changes at a mean daily load of 5 % of VO2max. A mean daily training load of more than 5 % of VO2max is necessary to increase endurance performance in trained runners. Our data further indicate that training pattern does not have any different effect on VO2max, if mean velocity during training and mean total load are remained the same.
Read full abstract