In an equilibrium framework the dynamics of the aggregate dividend are taken as given and the volatility of the wealth portfolio is determined by the prices of risk in the model. Since option prices depend strongly on volatility they are very informative about these risk prices. We use this observation to compare the pricing of S&P 500 options to a model in which preferences are recursive and aggregate consumption has stochastic growth and volatility. We find that the pricing of the risk of shocks to the growth rate of consumption is inconsistent with a model in which the representative agent has isoelastic recursive utility.
Read full abstract